Lurker > Juggernaut480

normal and sane video game discussions(whether praise, criticism or predictions) on video game boards?

I've been to many different video game discussion board websites like IGN and there's no other gaming forums that I've been to that is as ridiculously toxic and pathetic like Gamefaqs boards. The Poll of the Day board here is ok with some occasional trolling and flaming but Jesus Christ, the video game boards are just god-awful noxious. They're nothing but a cesspool of trolls, batshit crazy angry fanboys that are extremely overly-defensive of their precious favorite consoles and their console exclusive IPs, and flame wars between your normal, sane and unbiased gamer(who gets sucked into the flame wars), trolls and fanboys. You can't even make valid criticisms of a video game hardware or IP while still praising them(basically trying to be unbiased and fair) without being followed around and flamed/attacked by an angry internet mob of fanboys here.

On top of that, it seems like everyone here all over Gamefaqs love to stalk people's profile just so they can find more ammunition for their pathetically lame attempts of their insults towards people who don't share the same views as them. I've never been to any other forums where users stalk other users' profiles to point out that they're brand new or to make ASSumptions that they're just another alt account of a "troll"(the most over-used word that gets thrown around a lot here), just so they look for some sort of verbal weapon or verbal booby trap to use for their flame bait.

Sure, it's the internet and it's obviously bound to have pissing contests and trolling between keyboard warriors but never have I been to a forum as toxic as this one. It's in the same level as Youtube comments in terms of toxicity.

Lokarin posted...

Neither image is game related

It isn't but the "troll" label gets thrown around a lot in all the gamefaqs gaming discussion board, directing it only at people who share opinions of a video game console or console exclusive IPs that they don't like to hear.

jayj420 posted...

"Trolling" has become the war cry of butthurt assholes on gaming forums around the net who take their opinions way too seriously.

"Trolling" is just a ridiculous offense in the first place, it's like arresting someone because you suspect they might have wanted to get someone upset when there is no way to prove that. If you have a heavy handed attitude with such an offense you are just opening the door for any crazy asshole with an ego to go around trying to punish anyone who disagrees with them simply because they get really emotional at everyone who doesn't agree with them.

Yeah, pretty much.

Pretty much anyone who dares give a single honest criticism of their precious console or the exclusive IPs for their precious console they blindly fanboy for(whether PS4, Xbox One or Nintendo Switch), even if that person never trashed on the console, never trashed on the console brand's exclusive IP or said it was a bad console, get's labeled a "troll" or an alt account of a "troll". Also, let's not single out the Nintendo Switch gamefaqs board for being such a toxic place(since it seems like everyone here all over gamefaqs love to single out the Switch board for some reason) because the PS4 and Xbox One boards are no different.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/33/Stop_trolling.svg/400px-Stop_trolling.svg.png

https://cdn.someecards.com/someecards/usercards/1288293745876_5057058.png

MICHALECOLE posted...

When was the last good sega game?

Last good Sega game on a Sega console or last good Sega game in general(after they gave up on consoles)?

Let's say Sega finally has the confidence to go back into the video game hardware market to make another console, like a Sega Dreamcast 2(but in the same hardware specs class as the PS4 and Xbox One or possibly just a tad above them in specs). Sonic the Hedgehog slowly becomes the great quality and beloved Sega IP again like it once was on this console.

Would you buy it?

Nope. Still the same shit with my life.

scared/intimidated to fire a certain employee?

I was just wondering since I used to work for UPS as a package handler(for a year) and I've had one co-worker who only been working for 1 month and a half(I've had 6 months in working for this job at the time) and had mediocre performances(by UPS standards) for not following safety procedures while not going as fast as humanly possible(which is a near impossible task). UPS has this 3 month probation period they put on new hires before they eventually get Union protection from management. Some of the supervisors and the center manager wanted to fire him but couldn't since they're too intimidated by him and fear for their lives that they'll set him off by firing him and he'll snap at them.

This co-worker of mine is a big Polynesian dude(I think he's Tongan), who stands 6'5 tall and appears to weigh over 270lbs (he's a bit chubby but still very muscular and has the bicep size that's almost bigger than my head) and has a scary reputation of beating the shit out of a group of 3 ex high school football players (who were older and bigger than him) all at once(and had one of them sent to the hospital) in his high school years and one of the supervisors happened to have went to the same high school as him at the same time period by coincidence. That, plus he once flipped out at the supervisors (screamed at them loud enough for the whole UPS work center to hear) at work for constantly harassing him for not meeting their unrealistic work expectations, then everyone(including the supervisors) in the center just stopped working and stayed quiet for a several minutes.

That's the reason why management at my work is too scared shitless to fire him before he becomes a Union member and protected from management harassment, lol.

Ever had work at a job with a similar situation like this?

adjl posted...

helly posted...

Dikitain posted...

s. Nintendo hasn't gotten a significant amount of 3rd party games for over 20 years.

did you forget that the wii happened

People tend to discount the Wii's third-party support. In general, people are rather bad at remembering the distinction between "this system has nothing" and "this system has nothing I like."

Pretty much. Many of the Wii's 3rd party games aren't even bad. It had Scarface: The World Is Yours, The Godfather, Bully: Scholarship Edition, Resident Evil 4, Manhunt 2 and Mortal Kombat Armageddon. It just so happens that a lot of the good 3rd party Wii games were overlooked due to many 3rd party shovelware games it's been receiving for a while, which is funny since the PS2 also had a lot of shovelware games, especially in it's later lifespan, yet no one bats an eye on the PS2 for having them.

Far-Queue posted...

Right, but you could just as easily as said "I didn't like Ghostbusters '16" and this whole inane back-and-forth would never have happened.

But you decided to vent your anti-feminist stuff. You decided to turn this from a discussion about a shitty movie into a pissing match over pronouns.

I'm not going back on anything I've posted. I'm not "trying" to sound calmer than you, or whatever. Just responding. If you find my replies offensive, I'd say calling you an insecure manchild pales in comparison to half the shit you've thrown my way.

Which by the way I've noticed you've edited some of them out. FYI I haven't marked anything, nor do I plan to. I honestly don't care about your opinion, I'm just tired of the whole SJW/anti-SJW thing. If you had posted the opposite, that GB16 was unjustly attacked by misogynistic woman-haters when it released, I would've been just as annoyed.

I didn't edit any of your statements(I copied and pasted it in one of my replies) but anyways, fair enough on your first two parts of your last reply to me, but again, just remember this. Opinions are like assholes and we should just deal with it if you don't like it or rubs you the wrong way.

Yellow posted...

Pretty sure no one normal uses GameFAQs console boards.

People are actually trying to say the Switch's library is already better than the Wii U.

Not really. I've been on the Switch board fairly long enough and it's mostly the other way around. People are already dismissing the Switch as "Nintendoomed" despite, being only around for about 5 months and with all the console shortage issues and all.

Far-Queue posted...

And once again, I don't care if the movie is SJW or not. I don't care one way or the other. I didn't even like the movie lol

I just thought it was funny that you're still so hot and bothered over something that happened like a year ago. You're the one that dredged up this old bullshit, then made your lame feminist rant. Now you're all pissy because I pointed out how silly your little tantrum is. I never posted in defense of the movie, just that the vitriol laid on Ghostbusters '16 is way overblown. Mostly by people like you.

Maybe it is a little overblown by many people but the fact remains that they're all still mere opinions and everyone has the right to express that, just like the both of us have the right to bicker on and on and insult each over here on this topic for god knows how long. You didn't even point out my "pissy little tantrum" when you took your first jab at me, all you did was name-callling, lol.

Guess what? Opinions are like assholes. That's just a part of everyday life, kiddo. DEAL WITH IT!

Far-Queue posted...

Right, @Juggernaut480 once again I'm saying you're insecure. I don't dispute that.

But this:

Where did I say that the casting choice alone made me "insecure"?

Note the bold in the quote. That's you saying that I claimed you said you were insecure. Which I didn't. Not once.

Can't believe I have to break this down to you like you're in elementary school.

And please, show me where I'm "going bonkers" over a difference of opinion. I'm certainly not the one throwing worthless insults about. Just made an observation based on your posts, which you're still worked up over.

Calling me an "insecure man-child" over me pointing out the movie's obvious flaws and controversy it caused while I expressed my complaint over the social issues it stirred and riled up. I've been trying to explain my complaints and opinions of this movie while pointing out some of your self-contradictions in one of your replies but instead, it feels like explaining all of this to you too much to is like trying to explain to someone who just hopped off the special ed short bus.

@Far-Queue

I'm getting the sudden feeling now that you're just a troll trying to completely change your side up of the flame war story and pretend that all of the things you mentioned or implied were things that I apparently "put words in your mouth". while you're still trying to make yourself out to be the innocent and "civil" one.

Again, we can keep going all day with the flame war. Keep coming at me bro, I honestly don't give a fuck. lol

@Far-Queue

"Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their s*** over the casting.

lol pathetic",

"lol "easily triggered"... this coming from someone who got their knickers in a twist over a couple women being cast in a movie.",

"All I did was point out your obvious insecurities. Which you then reaffirmed over and over with these posts filled with your lame attempts at insults. But sure, call me SJW or whatever if that makes you feel better with your insecure self."

You just flat admitted for the past several replies toward me(from you) that you called me insecure earlier and passive aggressively implied that I have misogynistic insecurities by pointing out that I got all bonkers over the casting choice, which for the millionth time, I gave out a very straight forward reason with full explanation and pointed out the SJW influence behind the reboot(which a blind man can see) and it has nothing to do with me hating women leads in movies, which you implied as well yet still make failed attempts of controverting. Yes you are still twisting the "insecurity" thing on me since you're the one that got all bonkers over my opinion that is different from yours.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/movies/ghostbusters-review-melissa-mccarthy-kristen-wiig.html

If this headline(link) isn't SJW to you, then I don't know what is.

Far-Queue posted...

@Juggernaut480

Speaking of illiterate... I never said you claimed to be insecure. I'm the one saying you are insecure, which I gleaned from your ranting against some perceived SJW feminist agenda. Try to keep up, buddy.

"I never said you claimed to be insecure"

LOL! You clearly are illiterate here because I never stated anywhere in my previous replies that you said that I claimed myself as "insecure". I said you keep twisting this "insecurity" thing on me when you resorted to insulting me with the worn-out "man-child" insult over me expressing a brutally honest opinion on what I thought was a shit movie with a god-forsakenly horrible attempt of a reboot while I called you out on your BS, then you retreated back and got all defensive.

Yup, keep twisting this whole "insecurity" on me and making yourself out to be the more "civil" and "innocent" one when you perceived me as some "misogynistic man child". All you're doing is denying your bullshit that you've been pulling here, like a typical internet coward. We can keep going all day you want with the flame wars, buddy, Your choice, lol.

Dikitain posted...

Jiggy101011 posted...

Juggernaut480 posted...

ZiggiStardust posted...

Jiggy101011 posted...

adjl posted...

What did you expect from a system board? They're always cesspools of angry fanboyism.

The Switch board gives a whole new meaning to fanboyism. Its a great system and I've pumped many hours into it already, however it is a companion console to either the PS4 or Xbox One, not a replacement for one. If you bought a Switch and are expecting full 3rd party support then you are delusional, the 2st party titles will be great and probably score well but many 3rd party studios and games are going to skip this console and Switch owners need to be ok with that fact.

this guy gets it

Technically the Switch is getting 3rd party support(Skyrim, FIFA 18, NBA 2K18, WWW 2K18, etc.), just most likely not a very strong one like the PS4 and Xbox One has been receiving.

I said it's not going to get full 3rd party support, and it's not. Battlefront 2, Destiny 2, Assassins Creed Origins, Shadow of Mordor 2 none of those holiday releases are coming to the Switch.

I think anybody expecting a Nintendo console to be a viable system for 3rd party games needs to pull their head out of their asses. Nintendo hasn't gotten a significant amount of 3rd party games for over 20 years. You buy Nintendo consoles for 1st and 2nd party games. If a 3rd party game comes out on it, great. If not, well no shit get a PC, PS4, or XBox One and accept reality.

The Gamecube actually had pretty good 3rd party support(Beyond Good and Evil, Mortal Kombat Deadly Alliance, Mortal Kombat Deception, Resident Evil REmake, Resident Evil 4, etc.). In fact, many of the Resident Evil games on the Gamecube, RE1 Remake, RE0 and RE4 were originally gonna be Nintendo Gamecube exclusives until they were all later ported to PC and PS and Xbox consoles(PS3, X360, Xbone, PS4, and PC), . Hell, even the original Wii had plenty of 3rd party support. It just so happens that the Wii didn't get the 3rd party support that gamers wanted(no GTA IV, no Bioshock, no Assassin's Creed, etc.) or that the Gamecube's 3rd party support wasn't quite strong enough since it never had a GTA game or main entry Final Fantasy game.

Far-Queue posted...

@Juggernaut480 the point that you're too sensitive to handle a casting decision in a movie. Your posts show how much it upsets you. All I did was point out how insecure and small-minded you must be to be so effected by something so trivial.

Also, you keep throwing that SJW label on me. Where in my posts do I take a stance for social justice? Point that out. How else have I insulted you, other than to point out that you're an insecure manchild? That you're redundant, and boring in your repeatedly echoing the same sentiments in each post? If you consider the latter an insult, you should take a gander at your posts and try to absorb what I've been saying before you respond.

Truth is, I don't care one way or the other about the whole SJW/anti-SJW argument. It's all a bunch of pointless bickering to me. (Not at all lost on me that I'm now caught up in said pointless bickering, mind you.)

All I did was point out your obvious insecurities. Which you then reaffirmed over and over with these posts filled with your lame attempts at insults. But sure, call me SJW or whatever if that makes you feel better with your insecure self.

Jesus christ, you sure are one complete illiterate dumbfuck, lol. Where did I say that the casting choice alone made me "insecure"? I'm complaining about their intention behind gender swapping their characters and even making the secretary an idiotic male while the original female secretary was no idiot at all, which clearly seems to be no coincidence. All that while Sony Pictures and Paul Feig handling criticism poorly by insulting their core audience and pulling the misogyny card on thrn.

Then you came along all butthurt on this topic and resorted to insulting me simply because I shared a blunt opinion you don't like. Then I called you out on your bullshit. Then you twist this around by making me out to be the "insecure" one.

What I'm expressing here again, is called an opinion, not a dick. Don't take it so hard up the ass like an insecure pansy like yourself, since the real insecure one here is you. lol

Far-Queue posted...

@Juggernaut480 Not so much an insult as it is fact at this point. Every riled up response you provide confirms this. Why come up with anything else when my first comment was so unbelievably on-point that I couldn't paint a better picture of you if I cared to?

Unlike you, I don't care for redundancy. I make my point, the point stands, I move forward. But go ahead, keep going over the same bullshit again and again.

What point? That I think this movie sucks monkey butts while all you did was act like a dumb SWJ keyboard warrior throwing insults at me? Cut your bullshit now, would you. lol

ZiggiStardust posted...

Jiggy101011 posted...

adjl posted...

What did you expect from a system board? They're always cesspools of angry fanboyism.

The Switch board gives a whole new meaning to fanboyism. Its a great system and I've pumped many hours into it already, however it is a companion console to either the PS4 or Xbox One, not a replacement for one. If you bought a Switch and are expecting full 3rd party support then you are delusional, the 2st party titles will be great and probably score well but many 3rd party studios and games are going to skip this console and Switch owners need to be ok with that fact.

this guy gets it

Technically the Switch is getting 3rd party support(Skyrim, FIFA 18, NBA 2K18, WWW 2K18, etc.), just most likely not a very strong one like the PS4 and Xbox One has been receiving.

That board is filled with crazy extreme fanboys and Anti-Nintendo trolls having nonstop flame wars at each other, what do you expect? lol

Far-Queue posted...

Zeus posted...

Far-Queue posted...

lol @ Zeus and @ Juggernaut480 are so cute together. Funny how when these types get all riled up they throw around that "cuck" and "snowflake" nonsense, as if that means anything.

Getting all bent out of shape over some perceived feminist agenda, but okay I'm the snowflake. Keep on coming back with that worn-out "Tumblr safe space cuck SJW" etc crap, since that's the only cards you two seem to have up your combined sleeves.

@Far-Queue Literally used neither so far

@Zeus oh? Check the bold, mate.

Zeus posted...

Outed as an SJW!

lol pathetic

Seems your memory is about as good as your imagination with these tired insults lol

Which you confirm this with this gem:

Zeus posted...

you're being kind of a cuck right now

You're so predictable that it's boring me at this point.

I know your whole schtick is that you keep commenting until the other person stops posting so you can stroke your ego-rection and feel like you "won" by having the last word. If you can't come back with something even remotely fresh or clever, rest assured you'll have another meaningless notch in your belt.

LMAO! Says the guy who still hasn't came up with a new comeback/insult towards me and Zeus aside from the same old "man children" insults that extremist libtards use on the internet whenever someone disagrees with them or doesn't share the same views as them.

Duck-I-Says posted...

Golden Road posted...

Oh, so people don't hate it because it has women in it. They hate it to spite the evil sjws. That's, um, that's so much better?

He's wrong. People don't like it because it's a bad movie. Most people don't give a shit about the SJW - antiSJW war.

Yeah, pretty much what you said, although you still can't deny the obvious SJW influence behind the reboot, which is my point I've been constantly trying to make here(pointing out how this reboot sucks monkey balls because it's simply bad and disrespected the original movie and it's core fanbase while it just so happens that it had obvious SJW Feminist messages written all over their advertisements, which is your cherry on top of a shit sundae).

ninjabay posted...

I hated the movie

Didn't like the jokes the characters were horrible (not because they are women) the story was kinda meh to me.

And people loved lots of movies with female leads, hell Wonder Woman this year has been a huge success. Sure there were idiots who complained simply because they were women but not everyone who didn't like the movie was because of that.

Yeah, I'm getting sick and tired of extreme leftist tards and trolls automatically pulling the "You're a sexist pig/Misogynist" card whenever anyone harshly criticizes this movie, even with many valid points/reasons. It should be a no brainer to them as to why plenty of female lead films in the past and recently(Wonder Woman live-action) succeed in the box office and pleased many movie audiences on all sides while GB 2016 fell flat on this.

Golden Road posted...

Juggernaut480 posted...

The vast majority people aren't hating it because it has women in it. Most people hate it because of the obvious intention(SJW motive) behind gender swapping the characters

Oh, so people don't hate it because it has women in it. They hate it to spite the evil sjws. That's, um, that's so much better?

Stop reading all the 1% of the genuinely misogynist comments about Ghostbusters 2016 having women in it and consider the fact that Sony Pictures deleted all the critical comments of this movie that actually have valid criticism and weren't misogynistic, to fit their SJW narrative, which the GB 2016 movie still couldn't even succeed with this, despite gullible people like you who buy into Sony Pictures and Paul Feig's "Everyone only hates this movie because of bigot misogynist pigs who hate women leads!" narrative.

MICHALECOLE posted...

KevinceKostner posted...

Can we just agree that the movie was terrible but also that there was a lot of unjustified hate against it as well?

I never saw it because it doesn't interest me. I didn't blindly hate it because it has women in it though.

The vast majority people aren't hating it because it has women in it. Most people hate it because of the obvious intention(SJW motive) behind gender swapping the characters, disconnecting the movie from the original(disrespecting that) and flat out insulting the core audience. If messages on the Ghostbusters 2016 advertisements saying "Girls Rule, Women are funny, Get over it." aren't SJWish or Radical Feminist to you, then I don't know what is.

If this was about "sexism/misogyny"(two words that get constantly thrown around a lot on the social media these days, the same way the word "racist" is thrown around a lot), then explain to me why multiple movies with female leads like the Alien franchise, Kill Bill, Wonder Woman(live-action) and Mad Max Fury Road were all beloved by movie audiences and a huge success while Ghostbusters 2016 flopped and was hated by many.

TheCyborgNinja posted...

The biggest problem with any argument involving "SJWs" (I can't think of a better description, sorry) is that they are fanatical in their views to the point they admit they're opinions but enforce them as facts due to some misguided moral high ground, whereas like anything in life, the truth exists somewhere in the middle most of the time.

The thing is, there's a painfully obvious truth to the SJW agenda theory of the Ghostbusters reboot since many of their advertisements flat out throw in "Girls Rule" or "Women are funny, get over it!" messages, even when the majority of the people harshly criticizing this movie aren't sexist and mostly criticized this reboot for disrespecting and disconnecting the original movie with cheap jokes, most of which are allegedly deleted by Sony Pictures so they can find the 1% of the comments that are genuinely misogynistic, to fit with their SJW narrative. On top of that, Sony Pictures threatened/blackmailed Bill Murray with litigation/legal action if he refused to make any cameo appearances in this movie.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/15/movies/ghostbusters-review-melissa-mccarthy-kristen-wiig.html

http://www.thewrap.com/sony-hack-attack-studio-considered-legal-action-against-ghostbusters-star-bill-murray/

http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Sony-Might-Sue-Bill-Murray-Playing-Ball-Ghostbusters-68651.html

TheCyborgNinja posted...

^While I agree that their choice of words does diminish the impact of their messaging, you aren't better than they are.

Well, it's difficult not to insult such people since they sure love to start flame wars and insults with people who disagree with them. After all, some of these same people who I disagree with and insult are usually the ones that want to legally and socially silence people for "offensive" or "wrong" opinions(basically anyone who doesn't subscribe to their SJW philosophies).

Far-Queue posted...

lol @Zeus and @Juggernaut480 are so cute together. Funny how when these types get all riled up they throw around that "cuck" and "snowflake" nonsense, as if that means anything.

Getting all bent out of shape over some perceived feminist agenda, but okay I'm the snowflake. Keep on coming back with that worn-out "Tumblr safe space cuck SJW" etc crap, since that's the only cards you two seem to have up your combined sleeves.

It's called having an opinion dipshit, lol. Deal with it. Do you have any better cards aside from the same old "insecure man-children" or "sexist pig" insults you have on your sleeves since you seem all bent up over people not sharing the same opinions as you? The "Sexist/Misogyny" and "Insecure Man-Children" card being pulled by extremist leftards are getting old, lol.

Far-Queue posted...

Juggernaut480 posted...

Far-Queue posted...

Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting.

lol pathetic

Well one thing for sure is that this discussion board or the internet in general is clearly NOT a "Safe Space" for easily triggered SJW idiots who resorts to calling anyone who disagrees with them "insecure man-children", lol.

lol "easily triggered"... this coming from someone who got their knickers in a twist over a couple women being cast in a movie.

Zeus posted...

Far-Queue posted...

Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting.

lol pathetic

Outed as an SJW!

lol pathetic

Speaking of "easily triggered"...

LOL! You sure are one easily trigger-able special snowflake, are you? Did you completely ignore the part where I mentioned that I have nothing against female Ghostbusters members as long as it respects the original movie and didn't deliberately insult the GB fanbase with SJW BS? I suggest you should go crawl back to Tumblr from where you belong since clearly Gamefaqs boards are a not a "Safe Space" for cucks like you.

TheCyborgNinja posted...

After seeing the quality of the writing in various previews and reviews, anything above 0% is an over-estimation of its quality. Paul Feig is an absolute hack that's only capable of entertaining dumbasses that also like the crap Chuck Lorre pedals. Not to mention that Melissa McCarthy and Leslie Jones can only play the same respective character over and over... God help us if they team up with Ben Stiller and his two different characters...

From what I've heard about Paul Feig, the guy is a cuck who suffers from self-hatred of being a male after being bullied a lot in high school by jocks or just by boys in general and then decided to take a jab back at "misogynist men" by trashing a classic movie franchise.

Far-Queue posted...

Also, TCs comment about the "3rd Wave Feminist agenda" outs him as one of those insecure man-children who lost their shit over the casting.

lol pathetic

Well one thing for sure is that this discussion board or the internet in general is clearly NOT a "Safe Space" for easily triggered SJW idiots who resorts to calling anyone who disagrees with them "insecure man-children", lol.

Golden Road posted...

I don't know how someone could see the ridiculous amount of vitriol aimed at this movie and think "wow, this movie's so overrated."

I was pointing how how this movie was overrated by "professional reviewers" gathered by Rotten Tomatoes.

Pus_N_Pecans posted...

tldr but it's not overrated at all. If anything, it's underrated, and I say that as someone who thinks it's actually pretty mediocre. The hate train for this thing is outrageous.

The hate train was pretty well deserved considering Sony Pictures and the director's intention of insulting the potential male audience and forcing their 3rd Wave Feminist agenda down on people's throats.

Rotten Tomatoes gave it a good score while most of the casual audience disliked it while the core audience refused to watch this movie to begin with?

While I believe people should stop depending on "Professional Reviewers" to figure out if whether or not a movie or video game is good, I think it's quite dumb how Rotten Tomatoes gave this crap movie a 73% rating, which is even one percent higher than Forest Gump so let than sink in for a minute.

Most of the reviews that Rotten Tomatoes gathered are from pretty biased SJW "Professional reviewers" who praised the movie based on it's political motives rather than it's actual story, acting and overall movie content. It was obvious that the director rebooted this film to deliberately piss off the original Ghostbusters fan base and male audience with this SJW feminist crap being shoved down our throats, when the GB fans could have gotten a movie sequel that they've been long asking for but instead were given an unnecessary SJW reboot that no one ever asked for.

I don't have anything against female Ghostbuster members as protagonists of the film at all as long as the film was a sequel and respected the original movie while the female Ghostbusters were brand new characters mentored by the original Ghostbusters members but no, instead we get a deliberately misandric and insulting reboot which I don't get what Paul Feig(director) hoped to have accomplished with this trying to make women "even" with men by making all the male characters complete idiots when the original Ghostbusters movie never made any of the female characters idiotic. All it did was bit Paul Feig back in the ass by having his GB reboot bomb in the box office, which he deserved for his and Sony Pictures' stupid decision of not handling criticism well at all and resorted to pulling the "misogynist" card on the critics and insulting them and core GB fanbase(which happens to be very predominantly male).

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/

experience?

I'd say Sony Playstation fanboys or "Sony Ponies" are the worst in my experience. They think they're better than the rest of gamers(including PC gamers) who don't game on Sony Playstation platforms, they treat Sony Playstation as if they're the 2nd coming of god and they refuse to admit defeat of their precious Sony Playstation consoles and handhelds(when the PS3 had it's ass handed to it in sales by the underpowered Wii or when the PSP was soundly beat by the original DS in sales or when the 3DS just flat out steamrolled and murdered the PS Vita in sales). I also notice how Sony fanboys will blindly defend any dumb or lame decision that Sony makes with their Playstation consoles while shitting on Nintendo for making similar business mistakes.

find scarier to fight as a kid during the SNES era?



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gbG_gzgyJI&t=496s

TheCyborgNinja posted...

I voted Ghostbusters. I hate Paul Feig, he's a talentless moron, and the "jokes" and writing I've seen from the new one all made me roll my eyes or sigh angrily.

It's obvious that Paul Feig is a typical SJW who's a self-hating male or a cuck. I just knew from the beginning since his trailer that he rebooted Ghostbusters into a Feminist propaganda just to deliberately piss off the fans of the original movie(which happens to be predominantly men/boys) due to him supposedly being bitter over being bullied by boys during his childhood(from what I've heard on the internet) and took it out on the entire male gender by shitting on one of most popular franchise of all time. Luckily, it bit him back in the ass when his SJW agenda-pushing shit film bombed in the box office, preventing him from making a sequel to this piece of anal fudge movie.

and a waste of time?

I honestly can't believe people often refer to mobile gaming as the "handheld gaming killer" when nearly all of their games are just freemium low quality repetitive crap or watered down ports of games that came from REAL gaming platforms(console, PC and handheld) along with shitty touch screen controls. At least with Handheld gaming, you have games that are actually worth your bucks due to the amount of effort and budget put into the games by handheld and console game developers compared to mobile game developers. Smartphones and tablets on the other hand, have different main purposes from handheld gaming, which is being a communication device or multimedia device.

People often state how handheld gaming is dead yet the original Nintendo DS up to this day, is still the 2nd best-selling gaming platform of all time(being a very close 2nd to the PS2), which sold 154.02 million worldwide(as of June 30, 2016) compared to the PS2's 155 million units sold(as of March 31st, 2012).

Handheld gaming is still a big thing in Japan because of how people in Japan actually walk and travel more often than Americans on average. It's obvious that the main target of mobile gaming are strictly people who are just very casual gamers.

Zeus posted...

Juggernaut480 posted...

Flamers truly believe in what they rant and argue with people about on the internet in the most obnoxious way possible just so they can feel that they "won" an argument or believe that they're "right" and you're "wrong"

Are you trying to coin a new expression? Because it'd be better if you didn't choose one with an existing meaning, since flamer has traditionally meant a person who is flamboyant in manner or dress. >_>

And, if you're looking for a word for somebody who just goes around insulting everybody, there are quite a few words for that already including "asshole," "jerk," and so on.

Flamer has two completely different definitions on the urban dictionary or on the internet in general. One is what you just described and the other is just being a jerk or triggered snowflake picking fights or arguments with people on the internet over not being able to agree to disagree or things not going his/her way.

Before you answer this poll, remember that there's a difference between internet flamers and internet trolls. Flamers truly believe in what they rant and argue with people about on the internet in the most obnoxious way possible just so they can feel that they "won" an argument or believe that they're "right" and you're "wrong" while Trolls cause problems and try to deliberately piss people off and start random internet arguments for either just the sake of it or for their own self-amusement.

PostCrisisJ2 posted...

Both. Anybody who says otherwise has never had the pleasure of actually dealing with both. One side throws a tantrum if you mention white men, another side throws a tantrum if you don't mention white men. It's like asking whether you'd want to be frozen to death or burned to death. One maybe less painful than the other but such a factor is meaningless because it's going to be an unpleasant experience regardless.

God forbid you deny "Straight White male privilege" right in SJWs' faces or god forbid you deny "White Genocide" right in Hardcore Alt Righters' faces.

At least with "Straight White Male Privilege", there are some degree of truths to it(regarding the white race part to it or just lighter skin in genreal) where "White Genocide" on the other hand, is just a flat out made-up term constructed by a bunch of whiny White Supremacists on the internet who call themselves "Nationalists", regarding consented race-mixing and multiculturalism in a few European countries(and all predominantly White Non-European countries) that ironically other White people(who aren't white supremacists) themselves allowed and welcomed into these countries, in the first place.

jamieyello3 posted...

Hardcore right wingers are harder to deal with because they never back down, they've been indoctrinated with a lifetime of a million conspiracies and angry radio hosts, you have to go through each and every thing and then it just gets deflected to some shitty thing Democrats did. SJWs can be taken down with simple logic and they usually block you afterward.

I'd rather just deal with some manhater.

Yeah, not only do hardcore right wingers never back down with their views, they also constantly live in their little delusional bubbles, truly believing that their opinionated rants and conspiracy theories are "facts and logic" without providing any valid, reliable sources to back up their claim. Then they'll either do as what you stated(switching topics by pointing out shitty things that Democrats did) or cry "White Genocide" or "Anti-White" while they treat consented racial miscegenation and welcomed multiculturalism as if they're morally worse than the Holocaust and mass murder, throwing the word "Genocide" around like hot potatoes since clearly neither of these fit with their views.

I would say they both are even when it comes to being annoying, miserable sack of shits(especially behind their computer screens/on the internet) since they both actually have one or two major things in common with each other than they think. Both only prefer to hear things that fits with their own world views while filtering out any other differing world views/opinions that doesn't fit with their own agendas.

Both SJWs and Alt Rights also seem to have a mutual hatred/dislike for people who are moderate/in the middle ground since they're too smart to not subscribe to either of their extremist philosophies and both are bigots in slightly different forms(with SJWs being more sneaky about their bigotry and White Supremacists being more lost and confused with who they should consider "true whites").

ParanoidObsessive posted...

Juggernaut480 posted...

Would you agree that Stormfront.org is one of the most stupid, ignorant discussion board websites on the internet?

One of THE most? No, because I've spent way too long on the Internet and have seen way too many things.

They're terrible, sure, but there's WAY worse out there.

Depends on what you mean by worse. Other websites being worse for things like subtle pedophilia and actual violence, then definitely. One of the worst sites as in for sheer contagious stupidity with obviously heavy racial, ethnic and religious bias, then Stormfront still falls under that.

BobToxsick posted...

So you were on a site you hate, reading a thread about something that you called ignorant, and thought it would be a good idea to come make the same thread on a different site? I guess I forget what it's like to not work and have that much free time

Again, I was only on it once for shits and giggles, lol. Obviously I was gonna expect nothing but stupidity on there.

Zeus posted...

Juggernaut480 posted...

Besides, the US and it's heavily flawed race and ethnicity category system tends to only pick 4-5 races and ethnic groups as options, when they should've added Mestizo and Mulatto for their race categories of the US Census, that way so some Hispanics from Latin America don't feel forced to select "white" as their race. Not to mention, they lump Middle Eastern and North Africans into the same group as the Caucasian ethnicity, lol.

So you'd have Mulatto but not Octoroon? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Come to think of it, are *either* of those PC any more? Obama was merely called black, for instance

I don't see what the Latin American terms Mulatto or Mestizo has anything to do with being PC when Latin America is anything but PC, lol. In some Latin American countries, people who look like Obama, see him as "white" or "mixed" while Americans still see him as "black" with their outdated One-Drop Rule logic, regardless if he's only half-black from his father and his other half being white from his mother. It's just how it is with certain countries or cultures.

Zeus posted...

Juggernaut480 posted...

I was just on Stormfront a few hours ago to read some threads for shits and giggles. A bunch of White Supremacists were arguing on SF boards if whether or not Semites and Middle Easterners/Arabs are "truly white", when anthropologists have proven that only 3 human races exists(Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid) and they have concluded that Semites and Middle Easterners are part of the Caucasoid race, which tends to fall under being racially white due to having white skull shape features.

White has multiple connotations. More importantly, we don't even use just 3 races to ID people in this country. And if that's your biggest complaint about StormFront, lol, just fucking lol...

Well no shit we don't use 3 races to ID people in the US, lol. These 3 races have their own sub-categories of group of humans with different but marginal features, thus making it even more complex.

Besides, the US and it's heavily flawed race and ethnicity category system tends to only pick 4-5 races and ethnic groups as options, when they should've added Mestizo and Mulatto for their race categories of the US Census, that way so some Hispanics from Latin America don't feel forced to select "white" as their race. Not to mention, they lump Middle Eastern and North Africans into the same group as the Caucasian ethnicity, lol.

Sensual_T_Rex posted...

I just want to know why I see so many asian women throwing up nazi salute and posing with confederate flags.

I dunno man. Maybe either from self-hatred or they're just desperate for white dick.