Lurker > KitKats

No I said

I wasn't wrong and I won't be just because you repeat it a lot. You made the claim that I misused the term based on you not even knowing what I referred to as gaslighting since you said they "never said he had started the conversation", despite that being literally what I quoted them doing.

You don't need me to post sources because I never disagreed with the definition you provided. I have explained exactly what I referred to as gaslighting:

Starting to insult someone and spinning it as them been the ones to start it for replying to it and insult them further because of it.

There was nothing wrong about how the term was being applied, and there won't be by you reposting the definition which I never contradicted many times.

Oh I know you keep pointing out that people use it as trendy buzzword. What I don't know is in which way you think that supports your claim that I used it incorrectly.

"KitKat", what you're highlighting says the term is "more often" used for patterns of behavior. So? What about that means that

is not them "manipulating someone into questioning their perception of reality"?

Well you can keep posting that and I'm still waiting for the explanation about how..

..is not them "manipulating someone into questioning their perception of reality".

As confused and unhinged as saying "they never said he started the conversation" despite that being exactly what I quoted them doing.

are your only active posts in this one topic

Lmao yeah you did. Thanks for unblocking me though

You just typing random words there. You didn't point me in any direction. You just spewed I misued the term and then have continued repeating it nonsensically in a state of denial and your own failure at reading what I even quoted

"I'm speaking out bc .." - said KitKat, who just apparately blocked me as I finished typing this up lol

You just took that as your chance to bully him further.

At this point you're trolling. I didn't misuse anything. Everything I described is what the term means.

It is.

Starting to insult someone and then have the audacity to lie and say them replying to that is THEM "starting the conversation" and insult them even more because of that, is gaslighting at its finest.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/1/1fad53e6.jpg

dont know how else to tell ya

Follow the line of conversation. This specific bit was about attendance.

I didn't distort anything so more like, learn what the term means.

I'm neither lol

No, lying that HE started the conversation, which is replying to a topic and comment others made about him, is gaslighting

This shit

That's cringeworthy gaslighting. Yall made the topic about the him and that particular comment too. He replied to it. He didn't start the conversation in any shape or form

The thing is I like KitsKats as well and (I think) we get along

Thanks bsp. I'm not even going to address KitKats because I was neither suspended nor did I close my account for that reason. Just outright lies.

Whose shitty alt is Miquella?

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/forum/4/44a82484.jpg

When did he become a pariah on CE? I have no real issue with him aside from finding him more than a little ccentric but that can be applied to a lot of people here

Thanks for giving him attention?

Anyone who thinks that what we saw in Episode 3 is 100% the truth of how everything went down needs to chill.

This was Osha's perspective. It's what she knows and what she saw about the incident.

The idea that the coven would just be collapsed and all dead like seems laughable for a reason: it's not how everything went down. The Jedi are hiding information from us.

Everyone keeps saying Nightsisters but unless I was missing something, the show never said that. They could be a different force cult. I'd even wager it as they don't seem to have any of the Nightsisters trappings.

We all know why.

Because I live within TX and have voted blue since 2012.

While true nobody should claim to 100% know the future, a mistake I probably made myself here, currently as is, the idea that a fascist takeover, or maybe even the promise of such, is what turns TX into an alliance with CA is one of the least believable things I've heard of.

The average central/East Texan I've met spends an exorbitant amount of time hating on CXA for merely existing.

The average TX voter that I've met would absolutely side with a Republican fascist over a non-fascist if they were somehow associated with a blue state. Shit, I had someone I knew far more progressive than me become a legit Trumper because they couldn't get over Clinton's "if you or I did what she did we'd be in jail". Dude even legit defended the Klinton Killer Konspiracy.

And once again, TX as a state would never do that. 100% they'd side with him, even if there was anti-TX pockets of violent from non-fascist supporters within the state. Unless the state's government itself was overthrown, TX is siding with the fascist and CA is not.

How about this, then. Can you elaborate? Especially on the super racist part. Im not seeing or understanding your point of view or how its even remotely racist.

Honestly would make at least more sense to have a path carved to each other and not like heres two states and everyone else has the rest of the country

Yeah, to me it seems like they were too scared to actually try something with this movie. Like they were intentionally trying to make this not political, dancing around something that's reflective of current tensions. Why even bother at that point.

I think it was purposely done so that going into the movie, people couldn't pick a team and turn it into some sort of rallying call.

The why and how of the war wasn't really the point of the movie so by leaving it somewhat vague it keeps the focus on the main themes.

This wasn't a MAGA universe though.

It makes sense that two of the largest states would unite against a monarchy. They also didn't just consist of 2 states, iirc it was basically all the west coast states then southern blue states through to Texas, then Oklahoma and north and west to Idaho that stayed with the President, then there was the Florida contingent that was doing its own thing.

Basically there were 3 fractured sections of the US. Texas and California were the heads of the resistance along with Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico among others. Not sure what the Florida faction was even doing honestly.

I don't speak Spanish, which makes it difficult for me to find the discussions on this specifically. I am part of the trans community, it's people who specifically prefer gender neutral identifiers and natively speak Spanish who I've had trouble finding many views from.

I know the terms aren't specifically for nonbinary people, but neither are the English terms like they/them. If nonbinary native Spanish speakers actually did prefer sticking with one of the binary terms I wouldn't argue against them, but the discourse on this topic that I've seen never includes them, which is why I'd really like to hear their perspective.

Nonbinary Latines are the ones who have the most connection to this, and the people railing against gender neutral terms for Latina/Latino usually ignore their existence completely. I've asked this before and no one had it, does anyone have a link to a nonbinary Hispanic person's stance on this? I genuinely want to know what they think, letting cis people decide if a gender-neutral term is needed and phrasing it as an ethnicity issue to silence trans people is clearly a transphobic tactic.

your opposition to Latine is the pearl clutching here. All signs point to it eventually winning out. It's more popular, Spanish speaking people came up with it,

I'm talking about Latine, and an article was already posted showing it is much more popular than Latinx among Spanish speakers:
https://www.axios.com/2024/04/11/latino-latinx-latine-hispanic-term-explainer

Honestly it feels like your opposition to Latine is the pearl clutching here. All signs point to it eventually winning out. It's more popular, Spanish speaking people came up with it, started gaining acceptance in Western academia, etc. I have no idea why you are acting like you either need to embrace Latinx or you're a transphobe. That's a divisive binary that doesn't help the LGBT or Spanish speaking community.

My whole post could be summed up by Ive learned to keep my mouth shut