Supreme Court of Canada rules 1 year min. for CP charges unconstitutional

Snip-N-Snails posted...

Is that true? Stuff like Nirvana's cover is considered porn in Canada? If that's the case then yeah that is absolutely the root problem here. And that's why nonsense like teens having pictures of themselves can be classified as CP. That's the realm of broad red state laws.

And shit like that is something that can come about from poorly written laws.

What are you struggling to understand here? Everybody else seems to get it pretty easily.