Lurker > darkjedilink

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 20
TopicCop that shot/killed suspect then planted evidence found not guilty.
darkjedilink
09/15/17 5:15:23 PM
#53
shockthemonkey posted...
darkjedilink posted...
shockthemonkey posted...
darkjedilink posted...
thelovefist posted...
There wasn't sufficient evidence to convict on a murder charge. What would be satisfactory here? To convict without evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?

If the victim is a minority, that's EXACTLY what they want.

So what do you think actually happened?

No idea. Considering the lack of DNA evidence on the gun, I would say the cop LIKELY planted it.

However, there's no evidence actually supporting that theory. You can't convict someone on what LIKELY happened.

So what's the point of stirring up stupid shit when even you believe he did it? It's not like you served on the jury and actually heard all the evidence, you're just complaining that people were hoping for justice.

Conviction without evidence is justice to you?
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPassive aggressive leaker, Chelsea Manning, disinvited from Harvard after CIA..
darkjedilink
09/15/17 4:25:09 PM
#69
CruelBuffalo posted...
darkjedilink posted...
CruelBuffalo posted...
darkjedilink posted...
gunplagirl posted...
Wow the misgensering

Her name is legally Chelsea and her gender is legally female. Follow the law.

Military law says he's a he, and his name is Bradley.

YOU follow the law.

Military law does not say she is a he. Try again.

Yes, it does, since transgendered people have never been allowed to openly serve.

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2017/01/20/manning-to-lose-transgender-benefits-dishonorable-discharge-army.html

Here's a military spokesperson referring to her with female pronouns. Have a nice day.

You're saying a military spokesperson broke protocol in a topic about military personnel breaking protocol....
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPassive aggressive leaker, Chelsea Manning, disinvited from Harvard after CIA..
darkjedilink
09/15/17 4:20:41 PM
#65
CruelBuffalo posted...
darkjedilink posted...
gunplagirl posted...
Wow the misgensering

Her name is legally Chelsea and her gender is legally female. Follow the law.

Military law says he's a he, and his name is Bradley.

YOU follow the law.

Military law does not say she is a he. Try again.

Yes, it does, since transgendered people have never been allowed to openly serve.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPassive aggressive leaker, Chelsea Manning, disinvited from Harvard after CIA..
darkjedilink
09/15/17 4:13:33 PM
#61
gunplagirl posted...
Wow the misgensering

Her name is legally Chelsea and her gender is legally female. Follow the law.

Military law says he's a he, and his name is Bradley.

YOU follow the law.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPassive aggressive leaker, Chelsea Manning, disinvited from Harvard after CIA..
darkjedilink
09/15/17 4:03:04 PM
#59
Unfernal_Server posted...
darkjedilink posted...
gunplagirl posted...
And btw, THIS is the state actively trouncing on her free speech on a subject she knows a hell of a lot about. But none of the usual subjects will say anything to this effect.

You lose freedom of speech when you join the military.

He knew that, and signed away his right to it upon enlistment.

Maybe he should have respected his chain of command?

How'd that go at Nuremberg. 'I was just following orders'

You've never served, have you?

If a service person sees something wrong, they have a duty and obligation to report it to their direct superior. If it's not handled to your satisfaction, you go above them, then again, and again, all the way up to the President of the United States if need be.

Not sell it to a child-raping tabloid artist for money, then magically become trans to avoid the death sentence.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPassive aggressive leaker, Chelsea Manning, disinvited from Harvard after CIA..
darkjedilink
09/15/17 3:55:08 PM
#56
RickyTheBAWSE posted...
Unfernal_Server posted...
also lol at all these keyboard warriors mocking chelsea manning, saying she's a whiner, etc. Like any of you could deal with solitary confinement...

they can't even deal with opposing views, lol.

they break down and attack when you ask that they provide evidence.

Like evidence that Michael Bennett was assaulted by police?
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPassive aggressive leaker, Chelsea Manning, disinvited from Harvard after CIA..
darkjedilink
09/15/17 3:48:20 PM
#52
gunplagirl posted...
And btw, THIS is the state actively trouncing on her free speech on a subject she knows a hell of a lot about. But none of the usual subjects will say anything to this effect.

You lose freedom of speech when you join the military.

He knew that, and signed away his right to it upon enlistment.

Maybe he should have respected his chain of command?
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPassive aggressive leaker, Chelsea Manning, disinvited from Harvard after CIA..
darkjedilink
09/15/17 3:36:09 PM
#43
CruelBuffalo posted...
darkjedilink posted...
CruelBuffalo posted...
Unfernal_Server posted...
darkjedilink posted...
I'll refer to Private Manning as a woman when Private Manning goes through boot camp and SOI as a woman.

Uhhh... okay? That's a weird bar to set, but whatever.

Lol agreed. I think her treatment in prison was abhorrent, and not upset with her release considering what she went through, but I won't label her a hero. Again this is just all from my point of view.

Manning's a traitor to the uniform, and deserves the death penalty. Excuse me for not crying about the treatment of such a person just because he chopped his dick off.

*yawn*

So do Reagan and Ollie North deserve the death penalty for Iran/Contra deal?

Did they violate chain of command and literally sell state secrets to a foreigner, then get hailed as a hero for chopping their dick off?

No? Because they weren't in the military?

GTFOH.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPassive aggressive leaker, Chelsea Manning, disinvited from Harvard after CIA..
darkjedilink
09/15/17 3:10:51 PM
#36
CruelBuffalo posted...
Unfernal_Server posted...
darkjedilink posted...
I'll refer to Private Manning as a woman when Private Manning goes through boot camp and SOI as a woman.

Uhhh... okay? That's a weird bar to set, but whatever.

Lol agreed. I think her treatment in prison was abhorrent, and not upset with her release considering what she went through, but I won't label her a hero. Again this is just all from my point of view.

Manning's a traitor to the uniform, and deserves the death penalty. Excuse me for not crying about the treatment of such a person just because he chopped his dick off.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicHillary compares herself to Cersei Lannister.
darkjedilink
09/15/17 2:55:32 PM
#47
Horus_Leftfield posted...
D-Lo_BrownTown posted...
Horus_Leftfield posted...
Santorin posted...
LightningAce11 posted...
What has Hillary done that's so evil? I never got a straight answer from CE.


Honestly if someone needs to explain this you will just dismiss.

idk what she done that's so evil either, apart from the bullshit conspiracies people pull out they ass


I'm really surprised this hasn't been said yet...

...but mother fucking BENGHAZI!!!

under reagan there was a whole barracks got blown up and people didn't try to exploit it to pillory nobody

Because Reagan didn't stymie investigations into what went wrong.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicCop that shot/killed suspect then planted evidence found not guilty.
darkjedilink
09/15/17 2:47:45 PM
#31
shockthemonkey posted...
darkjedilink posted...
thelovefist posted...
There wasn't sufficient evidence to convict on a murder charge. What would be satisfactory here? To convict without evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?

If the victim is a minority, that's EXACTLY what they want.

So what do you think actually happened?

No idea. Considering the lack of DNA evidence on the gun, I would say the cop LIKELY planted it.

However, there's no evidence actually supporting that theory. You can't convict someone on what LIKELY happened.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPassive aggressive leaker, Chelsea Manning, disinvited from Harvard after CIA..
darkjedilink
09/15/17 2:18:36 PM
#33
I'll refer to Private Manning as a woman when Private Manning goes through boot camp and SOI as a woman.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicCop that shot/killed suspect then planted evidence found not guilty.
darkjedilink
09/15/17 2:08:29 PM
#25
thelovefist posted...
There wasn't sufficient evidence to convict on a murder charge. What would be satisfactory here? To convict without evidence beyond a reasonable doubt?

If the victim is a minority, that's EXACTLY what they want.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/15/17 10:18:37 AM
#254
Asherlee10 posted...
UnfairRepresent posted...
Asherlee10 posted...
darkjedilink posted...
Imagine forcing a Jewish deli to serve a person who walks in wearing a swastika, or a Muslim restaurant being told they must put bacon on the items they sell for a customer, for zero reason other than that customer entered their privately-owned property.

I don't think these are good examples because a neo-nazi is not a protected class. Neither is the random person that is demanding bacon at a Muslim-owned deli.

What makes someone a protected class?

If neo Nazi was made one tomorrow would you support it because it us now a protected class?

Argue with logic that justifies your side. Not simply that the law supports it

Protected classes are often based on characteristics of a group of people that cannot be altered (race for example). Sometimes they are determined based on an event in history (how we have some creeds protected).

I don't think a neo Nazi would ever become a protected class because of the history of Nazis and their actions.

That alone makes his example a bad choice.

Muslims being protected kills this whole argument.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicHillary Clinton thinks the moral of 1984 was to trust the media *HRC confirms*
darkjedilink
09/14/17 8:33:23 PM
#54
ImTheMacheteGuy posted...
Mal_Fet posted...
ImTheMacheteGuy posted...
Mal_Fet posted...
Asherlee10 posted...
Yes, I'm lost as to how the excerpt is relevant to the topic title.

"Trump sows distrust of the press, just like the torturer did in 1984"

How can you not see what's right in front of your face here

The GOOD GUYS were distrustful of the media in 1984, and for a very good reason.


It wasn't even the media though. It was government propaganda.

Aren't two of the three major media outlets DNC cheerleaders

I mean, people who are freakshows probably say this. I have no idea. I don't watch any of them. I'm not just gonna believe they are because a dickhead and his dickhead followers say they are :P *shrug emoticon*

Wikileaks proves that CNN literally had the DNC ghostwrite or edit every article they printed on Hillary Clinton during the campaign.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicHillary Clinton thinks the moral of 1984 was to trust the media *HRC confirms*
darkjedilink
09/14/17 4:45:40 PM
#26
Liberals that read 1984 and don't stop being liberals don't get 1984.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicHillary Clinton thinks the moral of 1984 was to trust the media *HRC confirms*
darkjedilink
09/14/17 4:42:44 PM
#25
luigi13579 posted...
DuranOfForcena posted...
nothing about that paragraph says or implies anything even close to what the topic title claims it does

Pretty much.

The press and academics are obviously not infallible, but they're crucial in holding our elective representatives to account. Completely discrediting them essentially gives those in power a monopoly on information, which is authoritarian as fuck.

But the media actively worked for the DNC. Had she won, you think they would go back to being impartial?
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/14/17 2:43:04 PM
#233
shockthemonkey posted...
darkjedilink posted...
shockthemonkey posted...
darkjedilink posted...
shockthemonkey posted...
It wasn't against anyone's will. They agreed to follow the laws and regulations of operating a business. They consented. They were not forced to run a business. No one is forced to run a business.

Seriously what is so difficult about this?

Nobody forced the couple to use her bakery, either.

What's so difficult about that?

I'm not the one yelling about how someone is being forced to do something. Opening a public business means agreeing to serve the public. No one forced them to agree to that.

C7D posted...
shockthemonkey posted...
It wasn't against anyone's will. They agreed to follow the laws and regulations of operating a business. They consented. They were not forced to run a business. No one is forced to run a business.

Seriously what is so difficult about this?


Some businesses are members only. Churches are often used as venues for weddings. Many are highly ornate and are a wonderful place to get married. I married my wife in a church. Would you have the church forced to marry someone if it takes money for use of weddings?

Churches don't follow general business rules; they aren't (supposed to be) businesses. No one was buying a cake from a members-only cake club. If your argument can't even apply to the case at hand, it means you've lost.

So you believe a Jewish delicatessen must serve swastika-wearing Nazis?

Muslim caterers must serve pork chops at a gay pride event?

Yes, a Jewish deli should serve Nazis, although it's ridiculous to compare beliefs to innate, unchangeable facts about a person so it's not nearly the same.
No, Muslims don't need to serve pork chops. Consenting to start a catering business does not mean they will make any type of food.

Do you get the point yet?

But it's a gay pride event! They're discriminating!
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPit Bull FAQ - Dangerous Dogs
darkjedilink
09/14/17 2:41:42 PM
#16
pojr posted...
I've seen a pitbull rip apart another dog with blood everywhere

Yes the owner is not good with dogs

But no other dog has the same speed, power and potential to destroy like pitbulls do

I've seen a Jack Russel do it, too.

Breed doesn't mean shit. How responsible the owner is with the animal is.

Too many people buy dogs (well, any pet, really) without researching what they are getting, or what they're getting into.

Dogs are living, breathing animals, that need to be trained and socialized to live in harmony with people.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPit Bull FAQ - Dangerous Dogs
darkjedilink
09/14/17 11:04:11 AM
#9
Oh, and Chows bite more people than Pit Bulls.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPit Bull FAQ - Dangerous Dogs
darkjedilink
09/14/17 11:00:09 AM
#5
No dog breed is dangerous. It's entirely the fault of irresponsible owners not training and socializing their pet.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/14/17 10:00:33 AM
#229
shockthemonkey posted...
darkjedilink posted...
shockthemonkey posted...
It wasn't against anyone's will. They agreed to follow the laws and regulations of operating a business. They consented. They were not forced to run a business. No one is forced to run a business.

Seriously what is so difficult about this?

Nobody forced the couple to use her bakery, either.

What's so difficult about that?

I'm not the one yelling about how someone is being forced to do something. Opening a public business means agreeing to serve the public. No one forced them to agree to that.

C7D posted...
shockthemonkey posted...
It wasn't against anyone's will. They agreed to follow the laws and regulations of operating a business. They consented. They were not forced to run a business. No one is forced to run a business.

Seriously what is so difficult about this?


Some businesses are members only. Churches are often used as venues for weddings. Many are highly ornate and are a wonderful place to get married. I married my wife in a church. Would you have the church forced to marry someone if it takes money for use of weddings?

Churches don't follow general business rules; they aren't (supposed to be) businesses. No one was buying a cake from a members-only cake club. If your argument can't even apply to the case at hand, it means you've lost.

So you believe a Jewish delicatessen must serve swastika-wearing Nazis?

Muslim caterers must serve pork chops at a gay pride event?
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/14/17 9:52:43 AM
#223
shockthemonkey posted...
It wasn't against anyone's will. They agreed to follow the laws and regulations of operating a business. They consented. They were not forced to run a business. No one is forced to run a business.

Seriously what is so difficult about this?

Nobody forced the couple to use her bakery, either.

What's so difficult about that?
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/14/17 9:30:42 AM
#219
shockthemonkey posted...
C7D posted...
UnfairRepresent posted...
"The law is the law and therefore right" is a dumb argument from people who have no actual point

Slavery and segregation used to be law. We currently have drugs laws.

It's not about law. It's about justification


We have laws in place that compel our citizens to buy a product and laws in place that apparently compel our citizens to provide goods and services against their conscience in order to appeal to those whom they feel are morally repugnant. I wonder what the law will compel us to do next.

In a free society, the cake baker or photographer, providers of nonessential services, would be free to choose their clientele. This is no different than if the photographer or baker would choose not to participate in weddings for satanists. I'm beginning to wonder how much longer they may have that right.

The heart of this agenda is not tolerance. It is acceptance which requires beating down anyone who disagrees with them. While they claim to be against bullying, they sure carry a big stick in the form of the court system

The heart of it is acknowledging that running a business in this country means running a business under the laws and regulations of this country. There are anti-discrimination laws in place and there is no compelling reason why LGBT people should be excluded from those protections.

Running a discriminatory business is not a right.

There are also laws protecting people's religious expression. Laws that the government violated by forcing her to enter a business transaction against her will.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/13/17 9:23:20 PM
#213
Questionmarktarius posted...
koteka

So, you're shitposting.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/13/17 8:59:31 PM
#210
Questionmarktarius posted...
darkjedilink posted...
Did you just try to equate sexual misconduct to wanting your religious rights upheld?

Are you suggesting there can't be a religion that forbids covered scrotums?

Show me there is one, or stop shitposting.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/13/17 8:55:22 PM
#207
shockthemonkey posted...
Businesses choose to operate under the laws of the country. Those laws already include anti-discrimination protections. Of course LGBT people should be protected by those laws.

No one is forcing them to be their chosen profession - by doing their job, they are agreeing to do it by the laws and regulations of this country.

No one would even think that it's ok for a school bus driver to wave his nutsack at children. By agreeing to be a bus driver, he's agreeing to not wave his nutsack at children. He's agreeing that he will abide by the laws of the road, remain sober, not wave his nutsack at children, and not discriminate against the school children.

Did you just try to equate sexual misconduct to wanting your religious rights upheld?
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/13/17 8:45:06 PM
#205
A_Good_Boy posted...
darkjedilink posted...
Squidkids posted...
darkjedilink posted...
Sir Will posted...
Paragon21XX posted...
You aren't God, so you have no business telling them that they should have to violate their conscience because society believes gay marriage is perfectly acceptable

Don't work a public serving business.

Literally arguing that businesses enter a legally binding service contract against their will the moment someone enters the building.

in a way they do

Such an argument is a violation of almost every individual right in existence.

The Civil Rights Act must chafe your butt then.

Considering it's application in these cases is a violation of private property rights and contract law, yeah. You're explicitly stating that a business contract must be entered at gunpoint by one party, and they have zero legal recourse.

Imagine forcing a Jewish deli to serve a person who walks in wearing a swastika, or a Muslim restaurant being told they must put bacon on the items they sell for a customer, for zero reason other than that customer entered their privately-owned property. Are you saying that these customers must be served by these businesses? Your arguments say they must.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/13/17 8:30:07 PM
#200
Squidkids posted...
darkjedilink posted...
Sir Will posted...
Paragon21XX posted...
You aren't God, so you have no business telling them that they should have to violate their conscience because society believes gay marriage is perfectly acceptable

Don't work a public serving business.

Literally arguing that businesses enter a legally binding service contract against their will the moment someone enters the building.

in a way they do

Such an argument is a violation of almost every individual right in existence.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/13/17 8:29:13 PM
#199
gunplagirl posted...
Questionmarktarius posted...
Sir Will posted...
Questionmarktarius posted...
Plastic caketoppers aren't quite so generic.

This is about more than a fucking cake.

Should we oblige a muslim caterer to provide service to a Beer & Bacon Fest?

If you think the two are similar you're wrong

Not if it were a Gay Pride Beer & Bacon Fest.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicA 2 bedroom is $600. Meanwhile minimum wage is still $8.90 . . .
darkjedilink
09/13/17 2:42:12 PM
#28
My last two-bedroom apartment was $625. Rural area, not Section 8.

Still waiting on why ONE person needs a TWO bedroom apartment.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/13/17 2:36:44 PM
#193
Sir Will posted...
Paragon21XX posted...
You aren't God, so you have no business telling them that they should have to violate their conscience because society believes gay marriage is perfectly acceptable

Don't work a public serving business.

Literally arguing that businesses enter a legally binding service contract against their will the moment someone enters the building.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTrump, Sessions: Buisnesses have a right to discriminate against LGBT
darkjedilink
09/13/17 2:31:09 PM
#191
jayj420 posted...
Does this mean we can also have a "no racist white guys" sign up?

Plenty of businesses have done that.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
Topicinteresting post about white privilege i found on FB
darkjedilink
09/13/17 2:13:03 PM
#61
mario2000 posted...
suggesting that minorities be able to achieve the same resources and social standing as whites is anti-white sentiment didn't you know

It is when you do it at the expense of white people.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
Topicinteresting post about white privilege i found on FB
darkjedilink
09/13/17 2:12:02 PM
#60
Darkman124 posted...
FLUFFYGERM posted...
anyone pretending that "white privilege" isn't a precursor to being asked and expected to do things if you're white is outright lying

https://www.leoweekly.com/2017/08/white-people/


the main thing asked of privileged people is 'be vigilant for shitheads' which i think is not a lot to request.

privilege is a tool. it can be used simply for comfort, or it can additionally be used to help protect those without it from assholes.

i won't comment on the link except to note that there are shitheads everywhere, including among those who think they're helping. this does not mean that there are equal numbers of shitheads in every group.

'If you have a house, white people, give it to a minority.'
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicI made a mexican inspired asian dish! Rate my dinner!!
darkjedilink
09/13/17 1:16:36 PM
#17
Looks good. Some CEmen will accuse you of cultural appropriation, though.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicI thought Clinton's book was supposed to be a mea culpa?
darkjedilink
09/13/17 10:31:19 AM
#27
shockthemonkey posted...
krazychao5 posted...
Funny how she blames the media. What did they do to make her lose? They were all pulling for her.

Because they focused on scandals to the point of ignoring policy, which is a valid complaint.

Maybe she shouldn't have ran for President of the United States with all the scandals following her.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicLeaked document shows that EU leaders want to censor internet like China does
darkjedilink
09/13/17 3:20:27 AM
#51
s0nicfan posted...
That's why it's so screwed up that we demonize fascists (rightfully so) but allow people to walk around being openly communist. Ultimately they're the same thing.

Better not say that - you'll get called a Nazi, then someone will try to suckerpunch you.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTransgender rapist who was moved to womens jail segregated after making advances
darkjedilink
09/13/17 3:18:19 AM
#65
sondast posted...
If she had a £10,000 sex change operation then how does she still have a penis?

Because just getting boobs bolted on counts as a sex change.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTransgender rapist who was moved to womens jail segregated after making advances
darkjedilink
09/13/17 3:17:41 AM
#64
Mr_Biscuit posted...
I don't know very many liberals who would say a rapist who claims to be female but still has a functioning penis should go to a women's jail. There's still a line.

There's a couple in this very topic.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPerson A calls person B the N word and person B starts punching them, whos wrong
darkjedilink
09/12/17 9:17:08 PM
#87
Counundrum posted...
Both are in the wrong but A clearly used provocative language to incite a reaction from B. Freedom of Speech doesn't cover language that could be used to incite violence so they can't use that has a defence.

The n-word, by itself, doesn't incite violence. Ergo, using it is protected by the First Amendment.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicPerson A calls person B the N word and person B starts punching them, whos wrong
darkjedilink
09/12/17 9:15:20 PM
#86
The Admiral posted...
They're both wrong, but the person engaging in violence is more wrong and also a criminal.

---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
Topicblack people cant be racist. student shut down for claiming otherwise.
darkjedilink
09/12/17 6:15:23 PM
#68
We all know he won't answer, because the whole idea of 'privilege plus power' is an imaginary concept they concocted to excuse their racism.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicTo those complaining about multiple streaming services. Here's a shocking fact
darkjedilink
09/12/17 6:11:18 PM
#11
Amazon_Shampoo posted...
I never thought I would say this sentence but.....

You have a valid point Cotton Eye Joe, but what if I have 5 shows I really like and all 5 are on different services? What if I had no desire to watch every show but only these 5. Paying for 5 services to do so and then watching nothing else seems like a waste.

Your username made that more fun to type then I want to admit.

Google 'project free tv'
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicDoes gasoline octane rating work this way? Question for car fanatics
darkjedilink
09/12/17 5:38:20 PM
#8
Put in whichever one doesn't have ethanol.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicAnyone else notice how Christians want to enjoy being a protected class...
darkjedilink
09/12/17 5:33:52 PM
#25
jayj420 posted...
darkjedilink posted...
jayj420 posted...
yemmy posted...
jayj420 posted...
darkjedilink posted...
At worst, they're no worse than BLM.

BLM isn't trying to discriminate, they are fighting against discrimination.

Kinda funny how the alt-right thinks of anyone defending their rights as being as big of a problem as people who want to take them away.


BLM doesn't let white people in their groups a lot of the time. This is why there are white groups like "Ferguson Freedom Fighters". Because BLM will not let them join.

Explain how that isn't discrimination?

Well they aren't trying to take away civil rights for protected groups for example... and you are just looking at the attitudes of a few protesters, not the kind of things that the greater group is trying to accomplish.

You can make the exact same argument about Christianity.

I sure hope so, and you are correct in the sense of the actual church of Christianity, but that doesn't seem to stop all the hardcore conservatives from using Christianity as an excuse to be a bigot.

Just like BLM.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
TopicAnyone else notice how Christians want to enjoy being a protected class...
darkjedilink
09/12/17 5:16:29 PM
#23
jayj420 posted...
yemmy posted...
jayj420 posted...
darkjedilink posted...
At worst, they're no worse than BLM.

BLM isn't trying to discriminate, they are fighting against discrimination.

Kinda funny how the alt-right thinks of anyone defending their rights as being as big of a problem as people who want to take them away.


BLM doesn't let white people in their groups a lot of the time. This is why there are white groups like "Ferguson Freedom Fighters". Because BLM will not let them join.

Explain how that isn't discrimination?

Well they aren't trying to take away civil rights for protected groups for example... and you are just looking at the attitudes of a few protesters, not the kind of things that the greater group is trying to accomplish.

You can make the exact same argument about Christianity.
---
'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen
Board List
Page List: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 20