Lurker > televigilante

1. Learning to play an instrument
2. Saying whatever you want freely somewhere else
3. Learning a new language
4. Going for a jog
5. Lifting weights
6. Reading a scientific research article
7. Watching a documentary
8. Exposing yourself to sunlight
9. Attempting to figure something out with brainpower
10. Cooking a new dish

wasnt a fun time.

Hes also definitely not the only comedian that laughs at his own jokes

HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!! I wake up to take a piss, and they are saying something about Will Smith on BBC radio and I dont think anything about it, then I pick up my phone as I get back in bed, and the internet is exploding. My first thought as I see the video is, wow, Chris was so damn professional!. He took that punch like a champ. Was will Smith drunk? Imagine loosing your shit over a G. I. Jane joke. Secondly, why are people calling that a slap? Either that was a pretty meaty right hook, or some mighty fine sound effect work that make the foley artists on the old Walker Texas Ranger show look like a bunch of rank amateurs.

How is pressing charges for someone assaulting you a bad look, or make you a bitch?

Hey I saw that tweet 2 hours ago too haha!

Actually a mile has 5,280 feet

I tried watching the first few minutes and literally every sentence is wrong. It would take way more time than even my stupid ass could tolerate to list every way this video is a crock of shit, but some highlights

-Tries painting censorship of art on grounds of offending people as something new. Anybody who has any awareness of books knows that theyve been censored, banned, edited, prefaced, every which way to serve every possible political agenda at this point. Huckleberry Finn gets censored because of the n-word. Picture of Dorian Gray was...well, it was the Picture of Dorian Gray.

-Makes the assumption that wokeness is unprofitable without any sources. Very tellingly, he never defines wokeness. Is Black Panther woke? Is Avatar woke? Without setting a metric, it allows him to point to anything as an example of his point, while dismissing any counter-claim as invalid.

-Makes the claim that fans used to be divided over less serious things, like Kirk vs Picard. Anybody who actually lived through these decades knows for a fact that fan divisions and rivalries could be just as toxic and vitriolic as they are now. Nintendo vs Sega. Marvel vs DC. Professional wrestling.

-Again, quite nefariously, he makes it a point that wokeness is dividing fanbases from the perspective of inserting woke values is the problem, but is very silent about reactions to those values. No matter how shitty The Last Jedi was, for example, it doesnt excuse harassing Kelly Marie Tran. But the toxicity of anti woke audience is swept under the rug.

And just from a general overview, he makes the claim that Hollywood wants to subvert our values without saying who in Hollywood is doing this or even what our values are that theyre supposed to be subverting.

By making these sinister claims but not explaining what they actually mean, he allows his audience to fill in the blanks with their own imagination, in the same way that fraudulent psychics will make vague claims about your life and let you fill in the details. He doesnt need support his argument, he lets the viewer do that for him and creates a feedback loop where the viewer is both generating meaning into the vague claims and then agreeing with themselves.

So when you say this, what do you actually mean? Since youre a hardcore conservative Im assuming you mean shit like gas prices are high or you dont like that tax dollars help poor people

As an artist, that was horrible

To properly convey that sentiment...you should be saying "Water puts out some fires, but it makes others worse."

That is a more complete way of expressing it.

Water puts out fires.

So make a game.