"Huh, another Spiderman-without-Spiderman movie is getting poor reviews and will probably flop. Better try again," - Sony, probably
And yet, the saddest thing about Madame Web is that as bad as it is, its the type of bad you forget 10 minutes after you watch it. Its never bad enough to be enjoyable and its (obviously) never good enough to be memorable.
Germain Lussier - Gizmodo
For those trashing the Marvels, here is a terrible superhero movie.They're both terrible
They're both terribleNo. The last batch of MCU movies are bad while Morbius and now Madame Web are legit terrible.
Mcu is finishedThis isn't part of the mcu
I remember someone said that tax write off movies should be released first so they can claim on the loss?If this happened as much as people think they did, most movies would be terrible.
I think this is what they're doing.
"Huh, another Spiderman-without-Spiderman movie is getting poor reviews and will probably flop. Better try again," - Sony, probably
Blame Venom for giving Sony the smash hit they needed to keep limping along throwing out D-List* Spider-Man characters in the vain hope that one of them would turn out to be their very own GotG.
* to the inevitable nerd frothing at the mouth to pounce on this, no, I'm not calling Venom a D-List character.
Venom was worth exactly one watch
They're both terrible
I enjoyed the Marvels.It was fine. Nothing groundbreaking, but nothing terrible. The leads had good chemistry and I thought the swapping was utilized well. Under two hours, too, which I appreciated. Between that and Mutant Mayhem, it felt like a nice return to form.
I know I need to respect other people's opinions....
But it still annoys me to no end that people are so starved for good live-action Venom content that they accept those trash ass movies.
"Huh, another Spiderman-without-Spiderman movie is getting poor reviews and will probably flop. Better try again," - Sony, probably
MALONE: Oh, this is - this is it for us. We love reading from a contract. All right, let's - lay it on us, Joanna.
ROBINSON: All right. (Reading) Sony must commence production on a new "Spider-Man" film within three years, nine months and release it within five years, nine months after the release of preceding picture. Boom.
MALONE: Translation - if Sony does not release a "Spider-Man" movie every five years and nine months, the movie rights go back to Marvel, and Sony loses one of the most valuable pieces of intellectual property in the world? I - hard to fact-check. I'm going to go and say it.
WONG: So if you've wondered why there always seems to be a "Spider-Man" movie, it's because there kind of has to be one if Sony wants to keep the rights.
MALONE: And does this go on for eternity?
ROBINSON: Yes.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/c/c957ce34.jpg
where's the Madame Jebb pic to go with this
I know I need to respect other people's opinions....Is it cliche yet to say that Upgrade is a better Venom movie than the actual Venom movies?
But it still annoys me to no end that people are so starved for good live-action Venom content that they accept those trash ass movies.
No. The last batch of MCU movies are bad while Morbius and now Madame Web are legit terrible.They can all be terrible together. It's not a competition, it's a lifestyle.
I've seen it. My favourite part of the movie was when she went "madam, it's webbin' time!" and webbed up all over the shop
Why can't Sony make a Spider-Man movie about any of the other Spider-people? Disney can only stop them from making one about Peter Parker.Disney can't stop them making a Spider-Man movie about Peter Parker either. Sony own the film rights to everything Spider-Man related. If tomorrow they wanted to make a new Spider-Man film with a new Peter they could do.
Disney can't stop them making a Spider-Man movie about Peter Parker either. Sony own the film rights to everything Spider-Man related. If tomorrow they wanted to make a new Spider-Man film with a new Peter they could do.Then why don't they? I would.
Why can't Sony make a Spider-Man movie about any of the other Spider-people? Disney can only stop them from making one about Peter Parker.Because theyve been trying to copy Marvel and make a whole movie universe all making tons of money, but they can only use the people from and created in Spiderman comics. So yeah they can only use B-D list characters
If Sydney Sweeney showed full frontal, it would be 100%
Then why don't they? I would.