bfslick50 posted...
You're not using that word correctly. It's a conclusion based off the research in the paper. If you disagree with the conclusion then the burden of evidence is on you to find the flaw in the underlying research.
Its really not. Its just a theory. The scientist has to prove their research correct after multiple trials and over time. Its not just right because they said so.
Melting ice contracts and not expands for more fun actual science facts.