Lurker > Zonbei

Shoot_FTH posted...

The best was the cougar, she's got a fantastic body. I don't know what lp is.

Oh I see, youre making all this up. That explains why you made the topic instead of quietly having a normal social life and sleeping with people like the rest of us.

itachi15243 posted...

I really don't mean to be mean by saying this, but you're trying a bit hard

You don't need to make up for all that time asap dude.

Nah this isnt even that many people. The only thing thats trying a bit hard is making a topic about it.

IfGodCouldDie posted...

And at the end when he controls the ants due to being Antman, how do you explain that?

Thats not he doesnt do that because hes Antman. Thats not. how titles work

Pastryarchy posted...

For a couple playthroughs, sure. Other than that, it's short lived. The ties to Chrono Trigger are minimal at best. The game has multiple endings via play conditions, but that doesn't mean the average gamer will be able to stand several playthroughs to do it. Just Youtube the ones you miss lmao...

If a game is good for a COUPLE PLAYTHROUGHS thats pretty good.

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Have you not seen Quantumania? Hank Pym is still very clearly Antman.

The movie is called Ant-Man and the Wasp. Its about Scott Lang, Ant-Man, and Wasp, Hope Van Dyne. They are the title character. Hank Pym is not very clearly Antman, as he is in fact not called Antman. I did see the movie.

VampireCoyote posted...

hey dont edit a post and then make it a new post, thats just rude

and if the smaller bully lifts the big bully up and slams him down on the ground then obviously Im gonna be concerned because holy shit

How the fuck did the smaller person in this hypothetical become a bully here in your reply? Are you okay?

VeggetaX posted...

CC is not simple and it's convoluted as fuck. Its plot is a huge shit storm. FF7 is direct and tells you everything and isn't about time and dimensional traveling.

Oh so its convoluted because its about time and dimension traveling and it doesnt matter I just easily explained the plot in simple terms? Interesting.

CC also tells you everything. In a way thats less well done (infodump) but easier to parse than FF7 does. I still dont fully understand the cloud/Zack fuckery, although thats partially because I dont care.

TheWizardOfOrz posted...

That's because ff7 has a very simple surface interpretation; a bunch of cool eco terrorists fightinf an evil corporation run into a crazy samurai guy who wants to blow up the earth with a meteor because ??? ultimate power and then they all stab him so he doesn't....more or less.

Where's the basic plot of Chrono Cross is..I'm not entirely sure.

Serge gets sucked into a parallel world where he died as a kid. Mystery ensues. Its even simpler than FF7 at base.

If you want to delve in one more layer, ||serge gets caught up in a conflict between a computer from the future and dinosaurs from the past, all part of a plot by an old guy to save a girls life and kill the thing from CT once and for all.|| again still about as simple as FF7.

trappedunderice posted...

That guy is either permanently disabled or dead, you can see blood on the floor that looks like it came out of his ear.

Not clear why you think its his ear when nose or mouth makes more sense. Mans got thrown on the ground facedown.

Kamil posted...

I'd never play it so I read the story and it's parallel worlds and it gets so fucking confusing. I am saying this without spoiler tags. The music is phenomal and the music in Radical Dreamers is too.

But sometimes they just try too hard with this time travel/alternate dimension shit. And I thought Steins;Gate sometimes could be hard to follow it started here!!

Its honestly not that complicated. The same people who call it convoluted love FF7, which is wild.

LordFarquad1312 posted...

Not getting into spoilers in a topic asking if it's worth it. But it did. And it's shit.

Thats not how sequels work. CT remains the exact same game with the exact same story. If you didnt like the developments in CC you can just ignore them.

BoyOfBattle posted...

ok so obviously everyone posting itt played CC as a kid and have nostalgia glasses on. i do the same when heaping praise on FFT suiko 2 etc

as someone who played CT but not CC, does CC hold up at all? or is it one of em games that didnt age well but we all love anyway like xenogears

ive played it recently, and its great. and my partner who had never played it and barely played games at all as a kid played it and enjoyed it greatly. She did play CT first (her first RPG ever.)

LordFarquad1312 posted...

I literally can't remember anything about it other than how it made Trigger worse by association. Any game that does that is a piece of shit.

It didnt make Trigger worse, thats silly.

hexa posted...

It is turn-based with 3 characters at a time. With combo attacks between the characters. So, yes, it is like Chrono Trigger.

There are barely any combo attacks. It is turn based and has three characters. You can see enemies on the field before combat, rather than random encounters. Aside from that, its almost nothing like Chrono Trigger at all. The battle system is really wildly different.

lilORANG posted...

It's $13 right now. Worth it?

It is absolutely worth 13 dollars. It has flaws, mainly the lack of depth for many characters and a somewhat rushed and confusing ending. But the journey is worth it, and its just a beautiful game.

IfGodCouldDie posted...

When your point is to call out an article for being wrong it is relevant because Hank Pym is an Antman.

Ive already explicitly explained why it in fact wasnt relevant. Youre confused.

I like Last Jedi and basically dont like any of the other ones. (Except Rogue One.) Which shape is that

bioshockjack posted...

Is no one going to comment on this? What is this? Is this an A.I generated Gamefaqs post?

Yeah both their posts were gibberish. It almost seems like its not AI, but the poster is just hitting the next suggested word on their autosuggest thing on mobile.

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Hank Pym was still the original Antman in the MCU though.

i do not care, its irrelevant to the point

IfGodCouldDie posted...

Hank Pym being Antman is irrelevant to Hank Pym not being Antman?

Its irrelevant to the topic at hand, which is about the MCU, and how some characters arent the best. Like Scott Lang. Who is Antman.

a-c-a-b posted...

Nah.

I'm not eager to die but I don't care either.

I'm just gonna keep doing my thing until the day I don't wake up.

Not going to the doctor when you vomit up black tarlike shit is being eager to die.

a-c-a-b posted...

Why can't you just be happy for me?

All my snark inside, I hope you have a good time! Everyone deserves to have a nice time with people they like.

IfGodCouldDie posted...

He is the original Antman in the MCU

Thats true! Its also wildly irrelevant.

I4NRulez posted...

do people on CE not get invited to parties enough that this deserves a topic lol

Thats what I was sayin lol. Sometimes I feel like the only person on this website with an active social life.

a-c-a-b posted...

Not sure. I never went to the doctor.

My stomach kinda hurts at times but it's not too painful so I mostly just ignore it and keep doing my thing.

My guy the black shit was blood. You have an ulcer or something worse. Although ulcers can kill you as well. Go to the doctor.

SHRlKE posted...

Take it elsewhere gents. This isnt the place.

I feel like this is exactly the place for discussing how he could have died suddenly at age 60?

Im also going to a party tonight but I didnt feel the need to make a topic about it. Is this a big event?

Supersex420 posted...

Sorry lol, I wish I was smarter and a better person

Well, you know. Ill at least give you credit for not being a total dick about being wrong. Most people would react differently.

Supersex420 posted...

lol whatever you say. But if someone needs time travel invented tomorrow you need MCU

This proves the point that exactly two geniuses exist in the MCU, yes, but not much else.

(not saying only two exist, but your point is about the two that made time travel.)

ellis123 posted...

https://screenrant.com/mcu-hank-pym-smartest-character-not-shuri-confirmed/

Hank Pym isnt Antman in the MCU, my guy.

Ivynn posted...

People don't really drop dead at 60 anymore. Barring outside forces or a really unhealthy lifestyle, it's expected most people will make it to at least 80.

That isnt remotely true. Again, median life expectancy for men is 70. People drop dead at 60 all the time. You dont have to have a really unhealthy lifestyle to have a stroke.

Supersex420 posted...

Yeah, I mean the mentally ill character not being exceptional is a separate issue but I know I'm not right. It's just how I feel about the MCU

Many people arent exceptional in the MCU! Bruh.

Supersex420 posted...

I'm pretty sure Ant Man is a genius

Ms Marvel, sure ok

Spiderman is a genius

Guardians... Sure, probably

And I guess She Hulk showed more regular people as super heroes now

Ant man isnt a genius. Like at all. Peter hasnt really been showed to be that much of a genius. Very smart, sure. Remember, were talking about the movies.

Supersex420 posted...

Moon Knight is actually one of the better examples of them not doing this, but again I don't know much about the character. He probably even has a good as job that most mentally ill people just don't normal have.

Idk, I think media just can't do mental illness well and they usually use it for story reasons rather than just having a character that is actually that way. My point is their overall QoL is not depicted as bad, when it usually is. These are just facts of being mentally ill...

I havent watched the show but Im just going to say a bunch of stupid shit.

He works in a museum shop. Many people with mental illness have good, stable jobs. Moon Knights QOL isnt actually depicted as that great though. You have zero idea what youre talking about it in literally any area right now.

Supersex420 posted...

All sorts of media does this. If a character does something they are the best or pretty much the best or whatever.

I just think it makes us set our expectations of stuff too high. Like for me it feels like if something isn't "super" it's not worth it. That leaves no time for stuff made by people of a lower skill level, etc.

This is remarkably untrue of the MCU. I have no clue where youre getting this from. I mean, ant-man is right the fuck there. Hes not the best at anything. He was literally chosen to be expendable. Thats just one of many examples. Ms Marvel. Spiderman. Star-Lord and basically the entire Guardians.

Supersex420 posted...

Are there scenes where he panics and dissasociates and then is perfectly fine like a day later?

You are very, very confused.

Supersex420 posted...

Moon Knight is physically fit despite supposed debilitating mental health issues (which probably aren'teven relevant to the plot that much, I haven't seen it). Dude should barely be able to feed himself and yet he probably has the full ability of a healthy person

Why should he barely be able to feed himself? He has DID, not whatever would cause you to not be able to feed yourself. You havent seen it, so youve got no idea what youre talking about. Hes physically fit because hes a mercenary and at least one of his alters is probably working out all the time.

Supersex420 posted...

Ok, sorry, a million apologies. Do you know what I mean now, though?

I understand what you mean now, but its still.. wrong. It basically only applies to Tony. And maybe Doctor Strange.

Supersex420 posted...

I mean I don't think a perfect person would have zero emotional issues. Being perfect would cause more issues than it solves.

That said, I still don't like that it normalizes this level of accomplishment. Just on virtue of how pervasive this media is.

Do you understand what the word perfect means? Also Tony is like.. the only one at that level of accomplishment. See my previous edit about moon knight and shang chi, along with the existence of Peter Parker and basically every single other person who isnt Tony.