Whew man all I am going to say is you guys must have real high opinions of billionaires if you still see them as human beings with actual human feelings. I am just going to chalk it up to the fact that it feels real good to imagine someone you hate "having a melty" and the general inability to comprehend what someone's life is like after 20 years of unlimited money, absolutely nothing to do, and an immunity to any and all consequences.Everyone: "JK Rowling is a massive piece of shit because she hates trans people"
Everyone: "JK Rowling is a massive piece of shit because she hates trans people"
You: "Lol you guys are so stupid for thinking billionaires are human enough to hate people!"
You don't have to be literally "breaking keyboards" mad to be having a melty. Posting a clearly rambling, incoherent post/Tweet/whatever, specifically because you're too bothered to actually make sense, is also "having a melty," so I have literally no idea what you're trying to argue.
You gave your opinion as to why you believe it is a meltdown, and I gave my opinion as to why I don't think this should be classified as a "melty". What is confusing to you about that? Are differing opinions to yours really so foreign to you that you can't comprehend that they do, in fact, exist?
He's trying to argue that Rowling is just doing some light trolling and not being an absolute shitheel that is a threat to people. That this is some big joke to get her jellies off.
While she threatens lawsuits against people calling her out, pushes hate, goes on open podcasts to spout her bullshit, and funds initiatives. He wants her harmful bullshit to be allowed to exist without pushback.
I'm asking why you appear to be so upset by people calling it a melty that you're going full force into trying to argue it isn't one, instead of just letting them have their opinion.
I can't have an opinion too? I am just not allowed to express my opinion too? I can't reply to all these people quoting me with their opinion, with an opinion of my own?
No, but we're also allowed to react to your opinion with our own when your only reasoning appears to be "She's a billionaire so she can't possibly actually be having a melty and I appear to be upset that you're saying she is."
I can tell you didn't actually read anything but I am guessing you are hockeybub and that is pretty par for the course for you so as you were soldier
We said she's having a melty. You said she isn't. You're now, apparently, upset that we're arguing why we think she is, in response to you.
The fact that you're resorting to deadnaming and going through great lengths to defend someone as toxic as Rowling is giving off major transphobic vibes. I'm guessing this is your mask off moment.
And this is EXACTLY what I am talking about. You guys read ANYTHING that leans even SLIGHTLY negative and you guys claim that person is "upset" or "having a melty". I am literally just having a conversation on a dead message board lolI know youre having a melty b/c your fee fees are hurt but take a deep breath and calm down
I know youre having a melty b/c your fee fees are hurt but take a deep breath and calm down
The fact that I cannot even refer to a person's alt on gamefaqs anymore without it being called a "mask off" moment and the fact that you think me making 10 posts talking about how much I despise billionaires makes you think I am defending her baffles me more than anything else that has happened thus far. Maybe it wasn't clear but JK rowling is indeed a billionaire.Take a moment, fire up a couple brain cells, and think why that particular username change might have been made and why she has the words "she/her" in her sig now.
The fact that I cannot even refer to a person's alt on gamefaqs anymore without it being called a "mask off" moment and the fact that you think me making 10 posts talking about how much I despise billionaires makes you think I am defending her baffles me more than anything else that has happened thus far
Take a moment, fire up a couple brain cells, and think why that particular username change might have been made and why she has the words "she/her" in her sig now.
So then help me understand. Rowling has done nothing but target trans women in the worst ways. She is unrelenting in her tactics. So what purpose are you serving by coming here and saying "Haha, she's a billionaire and just does this became she's bored"? I'm legitimately asking.
The fact that I cannot even refer to a person's alt on gamefaqs anymore without it being called a "mask off" moment and the fact that you think me making 10 posts talking about how much I despise billionaires makes you think I am defending her baffles me more than anything else that has happened thus far. Maybe it wasn't clear but JK rowling is indeed a billionaire.It's not an alt. I changed my account name. Honestly, I don't care as long as you get the pronouns right.
What purpose do any of our opinions on this topic serve? Do you think that the posts in this topic, be them mine or yours, have any real purpose in the grand scheme of things? Or are we all just giving our opinions in a dead topic on a dead board that maybe 10 people will read before it hits the last page and gets deleted? This a message board.
And this is EXACTLY what I am talking about. You guys read ANYTHING that leans even SLIGHTLY negative and you guys claim that person is "upset" or "having a melty". I am literally just having a conversation on a dead message board lolHes actually laughing, guys. Really.
And this is EXACTLY what I am talking about. You guys read ANYTHING that leans even SLIGHTLY negative and you guys claim that person is "upset" or "having a melty". I am literally just having a conversation on a dead message board lol
You didn't answer my question.
All we said was "She's having a melt down."
That's it. That's all.
You, personally, decided to be upset by that, and tried to argue with us.
Instead of just letting us have our opinion, you decided to try to argue that we're wrong.
Why?
I don't understand how that post did not answer your question. I am not so delusional that I believe making posts on current events is going to serve ANY sort of meaningful purpose past "Human beings giving their opinions like human beings do". This includes my posts.
You do realize that my first post on this subject in this topic was me quoting and AGREEING with someone else that she wasn't having a meltdown, and then every single post after that has been me replying to someone that is quoting me to tell me my opinion is wrong right?
...That literally doesn't change my question/post, at all. Why did you feel the need to agree with them, which is a negative reaction to a thread, instead of just... Letting opinions be, as you're now attempting to argue?
??? So basically just because I agreed with the opinion of a person you don't agree with, I can go fuck myself? Even if it is AGREEING with someone else on their opinion, I should go through the topic and make sure that opinion is the majority before I agree with it right? Man it would be terrible I happen to give an opinion StealThisSheen doesn't agree with it! And while we are at it, fuck that other guy for having the audacity to give that opinion for me to agree with it in the first place! Doesn't he know that wasn't the majority opinion, and he is just being a negative nancy now?
See? This is, certifiably, a melty.
I would genuinely love to know what your prereqs are for when you go to certify something as a melty or not, considering those very loose prereqs were the point of my very first post in the first place.
...That literally doesn't change my question/post, at all. Why did you feel the need to agree with them, which is a negative reaction to a thread, instead of just... Letting opinions be, as you're now attempting to argue? By taking and/or agreeing with a negative reaction to opinions, you were, quite literally, STARTING the argument. Thus, I ask: Why? Why did you feel the need to start and/or support an argument against people whose opinions were, simply, "She's having a melty?"
That would belong to the original poster then since they were the one who posted the original negative opinion.
You were upset people disagreed with your assertion, initially.
You have, since, gotten EXTREMELY more upset, as evident by your previous, almost nonsensical, post.
Thus, you aren't just having a melty, you're having a certifiable melty.
Why do you think I was upset? Did I ever insult anyone? Flame anyone? Call anyone names? Tell them to shut up, or fuck off, stop posting?
??? So basically just because I agreed with the opinion of a person you don't agree with, I can go fuck myself? Even if it is AGREEING with someone else on their opinion, I should go through the topic and make sure that opinion is the majority before I agree with it right? Man it would be terrible I happen to give an opinion StealThisSheen doesn't agree with it! And while we are at it, fuck that other guy for having the audacity to give that opinion for me to agree with it in the first place! Doesn't he know that wasn't the majority opinion, and he is just being a negative nancy now?
Yes:
This is, blatantly, a post attempting to insult me, simply because I disagreed with you. Thus, you are, certifiably, having a melty.
If you could maybe bold the insult in my post I would really appreciate it because I am just not finding it.
The "I didn't technically insult you, I just had a crybaby fit over you not agreeing with me" defense doesn't really work, given your posts in this topic.
lmao magasoldier deployed the waaaah defense and seems confused why it didn't work
Yeah that's about what I thought it was a good try though
If you could bold the part of my post where I make an attempt at pity for myself or really any emotion at all in general or call for anyone to come to my defense I would really appreciate it, thanks
Alright, let me help you out.
You can keep crying about us saying a rich person you, apparently, adore, had a melty.
And we'll keep laughing at you for getting so upset that we said she had a melty.
Hey, you finally learned how opinions work! Turns out maybe our posts in this dead topic on a dead board do have a little meaning afterall.
Everybody is calling you out for getting upset on Rowlings behalf
That is the entirety of it
How do you not get this
How have you not been able to defend your argument at all?
Why are you getting upset on behalf of a billionaire?
You know that this isnt how people normally act, right?