Antiyonder posted...
I don't know. I'd say any person who voices opposition to LGBTQ+ rights on religious ground need to agree to a test to prove they practice what they preach, constantly before their voice can be given platform.
Refusal means rejection and any signs of the slightest vice (Again movie/show/book with even the slightest bit of profanity).
I don't know. Is there any case where it's morally acceptable to limit what others do/gain based on religion while granting yourself many exceptions?
Person A forcing person B to live by the standards of person A's religion is bullshit, whether or not person A is a hypocrite.