I hate that people have started characterizing the job taking part of AI as a bad thing.That's not going to happen fast enough to cover people's bills. If it even becomes a thing in the next 20yrs.
No, that's not a bad thing. It's the whole fucking point. We make it so that humans no longer have to work, then establish a UBI
We make it so that humans no longer have to work, then establish a UBIYou're missing a lot of steps, like the ones where the people who have the power to do that opt to instead hoard more wealth for themselves and do everything they can to keep it that way.
I hate that people have started characterizing the job taking part of AI as a bad thing.hey UBI would be great
No, that's not a bad thing. It's the whole fucking point. We make it so that humans no longer have to work, then establish a UBI
We never can lol. That's pretty common with most forms of technology.
So we have a technology that's being pushed on the literal promises of ending climate change and curing all diseases, but in reality it's just taking all our jobs and making it harder to discern what's real from what's fake.Wait, you mean to tell me the last 100 years of science fiction has been predicting the future all along? Shocking!
No, that's not a bad thing. It's the whole fucking point. We make it so that humans no longer have to work, then establish a UBI
I hate that people have started characterizing the job taking part of AI as a bad thing.
No, that's not a bad thing. It's the whole fucking point. We make it so that humans no longer have to work, then establish a UBI
No, that's not a bad thing. It's the whole fucking point. We make it so that humans no longer have to work, then establish a UBI
It'll take away some jobs and also create some new jobs. Fear of "taking your jobs" is rarely a good argument
What makes you think A.I. won't just take the new job?
I just think based on the past, despite some new technology taking away a job, we tend to create new jobs or adapt current jobs based on the new tech. And as ai increases, it will take those new jobs, and new jobs will be created based on that.
And as AI increases, the need for new types of jobs will decrease.At which point the peasantry will revolt unless the ruling class throw them a bone. It's either UBI or riots in the streets
At which point the peasantry will revolt unless the ruling class throw them a bone. It's either UBI or riots in the streetsWhat's to stop AI drones from killing rioters?
I just think based on the past, despite some new technology taking away a job, we tend to create new jobs or adapt current jobs based on the new tech. And as ai increases, it will take those new jobs, and new jobs will be created based on that.
Darklit_Minuet posted...This. AI SHOULD least to a post-money human paradise of unlimited time and creativity at our disposal.
We make it so that humans no longer have to work, then establish a UBI
You're missing a lot of steps, like the ones where the people who have the power to do that opt to instead hoard more wealth for themselves and do everything they can to keep it that way.
I hate that people have started characterizing the job taking part of AI as a bad thing.In modern society we have basically never used labor-saving devices for any reason other than to do more labor.
No, that's not a bad thing. It's the whole fucking point. We make it so that humans no longer have to work, then establish a UBI
What... The only other order of properties then would be more work and no ubi? Is that the order you prefer?I think he's saying that we need to implement UBI before we start automating all the jobs.
What... The only other order of properties then would be more work and no ubi? Is that the order you prefer?Masterpug53 only said the order was wrong and I agree with that.