May not be accurate reportingIronic.
https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/s/92lNZsU240
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/a/a6c8d99a.jpg
how would that not violate the 1st amendment?
Considering you can be self taught certain subjects, this seems classist at best
I don't trust that law. "Only professionals can talk about X" just sounds like a legal way to say "Only the approved message of the government can be stated. Anything else is illegal."Definitely all of these three
Putting aside the anti-freedom side for a second, if that law got implimented in the US, the Trump admin would bend over backwards to justify how PragerU and Asmagold are qualified while actual scitentists and experts are lying for money.
How about we get rid of the degree requirement but keep the requirement to cite your sources and label your AI and other manipulated video or images?Nah, it wouldn't make any difference. Show of hands, CE: who clicked the link in the first post?
Ironic.Jfc
Would you want, say, RFK Jr. dictating to medical professionals across the country what is and isn't acceptable to say online?He is *not* qualified. So, the consensus of actual medical professionals would regulate any claims that he could make, not the other way around.
I don't trust that law. "Only professionals can talk about X" just sounds like a legal way to say "Only the approved message of the government can be stated. Anything else is illegal."Does the Chinese government have to approve academic studies and research over there?
Putting aside the anti-freedom side for a second, if that law got implimented in the US, the Trump admin would bend over backwards to justify how PragerU and Asmagold are qualified while actual scitentists and experts are lying for money.
He is *not* qualified. So, the consensus of actual medical professionals would regulate any claims that he could make, not the other way around.
In case you didn't know, some Youtube videos have a message saying "From an accredited US hospital" or "From a licensed medical practitioner". This should be extended so that any channel can request to have their degree in any discipline on display and it would allow viewers to immediately distinguish between authoritative figures and deluded assholes who like the sound of their own voice too much.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/51841d92.jpg
Is that what you think this would be? In the current anti-intellectual climate of the US that actual doctors and scientists would be the ones whose opinions would be approved?Ideally, for the sake of credibility, but those could become mutually exclusive. In any professional field, consensus is not limited to findings from any one country. If US government approved research does become such an outlier, it will be dropped from international conference discussions and publications.
Ideally, for the sake of credibility, but those could become mutually exclusive. In any professional field, consensus is not limited to findings from any one country. If US government approved research does become such an outlier, it will be dropped from international conference discussions and publications.That doesn't help things when the platforms themselves are American. Sure the rest of the world will say that the research is objectively wrong, but the YouTube video from an American creator would be unaffected. Fundamentally flawed research is already dismissed, that's the whole process of peer reviewing and recreating results. It hasn't helped at all.
This only works in a society that doesn't need it.So, federally, the US is going to become the new Yugoslavia? Anyone remember how that worked-out?
If you pay the fine you can use the 1st as much as you want.My god....
My god....
What an ignorant thing to say.
My god....You're right, I forgot to cite that post.
What an ignorant thing to say.
Sounds good on paperit doesnt, actually