Maybe the worst good to bad ratio of any director.
You saw it?
I'm not on board with trying to portray Napoleon as a buffoon. He was a lot of things, but a buffoon was definitely not one of them.I don't know man getting exiled and dying of stomach cancer is pretty buffoonery
wym
he's got one of the most consistent
he's never made a good movie
hi bsp i love you
Are you not entertained?Not by Gladiator.
Terry CamilleriWhy did googling that name show me an attractive anime woman though
What about the first Alien movie?Not to mention Blade Runner.
Gladiator?
Are you not entertained?
What about the first Alien movie?
Gladiator?
Are you not entertained?
the only good alien was 4 and only bc winona ryder is a babebro
He has not been the same since Prometheus, imo.
Stupid ass idea for a movie imo. I don't think anyone wants to see a movie about Napoleonhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poDrD1JzxC8
the only good alien was 4 and only bc winona ryder is a babe
gladiator was dumb af and the sequel will be even dumber
wymLol, @ArsGoetia just saw this
he's got one of the most consistent
he's never made a good movie
hi bsp i love you
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/2/2a69930b.jpg
Obviously the superior Napoleon
Maybe the worst good to bad ratio of any director.Francis Ford Coppola
Francis Ford CoppolaTrue, but he generally has just gone downhill over time. Scott has always been all over the place, and had another massive critical and commercial success a few years back with The Martian
wait, so Napoleon actually blows up the egyptian pyramids in the movie? what the hell?? lmaoYeah thats how he got the name Napoleon Dynamite.
Yeah thats how he got the name Napoleon Dynamite.
Ridley Scott really made himself look like a fool with this one. Who cares about historical accuracy, get a life nerds lol.Gladiator is arguably worse when it comes to historical accuracy.
Gladiator is arguably worse when it comes to historical accuracy.Not even arguably. Gladiator is just fanfiction set in Rome.