Lurker > GeraldDarko

Where are you putting this data it is to consume?

You are saying random people are the ones loading up the model with training data?

Think about what you guys are using to excuse MS for a moment. Maybe it will hit you.

Like A.I. gets lots of things right. You act like that shouls be impossible.

What do you mean by load it up?

Do you think A.I. can't figure out who is the owner of Tesla?

It would be a "double-edged sword" to simply hard-code AI to not lie?

dude is an expert who seems to have dedicated his life to this species so I'd say he know what hes doing

Soon enough. Stay strong, friend.

No u

Do reactionaries not complain about pronouns constantly? Constantly, as in every single minute of every single day? Because from what I can tell they never shut up about it.

TC knew what he was doing.

Who is that?

Who?

The hunger never hit me when I did it.

One thing I will say, either frequent showers, or invest in flushable wipes, because plain TP is gonna get Raw after the first 3-4 times

Enjoy that sweet sweet Propofol nap.

People in the other topic were gaslighting everything saying everyone calls it a plain pizza. I have never heard anyone call cheese pizza a plain pizza before.

no its definitely nuts

this is my cousin

no its crazy

I mean, it makes sense to most people I dont really see an issue with it

It's not cheddar i don't think.

Shit's delicious and one of the few things about Papa John's worth a shit imo.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QsjdjUJAkA

Papa Johns has a 5 cheese pizza that's fucking delicious.

Google was placing output from their large language model at the top of results for their search engine.

Is that concept good? Like, when you Google something, or ask something of your computer, do you want it to guess? Is that something other users want, or expect from the Google search bar?

Was there something wrong with the previous status quo of searching, say, "2020 election results," and getting the Wikipedia article as the top result?

You: Talking out of your ass with nothing to back it up.

Me: At least provides something, even if you disagree with it.

Cool, glad we're on the same page.

Feels over reals.

Anyways, there are objectively many lonely women who also fall for romance scams.

And that Reddit thread you were so quick to disregard did have a cited source:

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-47176539

Victims of romance scams - the majority of whom are women - lost an average of 11,145 each last year, according to new figures.

The data, from police reporting centre Action Fraud, showed that 50m was lost in these scams in 2018 when fraudsters pretend to be romantically attached.
Fraudsters trick victims into sending money or gather enough personal information to steal their identities.

These scams of the heart are being highlighted ahead of Valentine's Day.
Police say that victims are targeted via online dating websites, apps, or through social media. Fraudsters use fake profiles to form a relationship with them.

In 2018, 4,555 reports of romance fraud were made to Action Fraud. Total losses were up by 27% compared with the previous year. The total is likely to be higher as many victims are thought to have suffered in secret.

The average age of a romance fraud victim is 50 and 63% of victims are women. They lose twice as much on average as males, Action Fraud said.

I never said men aren't victims of romance scams or anything, I was just trying to point out that your attitude discounts the women who are victims, similarly to how only focusing on female victims of domestic abuse often leaves male victims of domestic abuse out of the conversation.

I just wanted you to be better informed and you decided to double down on asinine feelings.

As things stand, the people telling it what to say are reddit comments and satire sites. If your internet-scouring device does not have a filter it is not a useful device.

Ok, post your evidence that it's primarily straight cis gendered men falling for it.

Haven't seen you post shit other than your preconceived notion.

At least I've given you something of substance. You've offered nothing.

Yes they could program it to say Biden won.

They don't want to.

Women also fall for them quite a bit.

In fact, looking it up to find an article, there's one from The Guardian whose title asserts that the common thought is it's "lonely middle-aged women" who are known for falling for them.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/jan/09/romance-fraud-scam-common-perfect-victim-money

And further down in the Google search there's a Reddit thread title asking why women are more likely to be the victims of romance scams.

Just had my first colonoscopy this morning, started prepping two nights ago with the dulcolax. If you're anything like me the first cleaning out is the worst, and by the time you get to the miralax phase it'll be pure liquid, and just an annoyance rather than painful.

And be as gentle as possible with your wiping, because you're gonna be doing it a lot.

i know people online complain about this a lot but i have literally never run into this, and ive matched/chatted with a lot of people, particularly recently

maybe its specifically a thing that affects cishet guys? are u that, tc? if so my bad, it would make sense that it doesnt come up as much in the type of ppl i match with

The least actively malicious explanation imo

they know their models are ingesting conspiracy theories and shitposts uncritically and so instead of giving wrong information about elections (the way it tells people to eat glue) they just disable those questions

of course, what they really should have done is not released the product at all

Botanists say there is no such thing as a vegetable. It's only a culinary term.

Do you think it is hard to answer: Who won the 2020 USA election?

This is basic info