Soall the people the uk arrested for protesting, they gonna get a pay check or something now, right?*cheque
Means nothing is Palestine action is still gonna be recognized as a terrorist organization or whateverMembers of Palestine Action did in fact commit terrorist acts & have been for a long time, so supporting them means you're assosciating with them even if it's a peaceful support, people only see the ignorant peaceful protestors instead of who they're supporting unfortunately (they may be called "Palestine Action" but that's not all they're about):
What does this actually mean for the people in Palestine? Will the UK be supporting them more?
It's sad it has taken so long, but the public pressure worldwide has finally begun forcing elected officials to begin breaking away from their unconditional support of israel.It's just a shame that all this couldn't be happening with President Harris.
In the United states 92% of democratic voters now side with the Palestinians in this conflict (an unimaginable figure just a year ago) and several Democrats who have taken AIPAC money in the past have come out publicly in recent weeks stating they refuse to take AIPAC money. I expect this trend to continue heading into the midterms.
And this gesture by the UK is also an encouraging step in the right direction. Political change doesn't happen overnight, even when there is a genocide involved unfortunately. But we seem to be heading in the right direction.
I hate to be a cynic, but I can't see this as anything other than an attempt to re-capture Labour's evaporating (to Jeremy Corbyn's new party which is explicitly pro-Palestine) Muslim vote, because they simply cannot afford to lose that voting bloc and expect to beat Reform in 2029.its not cynical to look at every action a politician takes with suspicion, because they're all lying assholes willing to do whatever they need to further their goals. sometimes its beneficial to the general population, but its always because they're helping themselves.
I hope I'm wrong.
I know I'm not.
(to Jeremy Corbyn's new party which is explicitly pro-Palestine)Unless he's clarified further, Corbyn's initial description of his party sounded like they support communism rather than socialism or capitalism.
There are many groups that have committed far more violence against people than Palestine Action, which targets defence contractors and the military, and aims only to do property damage. The government keeps asserting that they are extremely violent, but provides no details on all the acts of violence they are alleged to have done.https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/803/pdfs/uksiem_20250803_en_001.pdf
They did, however, commit the unforgiveable crime of severely embarrassing the government and the military by breaking into an airforce base and putting a couple of planes out of action with spray paint.
And because of that, if I did support them, I would be unable to tell you.
Unless he's clarified further, Corbyn's initial description of his party sounded like they support communism.Either you don't understand what he said or you don't understand communism.
*cheque
Either you don't understand what he said or you don't understand communism.To be honest I may have misunderstood what he said as I can't actually remember all of what he said other than "mass redistribution of wealth and power", which sounds like it's a counter to capitalism.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/803/pdfs/uksiem_20250803_en_001.pdf
https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/palestine-action/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/08/11/why-palestine-action-was-proscribed-as-a-terror-group/
https://ngo-monitor.org/ngos/palestine-action/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fergie_Chambers
Just a few examples.
Asserts they 'used violence' with no specifics other than that they scared people with smoke bombs. Government justifying its authoritarian crackdown.It mentions pyrotechnics, not just smoke bombs).
They are protestors who seek to disrupt and damage the corporations and military who are aiding and abetting mass slaughter. They are not terrorising the public. They are branded as terrorists because they target corporations and embarrass the military and the government.It's in 5.2, they don't just disrupt & damage corporations & military who are aiding & abetting mass slaughter. They are also disrupting & damaging corporations & military who:
provide services and supplies to support Ukraine, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
(NATO), Five Eyes allies and the UK defence enterprise
(Sarcasm aside, I actually don't endorse everything Palestinian Action has done. But I do object to seeing peaceful people handcuffed and thrown in the back of a police van for holding a sign. It's a disgrace).I agree but that's because people misunderstand Palestine Action & are objecting to the ban (some just to cause a scene), meanwhile becoming associated with a terrorist group through supporting them means the protestors get arrested, get a background check & are then released if they have no actual ties to the terrorist group.