Lurker > Thud

Their victims don't get a choice. Just because they were lucky doesn't excuse their stupid decision. Throw the book at them the moment they get caught. Ruin their life before they ruin someone else's, don't wait until after.

I'm done with this. It's not a debate. Everyone knows drinking and driving is fucking stupid, and defending it in any way is disgusting. Tagged and moving on.

It is enough to affect their reaction times and decision making. You don't trust the person to make that call because by definition they're not thinking clearly. "Let the drunk guy decide how drunk he is" is one of the stupidest suggestions you could make.

Don't drink and drive. It doesn't get any simpler than that. If you drink, you don't drive. If you do, you deserve to get arrested. Period.

Found the guy with multiple DUIs.

Stop defending drunk driving and get a reality check ASAP.

Don't feed the trolls, guys. They're wrong, anyway.

I just hope they realize how stupid drunk driving is and stop trying to justify and defend it before they put someone in the hospital.

Good. One drink still affects your reflexes and reasoning.

Don't drink if you're going to be driving. This isn't a complicated concept.

I'd like to hear a reason why they shouldn't be.

Remind me again why these seditious, fascist freaks are allowed to run free and foment civil war after their terrorist attack on January 6th? Or why we didn't hang their traitorous ancestors after they lost the civil war that they started because they hated the POTUS and didn't want to give up owning human beings as livestock?

I just noticed this gem.

Wtf kind of attitude is this? How old are you?

One shall not lie with another man as he would a woman

My take. It's ok to lie to women but not other men

You're just making shit up now to try to justify using a simple phrase completely wrong.

She was literally arrested and immediately fired lol

What consequence is she not facing that a non-cop would?

No shit. I'm saying in HER mind and via her actions it was "rules for thee". Cops thinking they can do wtfever they want even though they know it's wrong. I'm glad it got arrested and hope it does time and it's life is ruined like they ruin other people's lives

Except she's been arrested for shoplifting. The rules are literally being applied to her too.

Oh. Or was that you flaunting that basic gun safety is useless in response to somebody saying they could get to their secured firearm in seconds by using a stacked hyperbolic what if against them?

How does "rules for thee" apply in a topic where we're specifically talking about a cop being arrested for shoplifting while in uniform?

Who is the person who secures their gun putting in danger that made you feel the need to attack the very notion of securing a firearm?

OK soldier

Like, for the record: this is the post that made you feel the need to craft an absurd what if so as to feel superior to somebody securing their firearms. Your own scenario also increases the chance that that would be assailant is also pointing your gun at you but you oddly decided to ignore that point. Which guess what, an unsecured gun increases the chance of that gun being used by a home invader too.

And yet, when it comes to you you argue for every possible advantage for yourself.

And yet your "seconds is all it takes" is very much in offense over the idea that basic securing is such a massive disadvantage that you felt the need to give an unsecured firearms every advantage in response to somebody saying it takes only seconds for him to access it. And had to put them in hyperbolic levels of disadvantage.

So, is it your scenario or everybody else's you want to argue for? Because you've already tried to argue against secured firearms without knowing another person's situation.

And your situation matters very little when you try to argue in support of leaving a firearm unsecured against others by trying to paint a scenario where their unsecured firearm is still inaccessible.

Yes dear, we know. You'll totally grab your gun with one pointed at you so there is never any need to actually follow basic gun safety and secure it.

I wasnt talking about TC

Bingo.

But easier access will totally help him in that strange scenario and totally worth a child killing themselves with his unsecured gun.

If hes already standing over you with a gun drawn then an unsecured gun is as equally unhelpful as a locked one. In fact in that scenario hes likely holding your gun against you.

tc only cares about things to the extent that it effects him and his immediate family

definition of fuck you, got mine

you arent getting thru to him

More shootings are a result of people shooting a family member than a stranger breaking into the home.

Fair next. For people saying its hard to reach a secured weapon I have a beretta locked in a case under the bed that takes me literal seconds to reach and open

Thats just an excuse of shitty gun owners

This guy's never been in a relationship

a what