Ok that's fair
I mean I don't agree he generally had bad matches after like 1995 or so, particularly not enough to be considered the poster child of them.
I also love dumb hokey stuff and question why people who are staunchly against it would be into pro wrestling to begin with (and no it's not just a WWE thing WWE just has more of it) so obviously I don't care about that aspect.
But yeah. That's fair. I'm not saying he should have 100% like I was just wondering why it was all the wrestling mega nerds saying no.
No problem!
This is a cute and pop genocide of love!