I leave that to Puerto Ricans to decide. To my recollection, no vote listing all three options (statehood, independence, or status quo) has managed to garner more than 50 percent of the vote so I'm okay with the status quo until that happens.https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/9/9bd315b9.png
AI?knightoffire wouldn't have posted it otherwise.
It's an entirely different aspect of the situation and honestly I think you are just totally missing the point here. AI subtitling would be about the quality of the text and translation itself while this article is entirely about other aspects, such as layout, placement, subtitle tracking, etcI realize that. It, however, doesn't change the statements I made. The loss of people was to shift over to AI, the change in software was because the old one wasn't going to use AI, etc. Yes, one can come up with other reasons for any of the singular aspects, such as money related ones being the reason for staff being let go, but it doesn't change the fact that so many of the changes also relate directly to their AI push. The fact that the article doesn't go over that as much is more a failing on the article's part than me not understanding what they are saying.
Basically in summary it talks about how the standardization away from an anime-specialized tool towards a general subtitling tool, as pushed by netflix and amazon prime, is trashing the one major thing crunchyroll had that made its subtitles look so much nicer than everyone else in the business. because they're being dragged towards using a subtitling tool and format that may work okayish for live action but is not great in anime, which has a much higher amount of on-screen text. It's the subtitling process that gets you garbage like this
How the fuck am I older than the admin?Get in line for the canes, grandpa.
I'm not even one of the older users.
??? did you even read any of it, it's maybe like 1% about AI at mostCrunchyroll, very specifically, has been on a "replacing the paid humans with AI" thing. It is less about me not reading the article and more me knowing more about the situation than the article went over.
https://daiz.moe/crunchyroll-is-destroying-its-subtitles-for-no-good-reason/TBF, there is no group that calls for AI slop more than the "subtitles-only weeb" crowd. This is the future they called for.
neat article about the past and (potential) future of anime subs
the post above mine while 4's story was alright (outside of a very....specific part)Naw, it was complete garbage pretty much the second that it started. It leads on simple bad writing with stuff like the whole "the MC switches to a sword because these specific bugs are immune to it and doesn't switch back because the writers wanted him to have a sword the whole time" and ends on "Lol, best hope you didn't like basic continuity from about 30 minutes ago."
I still wouldn't count it though, since those forms were clearly designed alongside their originals while that gen was being created. It's not the same as a new evolution or form being designed separately from the originals and added later on. While Gamefreak were designing Magmar for gen 1, I strongly doubt they were thinking what its evolution would look like in gen 4. While they were designing Ampharos for gen 2, I strongly doubt they were thinking about a mega evolution coming in gen 6. But while they were designing Shaymin for gen 4, they were clearly creating both of its forms at the same time and basing them off each other at the conceptual level. Likewise with Diancie and its mega evolution in gen 6. That's the difference IMO.We have already established that you wouldn't count it, which is irrelevant to me saying the opposite. Whether you add on other unsubstantiated rationale is irrelevant.
That new form debuted in the same gen that Shaymin did, so I don't think we can call it a "new" form so much as a form it came with right out of the box. I thought about saying Mega Diancie, but it's the same situation as Sky Form Shaymin. Both Diancie and its mega debuted in the same gen.Same Gen, sure, but not the same game so it wasn't really "out of the box" for anyone who played during that Gen.
but I am fairly certain we have not seen any of the mythicals get new forms/megas have we?Shaymin absolutely has gotten a new form.
I'd kick his ass, but he's probably an adult by now.Pretty confident they are no longer an adult if the bird was shot in 1900.
Some wars are worth fighting.Sadly, in this case the burrito was pretty mid.
What you on about? That sounds yummy. Just a paella dish in a wrap.There was quite literally nearly a war between Britain and Spain because of a paella burrito.
This is sacrilegiousCould be worse.
As I said, this is not a sustainable system. History shows what will happen to the wealthy elites if they push things too far. The only question is if they will change the easy way (like progressivism in the early 20th century) or the hard way (like France in the late 18th century).We already have a large chunk of the population that will go to bat for them even in the middle of getting screwed over. Those things will absolutely not happen in America, and the rest of the world is going to get dragged along in the consequences department.
If anything, it would probably encourage more countries to start allowing it as well. "If the U.S. can do it, so can we!"Nah. They already would have done it if the US doing it mattered.
DAWYNE "THE LICK" JOHNSONPlease refrain from licking the Johnson.
You don't understandThe chef is black.
They put women in my Vidya :(
... So it can't be anything with an O in it, huh.Correct. It can only be "buck" or "muck."
Oh we have more than one?Sadly, yes.
If we are arguing the extremes, I would think a game is too easy would have no way of making it harder. I am talking about a game being too easy to the point that all you have to do is hit a button when the game requires it. How do you make that harder? You can't, the game has you do the easiest of inputs to win. You cannot lose as the game just waits for you.That is the visual novel genre.
That is where that argument is going if you do both extremes like the other person is trying to start with the "too" hard logic.
Seems rather unlikely, lolhttps://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/2/275ad757.png
is Friends the only show they let the AI watch?They probably put Friends in the prompt.
That goes back to us Gen-Xers.And 420 is something from the Boomers. And 6 7 is a reference to a song.
The premise seemed interesting but ultimately I was disappointed, probably won't watch season 2. Falls into a very formulaic structure that I guess is just a part of the genre these days."These days."
WhoHitler.
Yeah I done goofed.Fake millennial.
When its ajar :3And thus my dad joke quota is met.
What if he slips and falls instead, then?If he hasn't built up enough momentum to have his magic stop him from slipping then he just slips like a normal person.
ok its time for yaoi dracula x frankenstein thenBold of you to assume that there isn't a weeb who hasn't made one yet.
I always wondered. If the Juggernaut trips, is he just done for?He cannot trip. Whatever was blocking his foot would be destroyed before he could stumble.
Theyll occasionally let the mask slip too much and then they go away.True, but even then a fair number of them sit on the "I'm only getting Warned" fence, and they just wait the 30 days out before coming back.
I don't think this is totally true, you can enjoy something you have no chance of ever beatingIf you are still having fun then it is merely just hard. It becomes "too hard" once you no longer have the ability to have fun. The fact that you eventually will get walled in a hard game, thus turning it from "hard" to "too hard", doesn't really change that fact. The entire transition hinges upon the point at which you go "yeah, this ain't happening" and no longer finding the grind enjoyable. Assuming the thing is beatable at all.
How is a game too hard if you're beating it and enjoying the experience?If you are still enjoying it then it isn't "too hard."
so why would you sayDefinitely the whole "having functioning eyes" bit.
Pokimane avatar could totally share a class with Nemona
alternatively if they decided Nemona was a 25 year old no one would question it
how old is this avatar?15-16.
answer honestly
It loses the intricacies your brain sees and perceives as age markers but at the same time pokimane probably looks younger than her age anyways to many peoplePretty sure absolutely no one is confusing that avatar with a child. Not seeing 29 is one thing, but I'd struggle to believe that you aren't proving TC's point if that's the example you give.
I dont care if it was.At least you are willing to say that what you said, in polite terms, was trolling that you don't actually think is true.
They were just my personal thoughts and opinions on the matter and Im under no obligation to elaborate further.
Hell Im not even sure they want me to.
I like those vignettes where the characters are just meandering about town and being casual. Those moments don't seem to translate too well in the anime cause, well, they're boring, and anime is a dynamic visual medium. I think taking frieren off the page just causes it to lose those moments that make the manga amazing.Animating them doesn't remove them. It just puts them in motion.