| Board List | |
|---|---|
| Topic | Trump voter upset the border wall will put her house on Mexico side |
| The Great Muta 22 04/04/17 11:24:44 AM #1 | http://www.rawstory.com/2017/04/if-i-have-to-get-a-lawyer-i-will-trump-voter-upset-his-border-wall-will-put-her-house-on-mexico-side/ Trump supporters in Texas are coming to the realization that their vote for the president may force some of them out of their homes for less than they are worth, with others finding out that — if they stay — they’ll be living in Mexico if his wall is built. As part of a CNN special report on the impact the wall between the U.S. and Mexico will have on border dwellers in the state that went overwhelmingly for President Donald Trump, the network found there is already an extensive history of government lawsuits filed to take property from homeowners. With Trump’s wall planned for the entire border, some of his supporters are now saying they will fight his administration in the courts. According to one family who had their farm cut in half — part of it in the U.S., part of it in Mexico — they are still stunned that government was able to take their property 10 years ago. “I was very angry, I just kept saying, how can they do that? How is that possible in the United States that they can do this?” D’Ann Loop of Brownsville recalled. “They put up a fence in front of our land and then keep us in here — lock us in. I didn’t understand. I was very — I was floored and flabbergasted.” According to Loop, all of their property is now on the Mexico side after losing in court. “It left us no property on the U.S. side of the border wall, including my house,” she explained. “Everything was behind — on the Mexican side of the U.S. border fence,” with her husband adding they enter the U.S. through a locked gate “You punch your code in or you come behind the border wall, there is a feeling of isolation,” Ray Loop explained. With hundreds of additional miles of Trump’s proposed wall expected to be built in along the Texas border, thousands of land owners may be be forced to sell their property to the government or stay and live in changed circumstances. According to Pat Bell of River Bend, she voted for Trump but never supported his border wall plan, and now she may have to get a lawyer because her home will no longer be in Texas. Saying fences and walls don’t work, Bell said she’ll fight for stop it. “Absolutely I would go to the people who are in charge and, you hate to say I would get a lawyer, but if it comes to that issue, you would,” she explained. |
| Topic | Black Lives Matter of Philadelphia has BANNED white people from their meetings |
| The Great Muta 22 04/04/17 11:22:01 AM #72 | DifferentialEquation posted... But when white people discriminate no one tries to morally excuse it. Except when you're a business refusing service to people, right? Like perhaps a Christian bakery? Or a gun range refusing Muslims? Come on man, don't be dense. This shit happens ALL the time and people on every side defend it. You're not revealing some big hypocrisy. |
| Topic | Black Lives Matter of Philadelphia has BANNED white people from their meetings |
| The Great Muta 22 04/04/17 11:14:02 AM #66 | DifferentialEquation posted... Where did I ever say that I want to stop BLM from doing this don't? I don't. Let them do it. So you have no problem with discrimination then, only when it's against "your side". That's pathetic. |
| Topic | Black Lives Matter of Philadelphia has BANNED white people from their meetings |
| The Great Muta 22 04/04/17 11:04:46 AM #60 | DifferentialEquation posted... If for whatever reason white people held some sort of meeting for white people only, the people defednig BLM on this would be the first ones to start crying racism. And you don't get to play the card of being upset about this as you've defended places being able to run their business privately and allowed to refuse service to whomever. By trying to make others look like a hypocrite you've revealed how massive of a one you are. Especially if you've ever talked about how "the black community needs to solve their own problems and stop relying on the government". Anyway this is shit and does nothing to help no one. All this contributes to is more anger and dissent among the every day citizen. |
| Topic | Black Lives Matter of Philadelphia has BANNED white people from their meetings |
| The Great Muta 22 04/04/17 9:55:31 AM #33 | The Admiral posted... I thought BLM died after the election now that Democrats no longer need to pretend they give a shit about this group. "BUT BUT LIBBBERALLLLSSS" lmao never change Addy |
| Topic | Washington state man arrested for killing home invader |
| The Great Muta 22 04/03/17 5:13:07 PM #137 | Lorenzo_2003 posted... Meh, laws change over time and they differ from state to state, country to country and so on. The government now has a case against the homeowner, but nobody else will have to worry about that intruder breaking into their home, so there's that. It's on the person to know the laws of their own state at their own time. Ignorance of the law, etc. |
| Topic | Washington state man arrested for killing home invader |
| The Great Muta 22 04/03/17 2:22:45 PM #132 | muchdran posted... Shouldn't have broken into somebodys house And if the homeowner didn't violate the law, he wouldn't be arrested. |
| Topic | Washington state man arrested for killing home invader |
| The Great Muta 22 04/03/17 12:26:30 PM #117 | Just looked up the Murder 2 charge for Washington, which is what the man was charged with, and it states: person is guilty of murder in the second degree when: (a) With intent to cause the death of another person but without premeditation, he or she causes the death of such person or of a third person; And the rest is about committing a felony and a death happens. This is fairly cut and dry tbh |
| Topic | Washington state man arrested for killing home invader |
| The Great Muta 22 04/03/17 12:21:01 PM #113 | Anarchy_Juiblex posted... Obviously we're not certain how it played out entirely but there's nothing wrong with going back in armed and trying to forcibly evict or detain him. Obviously there is being that it's both against the law and the man was arrested |
| Topic | Washington state man arrested for killing home invader |
| The Great Muta 22 04/03/17 12:14:11 PM #102 | HypnoCoosh posted... Ok so if an unborn fetus is no threat to the mother then it should not be aborted? Stop bringing up bullshit that has nothing to do with the topic, please |
| Topic | Washington state man arrested for killing home invader |
| The Great Muta 22 04/03/17 12:13:43 PM #98 | Mystere posted... "Don't shoot the guy! We have people that get paid to do that. Call them." Right....that's how the law works... Like people do realize you have to abide by the laws and regulations of your state, and just because you "feel" that it's bullshit doesn't make any difference in the eyes of the law. And the whole "leaving and going to a primary residence to get a gun and then returning to kill them" makes you the aggressor. If you own multiple properties and you find a homeless man sleeping in one of them, you can tell them to leave. You can call the cops and have them arrested. But you can't straight kill them if they refuse. |
| Topic | Washington state man arrested for killing home invader |
| The Great Muta 22 04/03/17 12:06:35 PM #90 | ROBANN_88 posted... i can't understand why he didn't run away. can anyone explain this to me? I think it's safe to assume anyone doing a B&E to shower isn't mentally sound, no? |
| Topic | Washington state man arrested for killing home invader |
| The Great Muta 22 04/03/17 12:05:02 PM #86 | Anarchy_Juiblex posted... Not having actually attacked him =/= not a threat/dangerous. What is with you making up scenarios and events that didn't happen in order to mash your attempt at logic through? First you said the guy probably lunged at him, with no evidence of such. Then you said you have the right to shoot anyone who breaks into your home, which goes against the law in numerous areas and even those with Castle Doctrine have provisions in it. Now you're hypothesizing about children walking into a secondary home and using the restroom while this guy showers? Like, what? Stick to reality please |
| Topic | Washington state man arrested for killing home invader |
| The Great Muta 22 04/03/17 12:00:37 PM #76 | Anarchy_Juiblex posted... No, it's not sociopathy. It's informed consent, it's the social contract. If you break into someone's fucking home, they get to shoot you. Everyone knows the risk. Fucking deal with it. STOP FUCKING DEFENDING THESE FUCKING DEGENERATES. Society is better off EVERY time one of these people dies. Wrong. Thank god you have no authority in life |
| Topic | Mexico installs 'penis seats' in an attempt to cut down on sexual harassment |
| The Great Muta 22 04/03/17 9:34:00 AM #25 | The Admiral posted... Another dumb liberal campaign that will probably backfire when some homeless guy thinks it means it's okay for him to whip his penis out in the subway. That didn't take long |
| Topic | Social Justice Nazi Puncher Logic XII: Fists of Fuhrery (trigger warning: TTI) |
| The Great Muta 22 04/01/17 5:21:04 PM #76 | Conflict posted... Literally everyone that's criticizing this topic is saying he's weird for collecting tons of pictures of shit he doesn't like. You're not very good at this 'armchair psychologist' thing Besides couldn't thag same logic be flipped on Mal for being so obsessed with this stuff? If he didn't actually believe some of it he simply wouldn't give a shit |
| Topic | Social Justice Nazi Puncher Logic XII: Fists of Fuhrery (trigger warning: TTI) |
| The Great Muta 22 04/01/17 5:18:32 PM #74 | You're a really weird person Mal, and probably should seek some professional help |
| Topic | Man slays pregnant wife with sword to save the world. |
| The Great Muta 22 03/31/17 5:34:07 PM #30 | This is legitimately awful. And the woman was 6 months pregnant with their second child, the first was a 2 year old who was there when this happened. Like good lord |
| Topic | Supreme Court of Canada to hear 'honour killing' extradition case. |
| The Great Muta 22 03/21/17 12:38:01 AM #6 | In court, the Crown alleged the pair orchestrated the murder because Sidhu had married a poor rickshaw driver in India, rather than the wealthy older man they preferred. Four men have already been convicted of murder in India in the case. Sidhu and Badesha appealed the extradition, raising a number of grounds, including that they might be tortured or neglected in Indian jails. In a split ruling in February, The British Columbia Court of Appeal set aside the minister’s order. “In my view, there is a valid basis for concern that the applicants will be subjected to violence, torture and/or neglect if surrendered,” Justice Ian Donald said in his reasons for judgment. The judge concluded that the minister’s decision to accept assurances from India that the health and safety of the accused would be protected was not reasonable. “The minister cannot give effect to his surrender orders by sending the applicants to India until he receives assurances that are meaningful and likely to be effective.” As usual, the high court gave no reasons for agreeing to hear the case. This is like, a really tricky one. Because while what they did is fucking awful and they deserve death, you're also sending them back to India where you know their safety isn't guaranteed and you really can't set that legal precedent. Hmm |
| Topic | This new Dan Schneidershow "game breakers" has |
| The Great Muta 22 03/12/17 1:43:58 PM #226 | |
| Board List |
