Lurker > darkoj

I'm just being friendly. You mentioned that you love something, in a sarcastic way I know, but I used it an opportunity to change course in our exchange. Love's what's life's made of. It's good to love love.

I do hold Pulp Fiction in high regard, and I am dismayed to hear it's riveting dialogue tarnished in partisan politics.

I did vote for Trump, yes, but no, I'm not a huge supporter. I didn't decide to cast my vote for him until I was standing at the ballot box considering the ridiculous candidates presented to us, and I chose the one who I thought offered the highest probability for change. I refuse to embrace the negative stigmas assigned to Trump by the media, just like I refrain from believing him to be the Savior of our nation like his ardent supporters seem to. I'm keeping an open mind to his presidency, and I encourage others to do the same.
---

PSN: darkoj-
Destiny is my mental stimulant, Dark Souls is my narcotic for a dark soul.

I love too, I'm glad you do also :)
---

PSN: darkoj-
Destiny is my mental stimulant, Dark Souls is my narcotic for a dark soul.

knivesX2004 posted...

Your post was a single run on sentence. There's really not much to cherry pick.

Each of your retorts are a fallacy, so I'll forego responding to you any further after this, since you lack the ability to form a credible argument.

The act of cherry picking a statement is not dependent on whether a statement is expressed in a grammatically correct sentence or not; however, not only is my statement, indeed, grammatical correct,

darkoj posted...

The Dems desperation is most detectable and repugnant when they have Samuel L Jackson selling out one of the most iconic moments in cinema history, and certainly a highlight of his own career, by having him flatly rehearse Pulp Fiction as an ominous call to arms for the Democratic party.

but it expresses nuanced thought in a technically proficient manner, replete with proper punctuation and dramatic emphasis. You'll likely gasp at another long, well punctuated, articulate, and grammatically correct sentence of mine (gasp, a semicolon!), but I delight in thoughtful expression and playful wittiness, so alas, my pleasure can be your bane.

You've truly actualized nearly all elements of poor argumentative skills in your exchange with me. It's surprising and sad. I'm not sure if you lack sufficient comprehension abilities, or if you are just a troll, but taking a look at your account, I'm dismayed to find that you are of age to vote, and are potentially casting ballots in spite of your reasoning deficiencies. Allow me to detail your errors, since it's clear that you struggle at critical analysis:

First, you misinterpret what I said and create a false narrative.

knivesX2004 posted...

So now celebrities can't be in politics?

Secondly, you selectively quote me to fit your false narrative, and completely fabricate a quote that you attribute to me, meanwhile ignoring the most relevant content of my statement.

knivesX2004 posted...

Actually it is exactly what you implied because you said it was "repugnant" for Sam Jackson "selling out" in a "desperation move for dems".

Lastly, being unable to logically defend your own assertions, you attempt to undermine the credibility of my argument by erroneously claiming it to be grammatically unsound, and therefore, implicitly invalid, which is logically unsound.

knivesX2004 posted...

Your post was a single run on sentence. There's really not much to cherry pick.

It's like you took a course through Reddit on how to construct fallacious dialogues and followed it like a scholar. It's ironically impressive and undeniably sad; I suppose that's the fruit of trolling the internet for a decade and a half.

Good day and luck to you, knives.
---

PSN: darkoj-
Destiny is my mental stimulant, Dark Souls is my narcotic for a dark soul.

knivesX2004 posted...

Actually it is exactly what you implied because you said it was "repugnant" for Sam Jackson "selling out" in a "desperation move for dems".

If that's not what you meant perhaps reword your post next time so it can be understood.

Perhaps you should consider my actual criticism, that being:

darkoj posted...

Samuel L Jackson selling out one of the most iconic moments in cinema history, and certainly a highlight of his own career, by having him flatly rehearse Pulp Fiction as an ominous call to arms for the Democratic party

instead of cherry picking my statement to fit your own narrative. This includes you falsifying my own words by quoting me as having ever stated

knivesX2004 posted...

"desperation move for dems".

---

PSN: darkoj-
Destiny is my mental stimulant, Dark Souls is my narcotic for a dark soul.

knivesX2004 posted...

So now celebrities can't be in politics?

Ya, not what I said, nor implied, but to answer your question, no, I'm not fond of celebrities being involved in politics through polarizing ads.
---

PSN: darkoj-
Destiny is my mental stimulant, Dark Souls is my narcotic for a dark soul.

Ossoff collected the majority of his money through out of state contributions, as the Democratic party desperately attempted to take a small step closer to parity with the Republican party within Congress. Ossoff's apparently massive support was due to the Democratic base collectively rallying behind this figure due to intense advertising. The Republican base's vote was largely split amongst many candidates, therefore each contender's share of the vote was comparatively small to Ossoff's. Now that Ossoff failed to win outright, he'll lose outright in the run off.

The Dems desperation is most detectable and repugnant when they have Samuel L Jackson selling out one of the most iconic moments in cinema history, and certainly a highlight of his own career, by having him flatly rehearse Pulp Fiction as an ominous call to arms for the Democratic party. Trump's begging; let me tell you...

Misleading OP is misleading.
---

PSN: darkoj-
Destiny is my mental stimulant, Dark Souls is my narcotic for a dark soul.

My neighbors have 3 Chihuahuas that will bark endlessly if they detect anyone in the immediate vicinity. It's spring time now, and I like to enjoy my backyard in peace and quiet; therefore, these littles pricks really irritate me when they prevent me from enjoying the property that I pay good money to inhabit.

I came up with a quick and easy solution for the problem. It's so effective, that the dogs are brought inside their home within a matter of minutes from when I implement my tactic. I place a 200 watt, 5 speaker amplifier, comprised of a single 12" downward facing subwoofer, two 5" mid range speakers, and two 2.5" tweeters, right in front of these rodents and blast the recording of angry dogs barking, streamed from YouTube, right back at them. They immediately retreat from the fence, still barking of course, to the backdoor of their home, allowing their owner to enjoy their shrill harassment as well as my deafening sonic assault.

Yes, I'm passive aggressive. Yes, I feel somewhat guilty after doing it. Yes, I take pleasure in my success.
---

PSN: darkoj-
Destiny is my mental stimulant, Dark Souls is my narcotic for a dark soul.