Lurker > omniryu

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Because there's some truth to it. Look at how aggressive you guys are! You think that if we met in real life you wouldn't try to attack someone who opposes your view?

Wasn't there someone in the last thread that said Donald Trump should be hang and you guys cosigned it? Imagine what you would do to someone who you think is his followers.

Umbreon posted...

You're the only user here that brought up that violent scenario. No one here has expressed any desire to physically harm you. It's nonsensical to invent a scenario where you are fighting anyone, much less three users here.

You think we're savages? Over disagreeing with you?

I have seen a lot of people fight over politics. I had one guy tried to fight one of my coworker for voting for Trump. The rest of us laugh because we said he was the only black guy who voted for Trump

KitKats posted...

Weve reached the part where this guy is comparing himself to Bruce Lee

So let's break down what you said.

This is willfully misinterpreting someone's post. You know what I said is that there a difference in saying you can take all three on and there is a difference in saying you don't dropped down and curl up and let three people attack you.

Just be honest and tell everyone you want me to look like a bad guy. Being binary in these case is easy.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

It isn't fanfiction the point of it is, if you're highly invested into politics nowadays you're likely going to have an intense confrontation with someone who opposes your view.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

I pay attention to the dialogue.

Just like how console war use certain tactics so does the ones are into political discourse.

Just like how you're trying to derail our conversation into me looking like a mad man when I call out the intensity of political discourse and how things works nowadays. I think you know I am right but you're trying to double down as me being "center" or what you really want to say is a Trump supporter.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

If you interpret that as beating people up then that says a lot about you.

There is a difference between I am Bruce Lee vs I am going to duck and let everyone hit me.

bobbycorwin posted...

Of course. Pretty much by design since Republicans own their own media. Their followers will never be convinced that Trump did anything wrong, and most wont even know what he was charged for.

Ttump was right when he said he could shoot someone in 5th avenue and not lose a single vote.

And they the people here said they don't care. What more can we say?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Are you a chef if you cook? I hardly voted in the last 3 elections.

1. First was for Obama
2. I skip the second
3. Then I voted for Hilary
4. And I skipped everyone after

I don't have a strong stance on certain issues. I don't know what every details about what law is implemented and where the budgets go. I voted for Obama because he is black. I voted for Hilary because my mom asked me to do it.

Do I think Trump colluded with Russia, sure, probably for business. Do I think Biden is a pedo. Do I think Biden son should have been investigated? No because it is politically motivated.

If I can rank myself, I would be a Pokmon trainer who stuck at the first gym.

HashtagSEP posted...

What isnt authentic about it? Do you think Trump is innocent?

I think if it was anyone else, their wouldn't even have been a push for it. That's democrat or republican. Do I think he is guilty? Of course! If you have witness testimony and paper work. Which is there.

bobbycorwin posted...

Democrats do call out other democrats. The left actually eggs made fun of by the right for eating their own simply for daring to hold their own accountable. You dont hear about it much because there is no controversy. Nancy Pelosi commits insider trading and both sides are upset. Nothing really to drive engament there.

On the other hand, Trump being convicted of felony charges and his cult of followers defending him does drive engagement.

Pretty much, that's gonna be there push for their election campaign. Like i said while he is guilty, they will see it as the democrats burned him at the stakes. It will just push them more to strike fear into their audience.

And if you're this open:
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/f135e8c1.jpg
It makes them easier to convince others that it isn't authentic and it is about low blows.

Look, I agree you guys say he should but the way how you're being perceived is different. I know you guys don't care and that's fine. I am not going to argue for you to care.

Cemith posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/b/b0619f01.jpg

Why can't someone not be apolitical? To be honest, you're making it sounds like a cult.

Umbreon posted...

"I bet you these users would fight be IRL, but I'd win!" sounds like something that would be posted in 2005 and be laughed at.

I don't fight, if no one starts none but I am saying a lot of people who too much invested in politics starts to get violent.

KitKats posted...

LMAO what is this fantasy fanfic about you winning a 3v1 fight?

You are hilarious.

yeah. Funny, but you don't let anyone touch you without fighting back doesn't matter if it 3v1.

KitKats posted...

This is just you saying the trial is a witch hunt and its a coincidence Trump is guilty.

I didn't say he wasn't guilty. And why should I continue if you guys don't even care to hear what the other side see it as?

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

So say that you didn't bother to feel like reading it because it is true. Also, dude is a gender neutral term.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/d/dbd874a1.jpg

MC_BatCommander posted...

Pro tip if you're trying to win an argument, randomly name dropping Nancy Pelosi doesn't help. No one here has argued that any politician should be able to enrich themselves with insider trading.

This is the most embarrassing "BoTh SiDeS" shit I've seen so far

But why act as if only one side tell lies, put on a front, etc.

Everyone see the fault and criticism on both sides but no one wants to call out their own side.
hockeybabe89 posted...

But it is a genuine trial because Trump has genuinely been committing felonies on the regular since long before he got into politics. He is genuinely facing a lot of legal trouble and he genuinely got convicted yesterday of crimes he genuinely committed.

But "we guys" said Trump needs to be kept out of office, so that means... what? He got away with his crimes this long, so now everyone needs to wait until he is politically irrelevant before addressing the crimes? Because even though the trials are completely legitimate, you don't like why people care about them?

Did you also think that maybe if Trump wasn't a career con man, rapist and traitor, that maybe he wouldn't be so hated? Perhaps his routinely evil and literally illegal actions are what make him such an enemy. Maybe the fact that he is major political figure instead of a random garbage man brings more spotlight to his transgressions, brings him more heat.

I am saying by all means investigate him. I am not saying he shouldn't be. I am still trying to figure out why he still wants to run.

But why get mad if I see the larger picture? Why can't it be, "The republican are going to retlaiate, what do we do next?" Instead of "shut up omni!!!"

hockeybabe89 posted...

Should we also put a hold on all rape and murder trials until we take down every poltician and celebrity who may have done the same?

No go for it, but be authentic dude.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/f/f135e8c1.jpg

EPR-radar, shockthemonkey, and Umbreon says they don't care. I just say that's what the republican sees it as. They say who care. What should I say?

Maybe I should explain myself. Because no one see it where I come from.

I think ever since Obama and social media past. We have taken politics into a new height of intensity. The republican started it first by calling Obama and his wife a monkey and all that racist shit. Obama at a dinner roasted Trump (which I think motivated him to run for president).

Then social media comes out and we have ideologies spread out like never before. Since everyone is on the phone. We see the news 24/7 we are in constant discussion. Then we see this political discourse and it feeds us and intensify the feelings we have. This is for both democrats and Republicans. 18 Years ago, there wouldn't be this much contempt for each other. I think right now those three I mention would try to attack me in person. I would fight back because I am not gonna let no one hit me and get away with it.

While I find it a little amazing we have our first criminal president. Doesn't mean I am going to call out it wasn't coming from authentic place and that the republican won't retaliate.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

And you're convince anyone who don't call your shit out that they love Trump.

HighSeraph posted...

Sounds like a fetish thing

It is a retaliation against women moving in the ladder in life.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

My guy it is fucking facts. You're trying to put words in my mouth that I want Trump to be free. But I call shut out. Then be fair and say Nancy Pelosi needs to be investigated for insider day trading or benefitting from laws that influence stocks.

No one cares because it isn't trump.

hockeybabe89 posted...

Either way, who cares what they perceive? That doesn't factor in to whether or not committing felonies should get someone convicted

Fine, I just wanted to state my observation.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

And that shit is true! You see the quote yourself! Let it be because he is a felon! Not because he is president. Do you see how dumb it is you're revealing the intent of not being sincere? You think I am gonna hide from shit? Just like how they need to be called out, so do you guys. Be fucking for real.

I never said that he didn't deserve this, I never said Biden is a criminal. I never said that his base is justified in doing what they do.

My goodness, this is such a fucking cycle of tit for tat. Can't you guys see? How did you not see this thread was coming?

Umbreon posted...

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/80779692/980633653

Your attempts to derail topic is proof that you're not here for a serious discussion. You already knew this though.

It isn't serious because you don't agree that I call that shit out.

hockeybabe89 posted...

You're right, bud. If someone commits a bunch of felonies, the court should consider how mad the convict's fans will be at the sentence.

Here is the thing, I never said that he shouldn't be convicted.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

And you lack reading comprehension. I told you they perceive it as a witch hunt. You guys just wanted to attack folks for not saying the exact Trump is a felon.

Some fat slobby slob. Seriously, this is why I say this shit is being taken too far. Sometimes when they say men don't like women these days. I am like, "nah, that's crazy." Then I get proven wrong. What these guys do is take feminism the wrong way or take what one reporter says out of context. Get mad a start posting videos of women getting humiliated online.

I think if we see this shit we need to start hitting folks themselves.

Whatever happen the days where they just brush off that stuff and look down on men fighting women? Look at the comment section, smh.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C7klLcRuLzt/?igsh=bHp0Y3oxbGlmdjJ1

Umbreon posted...

You don't get your way by making terrorist threats. These people will discover that the hard way.

You too! I called this shit out and what the fuck you do? Attack me!

@DrizztLink

You got made and accused of me republican because I called out what they were going to do

cabcalloway1983 posted...

No way Trump loses in November.

Are you sure?

We should have been using EV.... such a damn shame that we let greed get in the way.

thronedfire2 posted...

this definitely happened

Why is it so hard to believe?

EPR-radar posted...

IMO it's double edged.

The supreme court would clearly be much better.

But the rot in the GOP blatantly exposed by Trumpism would have remained somewhat hidden, which could have created issues later on.

They came out when Obama was in office and GOP started saying all those racist shit.

DrizztLink posted...

What the actual fuck.

And that's all you have to say, "fuck".

Just say you want to attack anyone who you think disagree with you.

DrizztLink posted...

Not really, this isn't an argument so much as a roast session.

Because you're a weirdo.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/c/c19a77fc.jpg
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/e/e4466e93.jpghttps://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/5/5572ca97.jpg

Is this what a republican post? A republican thats says " there will be a back lash but wants brie Larson as samus aran." What kind of shit is that?

Then you don't even bother to even ask what do I think. Did you ever ask do I think Biden is a criminal or a pedo? No! You don't (btw, I don't that's just accusations).

You know what the behavior you're doing called? It is like both side have a split personality. " either you're with me or against me."

This is why I say you guys are weird. You try to fit everyone in a binary and you're ready to attack without further evidence. Stop acting like a loser and chill out.

DrizztLink posted...

Your opinion is meaningless.

You're *

And again you're getting too hyped up and looking for an argument.

DrizztLink posted...

Another completely horseshit analogy.

0/2, we're revoking your creative writing privileges.

You're acting weird dude.

EPR-radar posted...

Haha. The guy that just had to get "witch hunt" in there ASAP regarding the Trump verdict is pretending to be some outsider. LOL.

And for the record, I would be overjoyed to never have to care about politics again for as long as I live. It's an exhausting chore.

I am not saying it is a witch hunt, but I hear that's whay they say. So if just speak on what they say and what they do, I am a republican? Make it make sense.

bfslick50 posted...

Why do you care so much bout politics certainly isnt a statement from outside that mold

Because you guys are acting weird.

DrizztLink posted...

Just gonna slide on by the rest of the replies, are ya?

Because you guys made up your mind.

You know what you guys remind me of?

Those super homophobic guys who call anyone gay for saying something that isn't a 100% straight. Not saying you are homophobic.

EPR-radar posted...

LOL

Of course you are taking a side. This is the "Republican shitbirds (that I secretly admire for being shitbirds) will inevitably win by being shitbirds, so stop being so mean about Republicans being shitbirds" song.

I know the next 20 verses or so of this by heart, but it would be really tedious to type it all out. That's your job, if you last that long.

Again, you're too vested into this gig and you're trying to fit someone who doesn't fit into a mold that doesn't fit.

Heineken14 posted...

Do the same... what? They've been trying to impeach Biden for like a year now and they haven't got anything to arrest Hunter on.

Turns out, the right wing lie of being able to just SAY something and have it be true isn't actually a thing.

Again, I haven't kept in touch.

EPR-radar posted...

These people always give themselves away so quickly. There are very very few that even need tags.

I think you're too vested into politics dude. Which is why I particularly veer away from this stuff. If you look back into anything I posted on gamefaqs. One thing I bring up is that so many people are so caught up into polticis that it bleeds out to other area.

For instance we push inclusion and diversity. Great! I have family members who wanted to go for acting great. On the other end I see people make up shit about diversity and push a narrative because of politics and they get so vested. I almost got mad about that shit too.

Some guy name Mike Zeroh on YouTube keep makingshit up with NO fucking evidence!! I had to step away because i was getting too vested.

Umbreon posted...

More votes.

Because cultists couldn't accept defeat.

Not punishing Trump for crimes he committed would do far more damage than worrying about any political 'backlash' from people who already decided they were going to vote for Trump again in 2017.

"It would be better if you let criminals get away with everything" is an argument that only suits criminals.

I never said he should get away with anything. I am telling you what will happen.

If you keep poking an angry dog. You will get bitten. It is stating the obvious. Anyway, you think I am taking a side. Look at in topic I made on here. It was never about Trump.
I made topics about:

1. My ex cheating
2. My ex gaslighting
3. My roommates cat that I hate
4. Update on the cat I hate
5. My friend taking his friends ex
6. Child support.
7. Women's safety while men should go to therapy in the meanwhile.
8. Did i mention the cat I hate?

Btw, I hate the cat less now. I am piss that my roommate just doesn't care.

EPR-radar posted...

You're in for a rough time here with all this feelings and impressions shit. That's what Trump and the Republicans trade in to get their awful policies enacted.

Who cares what the fucking deplorables say or do? The only thing that matters is outnumbering them at the polls.

Honestly, right now all I am concerned with is if megaman legend remaster will be a thing...
It is half way though the year and it isn't.... .

So here's what I think, I think the Republicans will do the same. Sometimes when you mean well (democrats) others can exploit the system they make.

Tyranthraxus posted...

Witches were innocent.

I have a book on witch craft I haven't read.

Ivany2008 posted...

Because people are stupid, and they like the opposite of what they currently have. You could have the best person running the country, and at least half of them will want someone different.

We are closely related to lemmings.

EPR-radar posted...

Of course we're tired of all this Trump shit.

That doesn't change the fact that it's essential to keep him (and as many Republicans as possible) out of office.

@drizztlink

So messages like this illustrated their point that it was never about justice and it was a witch hunt.

DrizztLink posted...

Why?

Because it all about how they paint a picture.

One people sees him as a felon, which he is guilty of doing. The others will see it as a crucifixion as what's his name says, it was only to get him out of office.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

I am just saying he has an audience and what they will do isn't going to stop.

EPR-radar posted...

Of course we're tired of all this Trump shit.

That doesn't change the fact that it's essential to keep him (and as many Republicans as possible) out of office.

That's the thing I am talking about. Also, I might not communicating this the best. What I mean by hyrda is that Trump is just one head. If you cut the metaphorical (not gonna get on trouble if I add metaphorical on) three more head will appear. The politicians are the head and the audience is the body and the only thing I see is that this whole dance we have been doing for what? Almost ten years or however ( I haven't kept touch for awhile) will just get uglier.

Umbreon posted...

His audience is irrelevant. God Himself could come down and say "This Trump person is a pretty unsavory person" and trumpers would find some reason to disregard that.

It's the people in the center that are paying attention to this.

But why did he became president in the first place? Why did they storm the capitol? Idk, I just hope this isn't a hydra situation.

EPR-radar posted...

Defeatism at times like this make you look like a Republican.

Never voted republican always democrat, if i did vote. To be honest, I don't care about democrat or republican anymore, but I am more curious about this is anyone tired of the same rodeo. I have been hearing about Trump since Obama roasted him to become president.

Umbreon posted...

So why would Trump and Repubs try to fight this for months?

Umbreon posted...

So why would Trump and Repubs try to fight this for months?

Ok, I don't know why I double quote you but I will say this, I don't have a foot in this race.

I am just looking at the bigger picture. Of course Trump and the Republicans will fight this case. I am just saying that his audience, his demographic will see this as a the democrats crucified him. How they see it is, they are going after Trump particularly because he has power to sway a crowd.

CADE_FOSTER posted...

house arrest no social media no rallies nothing just goes away

That's not how it works. They making Trump look like a martyr.

KaZooo posted...

I mean literally Chad

I guess. He did say he is about to get some from another lady soon.

Ok, so to make things easier I will use nicknames.

TLDR:

• Chad - my friend
• Nathan - Nathan's Chad friend he met on Fortnite and Amanda's ex-boyfriend.
• Amanda - Nathan's ex-girlfriend. Don't want her ex back. Interested in Chad and one other friend in the group (he's irrelevant for now).

Here is the short version:

1. Chad and Nathan are friends
2. Nathan and Amanda are ex-boyfriend and girlfriend.
3. Amanda started playing Fortnite with Chad and Nathan.
4. After awhile Chad starts playing with Amanda instead Nathan.
5. Chad and Amanda confessed their feelings for each other.
6. If Chad and Nathan are friends, is it okay to go after his ex-GF.
7. Is that a betrayal to Nathan as a friend?

Long confusing version in spoilers.

Chad, mid-30s, and in a situation-ship. He met Nathan on Fortnite. The guy is in his early 20s and lives with his Ex-girlfriend, Amanda, and her family. Amanda is around the same age as Nathan. Well, Chad and Nathan friend bonded for a couple of months even with songs that touched their heart. So they would play with a couple of other friends and his Amanda would jump in. The last several weeks from today is where things become interesting.

So over the last few weeks, Chad started to play exclusively with his Amanda. I noticed it and just had only speculations in my head. Chad soon confessed to me that had some type of interest in Amanda. The friend notices it too and starts to become jealous. Amanda confessed she has feelings for Chad (and vice versa) and another one of their Fortnite friends.

The question I ask I want to know is if my friend is in the wrong for liking this girl even though she is single. She stated that she doesn't want her Nathan back. If Chad was in the same position, I know he would be mad.

There are things I think that should be clear.

Amanda can and should date anyone she wants.
I think Nathan needs to move out and move on with his life.
While Amanda doesn't belong to Nathan, I think it is messy for Chad to do that to a friend.

Am I in the wrong here? I mean they live in different states so I don't think it is that big of a deal. It just seems my friend isn't someone you should trust in that situation.

LonelyStoner posted...

Did you make this as unnecessarily confusing on purpose?

Who am I kidding.

Oddly enough, I was hoping I would make it easier instead of saying "he, she, and he"