Scardude posted...
My point is that the use of the site is up to the person. Right now, you are using it as defamation piece where you can use it better for your own argument. To point out that there are no legitimate statements or science for markers for the side that is weak. This would better enhance your argument while taking into account the other side.
In reality, facts don't always convince people but at least you can shoot down while acknowledging their points.
Thats not how the site itself presents that information, though. You could say the same thing about forums that host discussions from white supremacists or tweets from trump. The source is not reputable or trustworthy in those discussions, and it is harmful content.
And they do have mention of scientific consensus on certain debate issues. Its outdated and problematic in the least, and a bad example to hold up as it was in this thread originally. Students should not be debating the humanity of vulnerable and marginalized minority groups under the guise of critical thinking.