Damn. RIP MICHALECOLEHoly shit that was a quick ban wtf
........did I miss something?Fucking this wtf
........did I miss something?
f***ing this wtf
it wasn't even a political topic
it wasn't even a political topic
We can't even discuss news now?
I've been 90KL'd for the news, so... no, you can't.I mean, it can be how you phrase things. I could certainly see how a moderation could happen depending on circumstances. But Michalecole's post was just a straight fact. Again, maybe I missed a follow-up where he said something off color but from what I saw I don't understand why he got banned
it wasn't even a political topicThere was no way that topic was going to stay non-political. The fact that one of the first few posts was an "oh no!, anyway" post is proof enough of that.
enforcement is so vague that that's why I've opted to not discuss anything that's real life (except my own personals)It's also highly personalized. I have a moderation note on a suspension about a year ago that basically says that while a particular topic is allowed on the board, I should not participate in such topics.
There was no way that topic was going to stay non-political. The fact that one of the first few posts was an "oh no!, anyway" post is proof enough of that.It's hilarious you don't know that it was a confusedtorchic post.
It's hilarious you don't know that it was a confusedtorchic post.I absolutely did know and that's why I pointed it out.
There was no way that topic was going to stay non-political. The fact that one of the first few posts was an "oh no!, anyway" post is proof enough of that.
being indifferent that someone was shot does not make it political either lmfaoThat is not "being indifferent" it's being mockingly dismissive. And it's political on this site because you can only use that in one direction; using that as a response to a person of the opposite political persuasion being shot would get you banned almost as fast as MICHALECOLE.
So are they just skipping moderation and suspension and outright banning people for first offenses based on some inconsistent criteria?
So are they just skipping moderation and suspension and outright banning people for first offenses based on some inconsistent criteria?You can only discuss news and topics within the approved narrative. No reported facts or differentiating opinion allowed.
You can only discuss news and topics within the approved narrative. No reported facts or differentiating opinion allowed.
CE is still a board? I dont even see it on the list of boards
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-eventsOhhh I see. I have to have an invitation lmao
Ohhh I see. I have to have an invitation lmao
Don't feel bad, you're missing out on precisely nothing of value.Oh I know lol
Ohhh I see. I have to have an invitation lmao
Don't feel bad, you're missing out on precisely nothing of value.
Oh I know lolIt's better if you don't visit the forums there. It's a cesspool of people glorifying a person's death and accusing the orange man of orchestrating a hit. The CE board is like the reverse version of 4chan's politically incorrect /pol/ board, just with the political sides switched. Always funny that for a side that doesn't like guns, they sure do like using them on people they don't like and cheer it.
coolNo one expected you to be moderated for it, because it aligns with the site's moderation politics. Had the victim been a public figure from the left, you would have been moderated for it.
specifically the part where i'm not modded for it, and mike got banned for just saying the guy was shot in utah, so you are wrong. that's the cool part.
anyways,
nah ce had three 500 topics celebrating his deathThat's to be expected, for exactly the reason outlined above.
so let me get this straightMore or less correct. If any of that confuses you, that's on you.
you are saying mike got banned because his topic would have turned into a political topic, which justifies it somehow
while also saying that being indifferent, or mockingly dismissive as you claimed, aligns with the moderators views, thus not getting me moderated
but simply saying "charlie kirk was shot in utah" somehow doesn't?
am i getting this correct.
When the rule keepers cant have an honest discussion, the rules come across as inconsistent. Because they are.It's always been like this when political ideologues captured a site. You are not allowed to question the approved narrative. It's like the mainstream media's coverage of the Ukrainian refugee girl being stab in North Carolina. If the roles and races were reversed, every city in America would be burned tonight, and you'll have the same people who champion for minority rights suddenly denigrating the minorities for wanting to use their 2nd amendment rights to protect their stores from being robbed la the rooftop Koreans.