Gladius_ posted...
Untrue. I had someone correct me with a more recent study that superseded my old study I was using that was conducted back in the 1990's. I was unaware that both a new study was conducted in 2024 and that study contradicted the previous findings. I didn't like the answer but I conceded I was, indeed, wrong.
You arent helping disprove what I just said of doing so with users you typically already agree with. At best this is a nice story.
Gladius_ posted...
You told me outright that my opinion doesn't supersede a venue's either and that I too was putting my own beliefs over a venue's right to their own dress code.
Speaking of misconstrueding my posts. My argument was about not all feminists agree that dressing raunchy is empowerment, and that my post are NOT aboit that venue. You decided to repeatedly keep circling back to the venue to make my posts about the venue, and worse decided twist my post to be all about the venues decision. Using the above to desperately spin all my posts to be about the venue.
Gladius_ posted...
I did not. Again, I have the screenshots
People with petty grudges tend to, so that doesnt surprise me.
And Im certain it cherry picks a post that ignores I consistently stated my posts were not about whatever the venue decided to approve as appropriate or Swenneys (IIRC) dress.
Gladius_ posted...
also conceded that I am slightly hypocritical of not heeding my own advice, by the way, which does run counter to your claim I won't concede a point.
I dont even know how to address the hot mess earlier in your post. But to this in particular..... you conveniently conceding (debateble at that) in the very topic of someone saying you dont concede to people who you typically disagree with, doesnt remotely prove you are a beacon example of someone who concedes to those you typically disagree with.
Its like a friend saying you never share with specifically him, so you decide to conveniently share now with him to argue, "see, this proves I always share with you."