Friends Mafia Topic 7 - The Final One

Board 8

Page of 4
Board 8 » Friends Mafia Topic 7 - The Final One
Lopen gonna cure all of us through the power of friendship.
Can't we give ourselves one more chance?
Trying my best. If I fail, let me know.
SirChris posted...
Lopen gonna cure all of us through the power of friendship.

I didnt want to spoil it that Lopen was using 5D chess, youre too busy to harm yourself when youre stuck in an endless argument with Lopen.
I need to update my signature.
Lopen posted...
I just think we'd veer pretty far into discussion of the field of psychological testing and such and I'm not sure anyone wants to read my ramblings on that

I'll just say I don't think I've not been supportive in this topic. Loving maybe not exactly but like yeah. If it felt overly hostile I apologize
I do lol. Psychology has always been a very interesting subject to me, I wish I hadn't been so bored in school and had the drive to actually try in school, because psychology is 100% one of the career paths I would have very much considered. Like I had one of the highest averages in my graduating class and literally did next to 0 actual work on anything.
All posters and events depicted in this post are entirely fictitious. Any similarity to actual events or posters, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
wallmasterz posted...
I didnt want to spoil it that Lopen was using 5D chess, youre too busy to harm yourself when youre stuck in an endless argument with Lopen.
Lol
All posters and events depicted in this post are entirely fictitious. Any similarity to actual events or posters, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
wallmasterz posted...
I didnt want to spoil it that Lopen was using 5D chess, youre too busy to harm yourself when youre stuck in an endless argument with Lopen.
I feel like this is literally the purpose of weekly therapist meetings
_foolmo_
he says listen to my story this maybe are last chance
So I mean the gist of the rant in my head is this.

Psychological testing, as in like, design of studies designed to approach psychological norms and stuff. It's actually a field of study on its own and isn't simple. It's because there's just a ton of variance in how people react to things creating a standardized testing set is difficult. It's brain chemistry sure but there are things in the personality, experiences, relationship with the person giving the advice, etc that influence how people are going to take any given treatment.

So I mean when you say "you're objectively wrong to ever be anything 100% but loving and supportive at all times when dealing with people who suffer from depression" to me feels like you read some studies and are taking way more from them than you maybe should. They are generally broad strokes and I highly doubt any formal studies have been compared between "total love and compassion" vs "harsh but trying to be helpful" and even if there were it would be of dubious use to cite because everyone is different.

The role of a psychiatrist is to establish a relationship with the patient and determine what the best course of action is by understanding the patient and growing a relationship with them. I would say yes they should never be mean, and I would say yes they should always be supportive, but I don't think love and kindness are always the best tool for them to use. This of course depends on the situation, the patient, their rapport with the patient.

Some people simply do respond better when told more bluntly and a support circle that is too kid gloves with them can put them into an apathetic state or a state where they get some sort of form of community by being one who suffers from depression which itself can be harmful. I can't cite a study on this per se, only anecdote. But I feel anecdote when taken with some use of empathy and intuition, as psychology goes, is useful, because it's simply not something we can approach purely statistically yet. Maybe in the future we'll develop ways to measure things beyond "you are not producing enough of this chemical or are producing too much of this other one" but at the moment we aren't there yet.

But this is just musings from a guy who grew up in a poor community and has a lot of experience dealing with people who have depression in close personal relationships as a result, has struggled with depression himself despite not currently identifying as someone who is suffering from it, and has taken some courses (I took quite a lot of them because I find it interesting but not enough to have a degree just fill a bunch of elective slots in my degree). There are some people I would never be as bluntly harsh as I have been with you here, but although we aren't close I do know you at least a little over the years here and my perception was you could take it at worst wouldn't be harmful. And there are some people that I know where I know receiving that kinda input from me or others has legitimately helped them (myself included from around 5 years ago, again, if I count) so I figured I'd give my two cents just in case it did help at all.

Also yes 5d chess moves unironically help sometimes!
No problem!
This is a cute and pop genocide of love!
Lopen posted...
Psychological testing, as in like, design of studies designed to approach psychological norms and stuff. It's actually a field of study on its own and isn't simple. It's because there's just a ton of variance in how people react to things creating a standardized testing set is difficult. It's brain chemistry sure but there are things in the personality, experiences, relationship with the person giving the advice, etc that influence how people are going to take any given treatment.
You're right, there are so many variables that affect how a person copes with anything really. Like genetics plays a part, trauma, diet, lifestyle, mood, it so far has been hard to pin point the exact reasons/causes for mental illness. So far what we know is that all of that can play a part. At what level each plays a part is unknown and it's something we as a species are still trying to figure out.

Lopen posted...
So I mean when you say "you're objectively wrong to ever be anything 100% but loving and supportive at all times when dealing with people who suffer from depression" to me feels like you read some studies and are taking way more from them than you maybe should. They are generally broad strokes and I highly doubt any formal studies have been compared between "total love and compassion" vs "harsh but trying to be helpful" and even if there were it would be of dubious use to cite because everyone is different.
I mean that isn't what I said, and I think you're conflating love/support with something else, because being harsh while trying to be helpful doesn't necessarily mean you're not being loving or supportive. Because again, people can and do express themselves differently. Being loving and supportive is about making sure the other person feels heard, knows that you're there for them, and helping with what you can/are comfortable within your own personal boundaries.

For example, let's say you have an adult child that is addicted to drugs and they've spent the better part of the last decade stealing from you to support their habit. You'd be well within your right to kick them out and I wouldn't think you were any less loving or supportive of them for that. It depends on how you handle it, like if you found out your kid smoked a joint one time and disowned them I would absolutely never believe you ever loved or supported that child, but with kicking out your adult child and telling them that they are not welcome to live there due to their actions but you are more than willing to help them find the resources they need to stay safe and/or get clean, 100% absolutely loving and supportive in that situation.
Lopen posted...
Some people simply do respond better when told more bluntly and a support circle that is too kid gloves with them can put them into an apathetic state or a state where they get some sort of form of community by being one who suffers from depression which itself can be harmful. I can't cite a study on this per se, only anecdote. But I feel anecdote when taken with some use of empathy and intuition, as psychology goes, is useful, because it's simply not something we can approach purely statistically yet. Maybe in the future we'll develop ways to measure things beyond "you are not producing enough of this chemical or are producing too much of this other one" but at the moment we aren't there yet.
As for this, I personally believe it is more of a time and place kind of thing. From my experience when people are in a more depressive state being harsh on them doesn't help and making them feels worthless when they are already doing that to themselves only makes ot worse, but when they are a bit more together sitting them down and making sure they hear what you need them to hear is easier because they can be more receptive.
Lopen posted...
But this is just musings from a guy who grew up in a poor community and has a lot of experience dealing with people who have depression in close personal relationships as a result, has struggled with depression himself despite not currently identifying as someone who is suffering from it, and has taken some courses (I took quite a lot of them because I find it interesting but not enough to have a degree just fill a bunch of elective slots in my degree). There are some people I would never be as bluntly harsh as I have been with you here, but although we aren't close I do know you at least a little over the years here and my perception was you could take it at worst wouldn't be harmful. And there are some people that I know where I know receiving that kinda input from me or others has legitimately helped them (myself included from around 5 years ago, again, if I count) so I figured I'd give my two cents just in case it did help at all.
I mean typically when I am "normal" there isn't anything anyone can say to me that won't roll off my back, but when I am in a depressive state even people trying to empathize make me feel worse because I start to believe they are just faking it and they don't actually care and blah blah blah. It's a really fucked up thing to go through.
All posters and events depicted in this post are entirely fictitious. Any similarity to actual events or posters, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
I think at this point we're just disagreeing semantics of what is considered a "depressive state" what is "harsh" etc don't really think we are disagreeing in principle.

Like you are saying this

IfGodCouldDie posted...
From my experience when people are in a more depressive state being harsh on them doesn't help and making them feels worthless when they are already doing that to themselves only makes ot worse

I don't think at any point when I was going after you in this topic you were in a severe enough state to have this reaction. If you were I apologize but you seemed like you were being a bit more normal IGCD at that point. I waited till the day after to really give you a bit of harshness for it. Day of it was more a "that's lame, oh well" kinda deal.

But like yes obviously in the middle of a breakdown I'd never do that nor expect it to be helpful. There's also some people I know I just wouldn't ever do that with period because they're very fragile.

However I don't think it's a "you have to wait until they're in a fairly good mood" thing either. It has to be relatively close proximity to the screw up timewise to be effective imo.

But yes kicking your kid out who was stealing to abuse drugs is absolutely the kind of thing I'm talking about. So we agree more than not imo.
No problem!
This is a cute and pop genocide of love!
Here is something else. The unused journals.

Peaf's Night 1 Journal

If you're reading this it's too late. Great job on Sultan. Lopen and Kirby have been invaluable. Chang, Wallz, Sbell, and igcd are lock town in our book.

Blade and ben are probably town, Kirby feels more strongly about Blade being town than lopen and Peaf do. Their respective attacks and vote on Sultan could be bussing, but after review we find this unlikely. In Blade's case, it's easy to see his train of thought on Sultan as finding me scummier for fair reasons - except that in 2.120 he says he has no read on Sultan.
However, the way he handled Dumey and sultan at eod feels town.

I rescind my town clear of death, and lopen feels very strongly that death is scum.

T2.331 from death and t1.198 from dumey both like bad in retrospect after Sultan's flip. Pressure them. The case against Dumey isn't strictly that he defended Sultan, it's how he interacted with him on the Miller claim and then hard defended him. T2.88 is another post that looks worse after Sultan's flip.

Of the "inactives", we feel best about Corrik and worst about mzero.

JC says please stop playing mafia while driving, it's bad for you.

Foolmo's Night 2 Journal:

Why me lmao, I have nothing.

But I can confirm that someone gave me this ability tonight, and I have constructed this message with a secret code that they can use to prove their claim, when they choose to. It will be very easy to verify their claim, and it's related to the mechanics of the ability. Don't overthink it.

Some ideas...
Ben started the momentum against Corrik, Dumey sealed it
Corrik hints Peaf and Death town
Ben defends IGCD and Wallz while fingering Corrik
Chang actually buries Corrik by moving off Dumey, by saying there was no traction, but with my Dumey vote it would have been three on Dumey and two on Corrik
I finger Ben and Chang hard for this
Sbell or IGCD to round out their team
The only question is why Ben and Chang would be so early on Sultan D1 like that

And now a Sonic and Friends fanfic written by GPT...
Sonic sped into Central Perk, skidding to a stop before Rachel. "Fancy a race, Rachel?" he grinned. She laughed, grabbing her coffee. "Only if there's caffeine at the finish line!" He winked, "Deal. You're on!" And they dashed out together. The End.

Chang's Night 3 Journal:

Chang never sent anything.

Death's Night 4 Journal:

Delicious.
Foolmo has to be town who saved me night3
Chang clearly lied.. for some reason. He cant very well poison himself
Why he did not just roleblock Foolmo to get a clean kill, I dont know. I worry this still means a 4man scumteam.
But at least the role PM implies no independents exist (exactly like Ben stated in topic 5)

But then what stopped their kill night2? Chang probably blocked Foolmo.
It cant be the mystery that changs role PM refers to in the final sentence, since Chang still got his gun.
Maybe they skipped their NK to ensure that Peaf got a gun. If so, Dumey looks better since Dumey was suspected a lot day2/3.
Also remember that due to the taunt, Dumey cannot be scum result stealer. And Dumey was the first to propose the 'lynch Chang before he Dies' Plan (which IGCD supported early)

Flatly Wallz looks worst day4. But scum could have just bussed Chang from the getgo.
Ben was at least calling Chang a possible liar early, while Wallz kept pointing towards Ben and Dumey
Basically Foolmo>Dumey>IGCD>Ben>Wallz IMO

Good luck.

And the 5th was posted with Death's flip.
Guinness Book of World Records is the name of the diary that belongs to azuarc , the winner of the Game of the Decade II guru contest.
Chang was already doomed, but I still should have asked him what his journal was about
Violet IGN: Malta, Sword IGN: Pandora
Home: Pandorian/JBURSQAVTAGA
Tldr; read foolmo's chatgpt stuff lol
Guinness Book of World Records is the name of the diary that belongs to azuarc , the winner of the Game of the Decade II guru contest.
It's pretty funny looking back at how off we were n1! A+ bussing.

Foolmo had the best journal by far.
~Peaf~
Sonic sped into Central Perk, skidding to a stop before Rachel. "Fancy a race, Rachel?" he grinned. She laughed, grabbing her coffee. "Only if there's caffeine at the finish line!" He winked, "Deal. You're on!" And they dashed out together. The End.

lmao
I need to update my signature.
htaeD posted...
Chang was already doomed, but I still should have asked him what his journal was about

i meant to write a fake one i just forgot and was busy
The Artist Formerly Known as Hannyabal
ctesjbuvf posted...
I finger Ben and Chang hard for this
I like how I posted this early D3 but they still let me live (although the JK claim did change my mind)

Also the trick with my journal is it's exactly 200 words, which is why I asked GPT for some extra words to fill it out
_foolmo_
he says listen to my story this maybe are last chance
Board 8 » Friends Mafia Topic 7 - The Final One
Page of 4