Dark Young Link posted... Isn't using his facebook like that kind of a low blow though?
Lol there isn't much on there that he can troll me with, nor is there anything on there that isn't common knowledge on here. He'll I welcome questions XD
As for ulti's trolling, just ignore it. He barely knows anything that he's talking about on there XD
Gotta have respect for yourself if you expect anything worthwhile from anyone else, especially the opposite sex. Granted I'm both inexperienced and believe that sex should be a spiritual thing, but it makes sense that putting someone on a pedestal is a free pass for them using you.
Though I personally consider friendzoning and the ladder theory to be the same thing, excuses.
Oh I don't deny that there are girls that act that way, but they aren't actually interested in you. But yeah, the whole point is that you shouldn't whine or blame the girl because they don't want to date you, which is essentially what "friendzone" boils down to.
UltimaterializerX posted... From: DragonsDance | #010 Not really considering it doesn't exist :) It does for ugly people. Beta males will never experience how women actually act, but girls are also incapable of not letting a guy down easily, especially when most men are pathetic enough to give any remotely attractive woman anything she wants. If some girl can keep a provider around without ever sleeping with them, of course they'll do it and I don't blame them. Any pathetic man deserves to be treated that way. The quickest way to get friendzoned by every girl you know is putting them on a pedestal they don't deserve.
PartOfYourWorld posted... Obviously she wouldn't be attracted to you, but it might not be for physical liabilities like obesity or ugliness. You could be a decent looking pansy, that'd do it too.
Pretty much.
The point is that she's not just arbitrarily ignoring the prospectives. There are none.
The fact that there is no national standard for compensating people wrongly jailed for crimes.
Not only is there no national standard, but apparently the majority of the states don't have them either, and of the over 100 people in the last several years(quoting length from memory so don't hold it to me) exonerated on new DNA evidence, only 12 have actually been compensated, and many weren't even given so much as a formal apology.
And for the record, I'm not saying that this compensation should be attempting to make up for the several years of their life left, I'm saying they should get it because this kind of mistake is life-ruining, and this is money the people are essentially going to need to be able to live.
FartAstronaut69 posted... DragonsDance posted... Makes sense that of the three major social boards, B8 is the only one that would have people honestly defending this XFD
yep everyone here loves drunk driving so you should probably leave so you don't have to be around all of us awful people
Oh there are still a small handful of good people around here I stick around for :)
Theon_Greyjoy posted... Isn't this the guy who told Commodore his friend deserved to die
More or less, and I apologized personally and publicly for it later. Not precisely that I was wrong, just that it was a terrible time and place to say it.
ImTheMacheteGuy posted... DragonsDance posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... DragonsDance posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... s***... I just marked you because I didn't read the topic fully. I thought you said "If you are drunk, you're scum" and I am drunk, so I was pissed, but I did not read the topic right.
On the other hand, I completely disagree. People use the term "drunk" too loosely in regard to driving and often times society will villify a driver who had been drinking (but was not above the legal limit) as a "drunk driver" if an accident occurred and he/she was involved even it not at fault. It's not a good thing to do, but people who see it as absolute, well-definted black and white piss me off. I've been in the car with drunk drivers well over hundreds of times in the past 10 years and the reason no accidents have ever occurred goes beyond luck. Not advocating drunk driving, but "just saying"
If you've been bleeepldy drinking and you're driving blerp dee gobble, you're a terrible gooble derpity person. It may or may not be geeble gop legal, but that doesn't make leeeebledorp it any glob better.
It's very well defined and black and white.
you don't know me well enough to have an opinion... ESPECIALLY if your ass is f***ing joyrock... ESPECIALLY.
No, I do.
If you've been drinking(that is, more than one drink) and you go for a drive, you're awful.
End of story.
I don't have to know ANYTHING personal about you to know this.
GHHsla alyelsttt, ajjs tjios. QWJ%# mothershhaeees, hejkwj keuwnf na kan kkkew whEje 556jDE f*an2l3 dla --3kd jw3 sj jjsjjsjla alk3 wl:D d 23nnf@ dska! #jr4 f***ing idiotj e2 nam3k,kkkk, jm3n 34 so youwj2r3djnn nnnn2 nwkododdl2 lele le3led h ehfg 3n2nd llwjdufyb nwhwb owod swo sowsdkas nnned oa wn e
I don't have to know ANYTHING personal about you to know that whatever the f*** I just said had 20x the logic behind it as any s*** you've said tonight.
Coming from the guy trying to defend drunk driving. Nothing you say has any logic behind it.
Robazoid posted... What if a madman has a gun trained on my wife and baby and the only way he'll let them live is if I drink three drinks and then circle around the block once in my car?
Obviously you're scum for letting him get your wife and baby, and for not knowing enough effective martial arts to be able to disarm him from the front seat.
ImTheMacheteGuy posted... DragonsDance posted... ImTheMacheteGuy posted... s***... I just marked you because I didn't read the topic fully. I thought you said "If you are drunk, you're scum" and I am drunk, so I was pissed, but I did not read the topic right.
On the other hand, I completely disagree. People use the term "drunk" too loosely in regard to driving and often times society will villify a driver who had been drinking (but was not above the legal limit) as a "drunk driver" if an accident occurred and he/she was involved even it not at fault. It's not a good thing to do, but people who see it as absolute, well-definted black and white piss me off. I've been in the car with drunk drivers well over hundreds of times in the past 10 years and the reason no accidents have ever occurred goes beyond luck. Not advocating drunk driving, but "just saying"
If you've been bleeepldy drinking and you're driving blerp dee gobble, you're a terrible gooble derpity person. It may or may not be geeble gop legal, but that doesn't make leeeebledorp it any glob better.
It's very well defined and black and white.
you don't know me well enough to have an opinion... ESPECIALLY if your ass is f***ing joyrock... ESPECIALLY.
No, I do.
If you've been drinking(that is, more than one drink) and you go for a drive, you're awful.
End of story.
I don't have to know ANYTHING personal about you to know this.
Dark Young Link posted... Drunk Mario Kart is awesome.
But yeah, drunk driving in real life is terrible and the people who insist they're an exception to the rule ought to be put away.
I'm talking about actual drunkenness, not "I had one beer".
Personally I don't even do it after one beer, but I'm paranoid about that. I'm talking about the same thing though, people that actually drink seriously then drive.
Although I'm still going to say he's scum because he does, in fact, probably pick Toad, based on my keen observations of absolutely nothing.
ImTheMacheteGuy posted... s***... I just marked you because I didn't read the topic fully. I thought you said "If you are drunk, you're scum" and I am drunk, so I was pissed, but I did not read the topic right.
On the other hand, I completely disagree. People use the term "drunk" too loosely in regard to driving and often times society will villify a driver who had been drinking (but was not above the legal limit) as a "drunk driver" if an accident occurred and he/she was involved even it not at fault. It's not a good thing to do, but people who see it as absolute, well-definted black and white piss me off. I've been in the car with drunk drivers well over hundreds of times in the past 10 years and the reason no accidents have ever occurred goes beyond luck. Not advocating drunk driving, but "just saying"
If you've been drinking and you're driving, you're a terrible person. It may or may not be legal, but that doesn't make it any better.
The Mana Sword posted... so that was neon's plan all along
well played
To get an account I don't care about warned?
I've been banned before, I could really care less. I've been axed before, could care less. The mod staff and TOS are both godawful and far from respectable.
Inviso posted... I can agree with that entire post. 4 is a godawful abomination in terms of the utter lack of character development of ANYONE prior to their deaths. And the opening scene can really only be rivaled by FD2's highway crash.
I give 5 the nod for the opening because 2's was more of "this is what happens, and it's really really cool", while 5 actually expanded it and gave the scene a good deal of suspense
Holy mother of god HOW THE HELL DID KINETIC KING GET THROUGH.
Seriously, this is the biggest failure in voting in show history, even worse than professor splash, even worse than Fiddleheads being knocked out TWICE.
XxDarkCrueltyxX posted... SOAD had a somewhat original first album, after that it was repetitive and nu metalish. I never understood their popularity in the same way I never understood why Korn or Godsmack were popular.
In other words you don't like the genre so aren't fit to judge them.
Mer_Mer_Yes_Mer posted... From: the icon ownz all | #033 spice girls were gaga on her first album: one good song, maybe two, but a lot of crap. what is this blasphemy
Spice and Spice World were two of the best pop albums of the 90s tbqh
the icon ownz all posted... From: DragonsDance | #016 By the way Icon, you posted a rock band I'd never heard of in an introduction topic awhile ago, but I can't remember what it was :( I talk about a lot of music, have to be more specific!
I can't remember! Just that it was very melodic, and I believe it was their second album, and because a lot of people hadn't heard of the band you decided to make a post to introduce us :3
the icon ownz all posted... Queens of the Stone Age? PJ Harvey? The Walkmen? Godspeed You! Black Emperor? Rome? There's plenty of music out there if you look.
By the way Icon, you posted a rock band I'd never heard of in an introduction topic awhile ago, but I can't remember what it was :(
Not sure if you'd know what I was talking about now, but hopefully so, it was amazing :D
XxDarkCrueltyxX posted... well, rock n roll has certainly declined. I havent heard anything from this era that equals Smashing Pumpkins, Alice in Chains, Pavement, Sublime, ect.