What kind of monster hates sexy ai chatbots who just want to flirt with you?Me. I also hate the people who made them.
What kind of monster hates sexy ai chatbots who just want to flirt with you?Well it's probably illegal if you base them off real people. Taylor Swift is probably upset
What kind of monster hates sexy ai chatbots who just want to flirt with you?
Taylor Swift actually has the money to sue Meta and not go away. This is a very stupid idea
Well it's probably illegal if you base them off real people. Taylor Swift is probably upseti dont know if it even is illegal. i cant imagine there's a law on the books covering it yet. honestly sounds like it could be a precedent setting case, and she's rich enough to take it to court.
The techbros feel like they're untouchable now. They really need to be proven wrong.Why wouldn't they feel untouchable? They shit out their fucking AI products and everyone happily uses them to make their bullshit slop. It doesn't matter how many people warn about the harms they cause, the masses gladly indulge in it and they are at zero risk of regulation anytime soon.
What kind of monster hates sexy ai chatbots who just want to flirt with you?Me, I do. It's the dumbest shit I have ever seen, celeb or no, it just seems horribly sad on the user end and incredibly manipulative on the corporate end.
What kind of monster hates sexy ai chatbots who just want to flirt with you?Did you read the article? This crap is generating and sending CP. Its 100% not okay, and I hope Meta gets sued the fuck out of for this
looks like these companies are going the opposite direction of no hornyWhich makes the censorship of media happening right now even weirder.
These people are seriously lacking in some basic fucking moralsWay too many people still try to fit tech bros into the Steve Jobs mold without realizing a metric shitload of them (and almost all of them under 35-40) are just spoiled rich kids with barely any tangible life experience outside of using their parents' money to invest their way into "ideas guy" positions surrounded by yes-men.
Which makes the censorship of media happening right now even weirder.You really see no relation between the rise of AI chatbot that are horny as hell and wanting to censor everything that isn't AI?
You really see no relation between the rise of AI chatbot that are horny as hell and wanting to censor everything that isn't AI?This feels like some crazy conspiracy theory considering basically all the AI companies also make significant efforts to censor their own AI, get it to be less horny, block horny requests, etc
You really see no relation between the rise of AI chatbot that are horny as hell and wanting to censor everything that isn't AI?AI use these very same things as fuel.
i dont know if it even is illegal. i cant imagine there's a law on the books covering it yet.Google says the legal doctrine called right of publicity that prevents the unauthorized commercial use of a persons name, image, voice, or other recognizable aspects of their identity. So, a bot that sounds like Taylor would be illegal without her express permission.
AI use these very same things as fuel.As though corporations don't already have data repositories. Much in the same way you can censor then but anyone with a bit of desire to see it will still easily be able to find a way (not to mention AI already using torrents and the like for data of questionable legality).
If hypothetically everything horny gets censored, AI loses its own fuel.
This feels like some crazy conspiracy theory considering basically all the AI companies also make significant efforts to censor their own AI, get it to be less horny, block horny requests, etcAnd yet you can usually pay to get around those blocks on a number of models.
Everyone is trying to censor that sort of thing, the difference is that they just haven't figured out how to actually get it to work with AI yet
As though corporations don't already have data repositories.Do you honestly believe that corporations would simply decide to give up on free source that they don't have to pay a dime to have? Why do you think artists were the the first to get the shaft? They had 0 protection against this stuff.
Much in the same way you can censor then but anyone with a bit of desire to see it will still easily be able to find a way (not to mention AI already using torrents and the like for data of questionable legality).The same censorship nannies would probably double down against piracy as well. By this logic, AI corporations would be doubling down at nuking pirated contents since they already have their data stored. Afaik, META used a certain book pirated site to souce most of its own info, removing said site that continuosly add more data to be siphoned to AI would be extremely detrimental since there is the possibility another AI company would simply have their own pirated content that doesn't shoot itself in his own foot.