people rarely type but often use the contraction "who'll"

Board 8

Board 8 » people rarely type but often use the contraction "who'll"
Chaeix
09/08/2025
04:19 AM
#1
this thought is brought to you by not wanting to go to sleep until my phone battery which is at 1% dies
we're all buds ~jc~
<DeathChicken> you are my hero for being the first person to cite National Geographic in Mercs
Chaeix
09/08/2025
04:20 AM
#2
damn it was meant to say speak not use

hoodwinked yet again
we're all buds ~jc~
<DeathChicken> you are my hero for being the first person to cite National Geographic in Mercs
Leonhart4
09/08/2025
07:10 AM
#3
But how often do they say "whom'll?" That's the real question.
https://imgur.com/WqDcNNq
https://imgur.com/89Z5jrB
Chaeix
09/09/2025
04:59 AM
#4
but if we ask the question whomll reply?
we're all buds ~jc~
<DeathChicken> you are my hero for being the first person to cite National Geographic in Mercs
azuarc
09/09/2025
08:42 AM
#5
Chaeix posted...
but if we ask the question whomll reply?

That's not the dative case, so it wouldn't use whom, but for whom'll it matter?
Only the exceptions can be exceptional.
HanOfTheNekos
09/09/2025
08:51 AM
#6
I don't know if this is definitive.

Who'll and who will are just a lazy W away from being the same thing. It could just be that you're used to hearing it spoken in a lazy way like... "Wha' do you mean" in place of "what", since a d and t are close.

Of course, you're from Vancouver so results inconclusive.
"Bordate is a pretty shady place, what with the gangs, casinos, evil corporations and water park." - FAHtastic
Chaeix
09/09/2025
12:55 PM
#7
attacking Vancouver like some wholligan, my goodness
we're all buds ~jc~
<DeathChicken> you are my hero for being the first person to cite National Geographic in Mercs
foolm0r0n
09/09/2025
01:12 PM
#8
If you took a linguistics class y'all'd've known how fun contractions are
_foolmo_
he says listen to my story this maybe are last chance
Board 8 » people rarely type but often use the contraction "who'll"