Snarky Hawke redeems 2 mostly.
Honestly, if 2 just had more dungeon layouts it'd have been a fine, fast sequel.
I think Inquisition has better characters than Origins. And the art design is pretty even between the two quality wise imo.
hawke was supposed to be the leader of the inquistion, but the bad reception changed that
Wait, really?There was supposed to be a DLC for DA2 called Exalted March that would have been basically a condensed version of the first act of DAI
Suddenly, so many questions I had about Inquisition make sense.
(I still think that the elf mage as inquisitor romancing Solas has the best RP, but Garret Hawke as inquisitor would still be badass)
Snarky Hawke redeems 2 mostly.Agreed. I hated how people were saying the gameplay got worse when the gameplay had better abilities and cut a lot of lousy ones out like combat tactics as a leveling ability.
Honestly, if 2 just had more dungeon layouts it'd have been a fine, fast sequel.
Yes, the console version made you have to mash buttons to attack, but the PC version still played like a less clunky version of origins.You didn't even need to mash buttons on the console versions. I think the settings were hold the button, or you could just use the Origins method of auto attacking upon targeting.
Origins is a great game.My impression of it so far is that it's a fine enough game, just not a very good Dragon Age game. It definitely feels like a game that took ten years of development time, went through a couple hard resets, and cycled the entire dev team in the meantime.
I think Veilguard will end up being good. From what I've seen it's ditched the open world format, which lets them actually have some structured level design. I do wish the battles were more interactive and strategic with the party though, so far I just do pretty much all the damage with my MC and the other characters are just there to heal me or use combos.
My impression of it so far is that it's a fine enough game, just not a very good Dragon Age game.
You didn't even need to mash buttons on the console versions. I think the settings were hold the button, or you could just use the Origins method of auto attacking upon targeting.It got patched. Originally you had to attack by pressing a button.
I've seen this quite a few times and I'm not sure what people really mean about it.Basically what I've thought.
If the comparison is only to Origins, then sure. But DA2 and Inquisition didn't feel like Origins at all. At this point Origins doesn't feel like a Dragon Age game compared to the other 3.
maybe the success of BG3 will make them go back towards the RPG roots when the next game comes out in like 7 years
Wait, really?
Suddenly, so many questions I had about Inquisition make sense.
(I still think that the elf mage as inquisitor romancing Solas has the best RP, but Garret Hawke as inquisitor would still be badass)
DAII may (rightfully) get criticism for the repetitive dungeon layouts, but its actually my favorite of the series. I think the characters tend ti be much more interesting in that game, and I actually really enjoy the relatively smaller scope of the story.Agreed, I mean there's a reason they keep reusing Varric.
Havent played Veilguard yet and may not for some time, but Ill get there eventually.
Basically what I've thought.What I meant is that it seems to me that they either don't have a very good grasp on their own lore at this point, or just don't care.
Like, every single DA game has been wildly different from the rest of the series.
Saying "this doesn't feel like DA" is almost meaningless.