Sure, but again, why are the ones that are guilty of the crime not getting some scorn. I mean do you think rape is a rare occurence?Why do you think I'm okay with rapists?
Why assume that it is an absolute statement? Do you want them to talk down to you?Because they're the same people who throw out the "bowl of M&Ms" analogy, which posits they should never trust any man just because some might be dangerous.
Maybe they respect the good ones to know that they aren't a target perhaps.
Why do you think I'm okay with rapists?
Because they're the same people who throw out the "bowl of M&Ms" analogy, which posits they should never trust any man just because some might be dangerous.
Sure, but again, why are the ones that are guilty of the crime not getting some scorn. I mean do you think rape is a rare occurence?It isn't rare, and rapists are destroyed for life (as they should) unless they're extremely powerful/rich to get away with it.
Maybe they respect the good ones to know that they aren't a target perhaps.Then they should use their words for it.
The ones raping or being abusive are, yes.My point would be acting altruistic to not be automatically labeled as a monster.
Well that's the thing. If you're insisting all women treat men like shit, it's a bit shaky to still complain about generalizations of men which I have been getting a feeling of in the thread.
But again it's hard to feel for someone who isn't genuinely kind (i.e. Not restricting it to a potential date or just girls/women).
Yeah, I get the whole doing good and getting compensated, but there's a difference between say working for a business with the upfront intent of being paid, and then there is pretending to be an altruistic person to get laid.
One is based on honesty and agreement, the other is falsehood by omission.
Sucks, but when again when people aren't in the best of moods, it is easier to tune out the good.But the guy that has done everything right has to suck it up the complete nonchalant disregarded portrayal of them, right?
No, I was asking if you believe it happens less often than reported? Like how people claimed racism was no longer a problem or arguably even treat it more as an annoyance than serious problem.No, hell it probably happens more often than reported. I actually know that for a fact, on account of me never having reported my rape to any authorities or anything.
Well and this comment earlier "so assuming for a second that the women answering that were largely not assault victims " sounded like you disbelieve it is still a serious frequent issue towards women.No, that's not what I meant. I was working under the assumption that the majority of the women answering were not assault victims.
All women? Because claiming that young men shouldn't be dismissed while doing the opposite to women flys in the face of your concern doesn't it?Where are you getting all women from that?
Where are you getting all women from that?
It just seems like those well sticking up for the young men voting for Trump just seem to think it's only/all women or pro-feminist guys who pushed them to their vote. And not considering say that older guys who value gender roles of old.I'm explaining the actions of Democrats that made them susceptible to right wing grifters.
But the guy that has done everything right has to suck it up the complete nonchalant disregarded portrayal of them, right?
People associated with the Democratic party should really really not do posts like this317K likes
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/fcd9123f.jpg
People associated with the Democratic party should really really not do posts like thisWhere's the lie?
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/fcd9123f.jpg
Where's the lie?
Would you say the same thing if she said "Latino men without college degrees are going to ruin this county?" Or black men?It is allowed to say that to the whites. Now people are feeling that can say the same to Latinos because they didn't vote on what they wanted.
It doesn't fucking matter if it's true or not. You don't fucking say it if you are in any way related to the Democratic party.
And if you're a regular person, it's just being an asshole and you shouldn't stay it either.
It is allowed to say that to the whites. Now people are feeling that can say the same to Latinos because they didn't vote on what they wanted.
She says that men without college is the problem, well, when men said that they didn't feel welcome in university, it was because they "had to work without their privileges".
I wonder how many electoral defeats it needs to take to create some sympathy for the demographic they need but they don't want.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/4/469ef6a5.jpg
I don't get it how an electoral party feels entitled to have voters, but here we are.
I agree but again, I want to emphasize that the vast majority of democratic politicians are NOT saying this stuff. In fact, you have Trump and Vance outright calling cities trash and being demeaning to people.
To be honest, if you went through the internet you will always see some weirdass MAGA supporter saying the most insane bullshit often and also getting criticized for it.And in some cases Vance and Trump amplify it to a national state.
These guys didn't feel welcome, so they left.I'd like to point out that personally I (straight white male with no college degree) don't feel welcome in the Democratic party. I feel tolerated at best.
I'd like to point out that personally I (straight white male with no college degree) don't feel welcome in the Democratic party. I feel tolerated at best.Yeah, I would have voted Democratic too if I was there.
I still vote Democratic anyway because I know it's in my best interest, but not everyone is like that.
but I can't completely blame a group that felt left out and unwelcomed.
Do you hold this level of empathy for other groups when they say they feel left out and unwelcome?I do, thats why I'm leftist.
"It'S tHe MaLe LoNeLiNeSs EpIdEmIc"It wasn't the ONLY point for the loss, but it was one worth mentioning.
no it's not, the cause is social media brainrot. The "male loneliness epidemic" is also the direct result of gen Z men being poorly socialised due to social media brainrot. Stop this fake right wing talking point
But did you hold empathy for this one?Based on my other posts in this topic I think it should be clear that I do.
Do you hold this level of empathy for other groups when they say they feel left out and unwelcome?I certainly do.
For example, the "facts don't care about feelings" group who are now realizing that feeling actually do matter.It always did, psychology always took big parts of politics. This is why populism is always strong. I think this was a talking about Democracy since Ancient Greece.
"It'S tHe MaLe LoNeLiNeSs EpIdEmIc"It's not just Gen Z though. Most of the things brought up ITT can also be applied to millennials. Democrats have failed in reaching out to two generations of men and they're going for a third.
no it's not, the cause is social media brainrot. The "male loneliness epidemic" is also the direct result of gen Z men being poorly socialised due to social media brainrot. Stop this fake right wing talking point
I appreciate the contributions in this topic. Maybe closing the board reduced rampant shit posting, because this feels like best behavior CE on a potentially contentious topic.The fact that it is talked about it instead of appearing a bunch of users trying to bemean it with "boo hoo men" like it used to happen GFaqs says quite a lot.
I do, thats why I'm leftist.
But did you hold empathy for this one?
My instagram algorithm is littered with "men r bad" variants, full of generalisations. I got quite into hinge and bumble dating discussion, and naturally there is more dating content on insta made by women than men, and it pays to make inflammatory hot takes, and yeah. I can see how guys in their teens and early 20s would feel hopeless
I made the choice to just stop looking at my insta feed(the more you click into content the more similar stuff you'll get so my algorithm is ruined now) but some guys just keep reading and driving themselves crazy