Community Mafia Topic 7 - The Art of how to post Votals correctly (Sultan C-)

Board 8

Page of 8
Board 8 » Community Mafia Topic 7 - The Art of how to post Votals correctly (Sultan C-)
I Have Advanced Dungeons and Dragons Later Tonight This Isn't a Clue or Anything I Just Announce my Schedule in the Votals:
[0] Peaf - (IGCD), (Isquen), (Kirby), (MI), (Red), (Sbell)
[0] Blade - (Corrik), (Ben), (Chang), (Corrik), (Death), (FD)
[0] Chang - (MI), (Isquen),(IGCD), (Blade), (Peaf)
[0] Wallz- (MI), (IGCD), (corrik), (Ulti), (Mzero)
[0] Kirby - (Ulti), (isquen)
[0] Corrik- (Ben)

With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch. Day ends May the 4th at 6 pm EST.
Lea
This is going to make day 2 votal analysis more annoying, is my biggest gripe
~Peaf~
Post #253 was unavailable or deleted.
Meow1000 posted...
Yeah sorry this isn't fun. We already probably have two scum to lynch (one who is confirmed) and all you did was take over the day to flex your E-peen.
He has the role, what's he supposed to do? And if he just stayed silent good chance he gets lynched today
https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/26864890/
htaeD posted...
Isquen I also would like an explanation

No explanation about it. Blade's being nasty for no reason and if he's town, well, cool, Corrik shot himself in the foot. If he isn't, the attitude is way too much, because while I've been quiet most of the game, I haven't been "I didnt read four topics or twenty posts before a rant idgaf scum will read for me" levels of jackass like SOMEONE here.
[Rock and Stone] <o/
I just watched the video and that was an incredible script, chang. Well done.
~Peaf~
changmas posted...
You should be happy Corrik. Your game just got much easier; you only have to convince one person to kill Blade now.
I wish you had the marbles to kill him. He isn't gonna claim cuz he doesn't respect you as a person and feel like you would do anything about it.

I cannot assure he is scum, but I can assure he is lying about knowing defintiively he was not roleblocked.

The only town motivation here would be to try and draw a shot onto himself, but it really doesn't appear that's what he is going for here.

I can assure you everything I said is legit.

So do with it as you want. But, I wouldn't waste time on Blade cuz he has zero respect for you to do anything you might request. Shoot or move on.

Wallz seems like rolled over scum to me personally.
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
UltimaterializerX posted...
Wall or Corrik are the ONLY lynches you should consider. Theyre both confirmed scum so Ill just let you have your fun and take your pick.

It has dawned on me that if Wall was scum backup, he would have gotten the power immediately upon Knight flipping. And since its obvious scum hasnt had a good night, well.

Kill Corrik first.
I dont think he is backup anyway, but he is certainly not confirmable
Violet IGN: Malta, Sword IGN: Pandora
Home: Pandorian/JBURSQAVTAGA
Isquen posted...
Maybe you shouldn't be literall her, then. I'm not speaking any more about her, or you, unless you try to be your own person and do something useful.

I have no idea what this is based on and how this is deserved.
Violet IGN: Malta, Sword IGN: Pandora
Home: Pandorian/JBURSQAVTAGA
Isquen posted...
Maybe you shouldn't be literall her, then. I'm not speaking any more about her, or you, unless you try to be your own person and do something useful.
Uhoh, did DToast find out they have the same IP address?
https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/26864890/
Isquen posted...
Maybe you shouldn't be literall her, then. I'm not speaking any more about her, or you, unless you try to be your own person and do something useful.
This post only goes to show how completely worthless your opinion is when it comes to me given I predate her here by a decade and have been openly scum hunting while you've been almost entirely inactive.
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in numbers. ~War13104
Never stoop to the level of idiots. They will drag you down and beat you with experience.
PunishedBen posted...
Uhoh, did DToast find out they have the same IP address?
We have at times yes.
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in numbers. ~War13104
Never stoop to the level of idiots. They will drag you down and beat you with experience.
Meow1000 posted...
This post only goes to show how completely worthless your opinion is when it comes to me given I predate her here by a decade and have been openly scum hunting while you've been almost entirely inactive.
Have you been scumhunting?

You keep saying to lynch me today cuz I blew your shit up.
Yesterday you said the lynch on Itzknight was just a scum distraction and tried to downplay that lynch without actively straight out saying so.
Your wallz vote was is good only if he is scum, and lets be honest, way late in the scheme of things. I was way ahead on that vote. Didn't seem like you even really tried to make that lynch move much as well.

So what exactly scumhunting have you done?
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
Corrik7 posted...
Have you been scumhunting?

You keep saying to lynch me today cuz I blew your shit up.
Yesterday you said the lynch on Itzknight was just a scum distraction and tried to downplay that lynch without actively straight out saying so.
Your wallz vote was is good only if he is scum, and lets be honest, way late in the scheme of things. I was way ahead on that vote. Didn't seem like you even really tried to make that lynch move much as well.

So what exactly scumhunting have you done?


page 1 I was talking to lopen, and then blade called me scum for it.

(\____/)
( SBell )
Sleuther stop sleuthing

I'm surprised that no one really cared to tell me my logic from earlier was bad, where i said Wallz could only be scum if mi is.

And sure i think red is scummy too, mi, but putting him up as an option when we have at least one player in front of us deliberately lying feels like kicking the can down the road.
~Peaf~
Obellisk posted...
page 1 I was talking to lopen, and then blade called me scum for it.
Is that scumhunting?
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
The most scummy things I have seen this game are a post wallz made day 1 and a post blade made day 1. Both are single messages that don't read well to me. Blade's moreso in hindsight.

I didn't read most of day 1 and parts of day 2 though. So *shrug*
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
PeaceFrog posted...
And sure i think red is scummy too, mi, but putting him up as an option when we have at least one player in front of us deliberately lying feels like kicking the can down the road.
It's not like chang is going to listen to me here anyway so
We do not have much connection, you and I. Still, this encounter feels special. I hope you won't mind if I think of you as a friend.
Obellisk posted...
page 1 I was talking to lopen, and then blade called me scum for it.
And then Wall soon after
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in numbers. ~War13104
Never stoop to the level of idiots. They will drag you down and beat you with experience.
Corrik7 posted...
Is that scumhunting?

no, I'm team corrik. trying to help
(\____/)
( SBell )
Going back, I think I no longer dislike wallz day 1 post. I misread it methinks lol.
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
wallmasterz posted... I am concerned with finding town, not getting town points. Ulti called me specifically out for not immediately gunning for him (his reasoning was flawed, but nonetheless) and Lopen was tunneling/tunneling Ulti nonstop. Lopen claimed to think I was town. There are reasons I chimed in on Ulti which you neglected to mention.

Ulti usually gets town cleared too easily. I have never fallen into that trap. In Simpsons mafia I was right about Ulti being scum on d2 after I neighbored him but I got talked out of it. I am not saying Im a perfect read on Ulti, but I dont think Ive ever wrongly town cleared him. Usually I suspect the crap out of him until one of us is in the grave. Ulti is so conditioned for this he suspected me for not suspecting him before he even posted

Chang, do you have any town reads besides apparently Ulti? Scum reads? Other people have stated reasons for suspecting me. Some of those reasons are silly but they felt genuine. This post feels like a launching point for you to jump on the mislynch wallz bandwagon if it suits you.


This is the post I didn't like and why I voted him yesterday though. Specifically the bolded part.
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
Kirby is definitely wrong town because he would have to know that I didnt move to fake a jailkeep claim and we already have a dead scum roleblocker.
I need to update my signature.
Corrik, why did you choose to roleblock Blade N1?
Kirby321 is 60% epicsauce, 40% epic failure
Soo... how was your day?
Kirby321 posted...
Corrik, why did you choose to roleblock Blade N1?
He kept saying itsknight was a distraction by scum. And ended up being you know a powerful scum. Seems like indirect defense.
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
wallmasterz posted...
Kirby is definitely wrong town because he would have to know that I didnt move to fake a jailkeep claim and we already have a dead scum roleblocker.
There are other reasons how he could know you didn't move, but regardless his claim and Corrik's contradict anyway
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in numbers. ~War13104
Never stoop to the level of idiots. They will drag you down and beat you with experience.
Corrik7 posted...
He kept saying itsknight was a distraction by scum. And ended up being you know a powerful scum. Seems like indirect defense.
I said that he felt like a distraction exactly 1 time and it was following someone calling MI a distraction. Try again.
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in numbers. ~War13104
Never stoop to the level of idiots. They will drag you down and beat you with experience.
Reminder that Corrik hasn't actually claimed and only claimed an action - since he's saying he has no problem with Kirby's claim co-existing with his, it seems he isn't claiming a full time roleblocker.
We do not have much connection, you and I. Still, this encounter feels special. I hope you won't mind if I think of you as a friend.
I like blades and wallz posts more looking back at more of day 1. However, Blade's seem sneaky at times as well. First he calls itzknight a scum distraction. Then likely bad town. Then "If scum chang is scum too". It's like a spectrum and somewhat hedged.
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
TotallyNotMI posted...
Reminder that Corrik hasn't actually claimed and only claimed an action - since he's saying he has no problem with Kirby's claim co-existing with his, it seems he isn't claiming a full time roleblocker.
I claimed my flavor.
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
I do believe Chang needs to make this decision on his own today. I withdraw any and all advice in the matter. I know I would be getting all the information I wanted though if I had a host confirmed Day vig that ends the day as well.
Xbox Live User Name - Corrik PSN User Name - Corrik7
Currently playing: Control (X1)
Corrik7 posted...
I like blades and wallz posts more looking back at more of day 1. However, Blade's seem sneaky at times as well. First he calls itzknight a scum distraction. Then likely bad town. Then "If scum chang is scum too". It's like a spectrum and somewhat hedged.

Callng chang scum if Knightz is scum is not only a typical town thing to say, but also fair.
I will agree that I am wary of Blade's brief focus on MI near the end of day4
Violet IGN: Malta, Sword IGN: Pandora
Home: Pandorian/JBURSQAVTAGA
Whew, taking the morning off work does a body good.

And Chang that video was amazing. I realized what you were doing just a few seconds before the music kicked in and just about cackled through the rest. "It's a Winger Speech, he's doing the thing!"

I still think you were being an ass day 1, but I'm much more forgiving of someone who unilaterally controls the lynch >_>

Personally I would suggest taking Blade out of your options. If we believe Kirby (and I do) then Corrik is lying town or lying scum, and in either case it makes Blade's defense of the roleblock claim legit. I guess he could be a scum investigative role that knows he wasn't RB'd, but then Corrik's motivations would make even less sense.

And if you're feeling spicy, consider Red, because other than antagonizing me I can't think of a single thing he's done this game.
~C~ FD
http://i.imgur.com/dGDfxaw.png
Red called me town <.<
Which is more than he did last game
(even if it would have been a lie back then)
Violet IGN: Malta, Sword IGN: Pandora
Home: Pandorian/JBURSQAVTAGA
Oh right, updated sheet:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/c/ca3967fc.png

Did IGCD claim flavor with his side quest and i missed it?
~C~ FD
http://i.imgur.com/dGDfxaw.png
Oh I suppose I can take the question mark off of ctes claim since Chang was unable to move his vote today.
~C~ FD
http://i.imgur.com/dGDfxaw.png
Forceful_Dragon posted...
Oh right, updated sheet:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/c/ca3967fc.png

Did IGCD claim flavor with his side quest and i missed it?
Yes
All posters and events depicted in this post are entirely fictitious. Any similarity to actual events or posters, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
You gonna help me out or make me dig through 3,000 posts
~C~ FD
http://i.imgur.com/dGDfxaw.png
Zzz, nvm I found it. You could have saved me 10 minutes ya jerk. Chang, put my vote on IGCD.

Though tbh the flavor works out amazingly for a character that gets a gun on a delayed reaction. I'm thinking of the one episode in particular where Jeff invents a class on conspiracy theories that he doesn't actually have and it ends up in a series of characters "betraying" each other and staging a series of mock shootings with prop guns before Cackowski shows up for the final fake shooting to set them all straight on the dangerous of prop guns.

I would also have accepted Annie because it's discovered randomly in season 3 that she carries a gun in her purse (due to living in a bad neighborhood at that point), but I feel like Annie is known for so many other things that it would be strange to reduce her to that.
~C~ FD
http://i.imgur.com/dGDfxaw.png
I'm starting to get concerned that whatever is going on between Corrik and Blade is a retread of "Insane Psychic" Mafia. Corrik and Blade are both insisting heavily that the other is wrong, but there's a blatant contradiction and neither are letting up. I don't see the scum equity in Corrik gambiting this hard, and Blade very easily could've gone the Wallz route and claimed something that couldn't have been roleblocked N1.
Kirby321 is 60% epicsauce, 40% epic failure
Soo... how was your day?
So the theory is corrik has an "insane" role that THINKS it can roleblock someone without them knowing? Or that Blade has an "insane" role that returned a result despite having actually been roleblocked?
~C~ FD
http://i.imgur.com/dGDfxaw.png
Forceful_Dragon posted...
Zzz, nvm I found it. You could have saved me 10 minutes ya jerk. Chang, put my vote on IGCD.
Sorry I'm working and drive for a living
All posters and events depicted in this post are entirely fictitious. Any similarity to actual events or posters, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
My theory was that Corrik was just gambiting
I have no idea why Sbell believes him so much either
Violet IGN: Malta, Sword IGN: Pandora
Home: Pandorian/JBURSQAVTAGA
Forceful_Dragon posted...
And if you're feeling spicy, consider Red, because other than antagonizing me I can't think of a single thing he's done this game.
Plus, if we count the mi eod voters as sus, except for chang and Ulti, Red is in that list! Plus me :)
~Peaf~
htaeD posted...
My theory was that Corrik was just gambiting
I have no idea why Sbell believes him so much either

everyone needs a cheer leader.
(\____/)
( SBell )
Forceful_Dragon posted...
So the theory is corrik has an "insane" role that THINKS it can roleblock someone without them knowing? Or that Blade has an "insane" role that returned a result despite having actually been roleblocked?

More like they're both probably town but there's missing information somewhere that makes it seem like there's a contradiction.

Like, I was never told who I targeted. Does Corrik know for 100% certain that he targeted Blade N1?
Kirby321 is 60% epicsauce, 40% epic failure
Soo... how was your day?
Red did have the fact that Knightz inexplicably called him town.
Do we think Knightz already mastered the rule of 3?
Violet IGN: Malta, Sword IGN: Pandora
Home: Pandorian/JBURSQAVTAGA
htaeD posted...
My theory was that Corrik was just gambiting

That was my initial theory, because, y'know, it's corrik.

But then he's since tripled down and even provided a justification why Blade of all people was his choice to block. It's just weird and running longer than you would expect a town corrik gambit to last.

.

Kirby321 posted...
More like they're both probably town but there's missing information somewhere that makes it seem like there's a contradiction.

Like, I was never told who I targeted. Does Corrik know for 100% certain that he targeted Blade N1?

We already know of 1 town redirection ability (that didn't even act N1) so it would be reliant on a scum redirection of some kind. Throwing that in the mix makes the entire interaction even more coincidental and complex.
~C~ FD
http://i.imgur.com/dGDfxaw.png
inb4 corrik and Blade are scum and the goal is to flip one so the other coasts to victory.
(\____/)
( SBell )
Mental note that Ben looks good for making a good overview of the Tacoknight clash that decidedly landed on lynching Knightz and not Taco.
Violet IGN: Malta, Sword IGN: Pandora
Home: Pandorian/JBURSQAVTAGA
Board 8 » Community Mafia Topic 7 - The Art of how to post Votals correctly (Sultan C-)
Page of 8