You have The Dolfins higher than the Yankees?To be fair, I do seem to have a thing for fish logos. Honestly though, I couldnt decide on whether to put the Yankees in the good tier or excellent tier. Personally, I prefer the older Red Sox logo. That one is definitely in the excellent tier. Perhaps I was too harsh and couldve given it a better ranking.
Even if you don't like The Yankees that is a great Logo.
Also, fun fact, the other Yankee logo was designed by Tiffany & Co.
I would say The Red Sox should at least be in the good category.
It's simple, but does its job. Like Fenway, some things never change.
The Citco sign thing though is a little ghetto..
Panthers, Saints, Colts, and Bears should be "not bad". Jets should be "trash".I find the Colts logo to be a bit dull and Im not really feeling the color scheme with the Bears logo.
Where would you put the 1927 Detroit Tigers logo iyoI think itd be it in the Okay tier.
To be fair, I do seem to have a thing for fish logos. Honestly though, I couldnt decide on whether to put the Yankees in the good tier or excellent tier. Personally, I prefer the older Red Sox logo. That one is definitely in the excellent tier. Perhaps I was too harsh and couldve given it a better ranking.
I find the Colts logo to be a bit dullIt's basic, but I think in its case the simplicity is a plus, and it's representative of the team name.
Im not really feeling the color scheme with the Bears logo.That's fair. It could be better.
Ignoring everything else, you think that the Blue Jackets have an excellent logo?I dont much about hockey, but I do think this logo is pretty unique and has a great color scheme.
Very rare take.
i hate the dallas cowboys but it's hard to beat the star. it's top tier imo.Eh, Im not a big fan of solologos like that. They seem kind of boring and lazy.
The Browns were my favorite team for a day when I found that little Brownie logo.This is a great logo.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/59dab1d2.png
Eh, Im not a big fan of solologos like that. They seem kind of boring and lazy.