It's still funny how badly these articles aged

Current Events

Current Events » It's still funny how badly these articles aged
https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2016/12/01/preview-with-frank-wests-return-dead-rising-4-aims-to-revamp-series/amp/

https://comicbook.com/amp/2016/06/20/how-dead-rising-4-will-be-deeper-yet-more-accessible-than-ever/

Despite being bigger and more impressive than its predecessors, Dead Rising 3 never caught on the way its predecessors have. Part of the reason was that the series still kowtowed to the elements of its past. Players still had to deal with the clumsy controls and an archaic design that became an obstacle for fun.


lmao how can people be this tone-deaf
</topic>
This game and its coverage had doomed written all over it from the start though.

Still waiting on that third threat
3
was a masterpiece compared to 4. I was so disappointed. It was like a reimagining/sequel but worse in every way. No reason for replay
darkprince45 posted...
3
was a masterpiece compared to 4. I was so disappointed. It was like a reimagining/sequel but worse in every way. No reason for replay

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejeIT0MBSac

7:40
They actually outright use people dont want to play the game again as a reason for neutering everything.
</topic>
Current Events » It's still funny how badly these articles aged