Lurker > Mr_Karate_II

ZangsBeard posted...

What, child?

Don't be obtuse, you know what you said.

Beveren_Rabbit posted...

use a fan, open some windows, dress in loose clothing, drink plenty of water :)

Totally works when it's 100 outside

ZangsBeard posted...

Did you really have to use that word to describe what happened?

Where's the resident CE cop? Let's see his take on it.

Shit like this is why people don't like nor trust cops. The bad apples need to be dealt with but unfortunately that's never going to happen

When I do order pizza for delivery, it's usually a $2 to $3 tip depending if they get here on time or not.

TentacleDemon posted...

Are you a fan of Little Ceasar's hot and ready deal?

I don't get pizza from there anymore because it's garbage pizza.

Domino's is better and a better deal.

DocileOrangeCup posted...

Domino's has a really good deal for delivery

I usually go with the two or more items for $6.99 when I want delivery. More often than not I just get the $7.99 3 item large pizza carryout deal. You can't beat a large pizza for $7.99.

GMAK2442 posted...

Way too expensive for me too. A pizza should cost like 30$ max.

Hell no especially for one pizza.

Mad-Dogg posted...

Yeah. Not going to deny that the teenagers during the mid 90s was always wild'n the fuck out and was most likely always robbing the delivery people in those days. Hell we had a nice convenience store that I used to love riding my bike to as a kid at one of the entraces to the suburbs we live at and the same group of guys got that place to permanently close down also because they kept robbing the damn place.

It was bad enough that the cops actually built a small police station at the baseball field. Well the city wanted the suburbs I am at cleaned up anyway since that huge baseball field was constantly used by the city in general and they didn't want all those knuckleheads around the kids. I'd say around 2005 or so was when the truly asshole'ish people was cleaned out (although papa johns was like fuck it at some point all after the fact) and all thats left here is mostly elderly people, families, and certain houses that sell weed.

Like I said before though, once a neighborhood is blacklisted like that then its not removed ever, so despite it being nowhere near as crazy as it was in the 90s no delivery pizza for me. Stuff like grubhub/door dash etc. is the best we got.

And pay way more than what the pizza is worth.

Smashingpmkns posted...

Not sure if the leaks were intentional but they definitely weren't doing their best to prevent crew members from leaking it. Iirc there was a leaked pic from what looked like editing software. Most people wouldn't have access to that.

That's what leads me to believe maybe it was them who leaked all the stuff. Like how could they not figure out who was the leaker.

I feel like the guy who leaks all this stuff about Marvel/Sony has to be on the sets or know someone who is.

What a selfish thing to do.

Northlane posted...

I always suspected the 4k video of Andrew Garfield was a Sony leak

To add to the Hype the movie was getting after the initial leaks.

Murphiroth posted...

Burden of proof is on you my guy, you're the one making the initial claim.

It's far, far more likely with Sony's history of sheer incompetence regarding leaks that this wasn't some kind of deliberate marketing leak.

No, I asked a question then said i think it could have been Sony themselves, someone who works for Sony who was on set or the leaker knows someone who works for Sony or is on set and gets the info from them.

I never said it was Sony themselves

Super_Slash posted...

lol, that's not how the burden of proof works. Are you trolling or just dense?

I never actually claimed Sony was behind the leaks, I asked a question. You denied they did while providing no proof they didn't.

How do you not watch a movie in 8 years?

KobiusBrandle_F posted...

no

Yet nobody can't prove Sony wasn't behind the leaks.

Etna posted...

No Mr_Karate_II. Its not my job to educate Mr_Karate_You

So you can't prove they weren't behind the leaks?

If they weren't then they allowed the leaks to continue, it wouldn't have been too difficult to figure who leaked the info.

Etna posted...

No

Prove they weren't since you're claiming they're not.

There was little to no marketing done to hype up the movie but all the leaks got people hyped up. The guys who name i can't remember posted set photos, video,costumes,who was going to be in it including Daredevil,Green Goblin,Sandman,The Lizard,Doc Ock,Tobey and Andrew.

Sony did very little to market the movie, I think it was either Sony themselves, someone who works with Sony who's on set or the leaker knows someone who works with Sony.

Pretty sure this is the same leaker who gave info about No Way Home.

samsungsalt posted...

it's here

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/a/user_image/1/9/6/AAfNO8AADfMU.jpg

Looks unappealing

Domino's is way cheaper and don't order thru delivery apps. They charge more than what the pizza is worth.

ThanksUglyGod posted...

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever trailer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlOB3UALvrQ

The trailer alone saved Phase 4 for me!

I can't fucking wait

On episode 7 currently, I get the hype around the show.

It's been really good and I've enjoyed it.

TheGoldenEel posted...

Wait until all the episodes drop my dude

That's ridiculous really and avoiding spoilers can be tricky.

Netflix does it right by releasing a season all at once, people who want to wait a week still can.

I like binge watching shows because it's easier for me to carve out time for a day or two to watch the show. It's just more convenient plus I don't have to pay for more than a month to watch a show on Netflix.

Makeveli_lives posted...

Allegedly. We only saw his outfit not his face could be a copy cat.

There was rumors that he is in the show, more often than not the rumors are true. Pretty sure the person who said this is the same person who leaked info about No Way Home that turned out to be true.

The only problem I have with D+ is the weekly episodes. Netflix has the right idea with releasing an entire season at once.

There really should be an option for waiting a week or binge watching the show.

So you objectify women?

Number090684 posted...

I don't think self defense is going to fly because the worker took the boiling water back over to the irrational customers and scalded them with it instead of calling the police first. Chances are the customers are going to get a comfy lawsuit settlement and the worker is terminated and facing assault charges.

This

CanuckCowboy posted...

I mean anyone can turn down sex for any reason but bringing consent into it just seems fake or disingenuous.

If it was the first time then yeah that makes total sense, but I'm an established relationship where you've already fucked a buncha times consent isn't an issue in this scenario at all.

It is when someone is drunk or under the influence of drugs.

Murphiroth posted...

You're the kind of guy who thinks fast food employees exist to be berated and jerked around by customers.

Don't put words in my mouth or assume you know shit about me because you don't.

TheOtherMike posted...

Sounds like the adult that took the child behind the counter with her needs to face child endangerment charges.

Watch the video, the adult did not bring the child behind the counter with her.

TheOtherMike posted...

You would be mistaken.

1. No.
2. Even if it was, that's acceptable and legal with self-defense, especially if you don't have non-lethal options.

No one said they could do whatever they want, but they can defend themselves from an angry customer who literally trespasses behind the counter and approaches employees.

The employee has to prove it was self defense.

TheOtherMike posted...

It indisputably and objectively is.

Nope

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Without audio we don't know who started it or why the customer went behind the counter. Throwing boiling water onto someone is fucked up especially since the minor was also hit with the water.

If the hospital report/records say the woman was transported to the ICU burn ward then there's no disputing that.

I assume there are police reports too.

The employee went overboard and the customer shouldn't have attempted to go behind the counter BUT she wasn't even really behind it.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Fucking A!

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

No it's not

The employee has to prove it was self defense and they were being threatened

TheOtherMike posted...

Taco Bells don't have "boilers." In the video in the op you can clearly see her dip the pitcher into the pit and run it out to the counter at 1:15.

She didn't need to throw boiling fucking water on the adult or minor. She took her time to gather the boiling water.

Apparently it's ok to permanently injure the adult and minor.

The customer wasn't armed, wasn't throwing hands or anything of the sorts.

Neither party was right BUT throwing boiling fucking water on a minor is fucked up.

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

Nope

While on the way to the hospital, the suit continues, Davis began suffering a seizure. After reaching the hospital, Davis was transported by medical helicopter to a local ICU burn unit. The minor was taken by ground to another hospital

what in the actual fuck?

The employee caused serious permanent damage to the adult and minor....

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

It's still fucked up to do

[LFAQs-redacted-quote]

This

TheOtherMike posted...

Self defense isn't "cruelty." What other weapon should the employees used to defend themselves?

Using boiling water is cruelty

Smashingpmkns posted...

Tbh the absolute fucking unnecessary cruelty of pouring boiling water on someone and those customers being assholes can both be true. Wtf is wrong with people? Being a piece of shit over some garbage fast food, getting paid shit wages to assault someone. We shouldn't act like this.

Exactly

Sega97 posted...

Of course people who can't behave in public have this mentality

I've never had a confrontation with a fast food employee or restaurant employee over a messed up order. I tell them it was messed up and they make a new order to fix it.

Don't assume shit about me.

TheOtherMike posted...

The employee was chasing an aggressor out the door. There was no "attack." The employee was acting in self defense, period.

You still can't chase someone, the employee became the aggressor at that point. Chasing someone isn't self defense