WhereTwoFeom posted...
Im referring to those protections too. There isnt more protection. Thats your false presumption.
There are lots and lots of content that are limited for various reasons, even more in the past.
In any case none of that is relevant to or obvious from your point simply being There was free speech before X. Youre just changing the goalposts.
Is not a presumption, youre just flatly wrong about this. We dont have more free speech because TikTok exists, therefore we dont have less when it doesnt. The content of speech and the manner of speech are distinct, and the law does not treat them equally. Thats well-established. Goalposts firmly planted.