Lurker > DifferentialEquation

There was one brand of laundry pods I remember using that smelled like sweet tarts. I still never had the desire to put them in my mouth.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

He created the first treebeard.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

OldSnakeLiveon8 posted...

Yo did someone just say the religious right doesn't hate gay people lol. Boy what planet you been living on the last 100 years?

Most do not hate gay people. I'm an atheist, but in my experience, most Christians have the attitude that they're going to treat everyone (including gay people) with love and kindness because it's not their place to judge anyone, only God can do that.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

People change their positions and become more wise with age.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Good.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

being faithful to your significant other, being good to your neighbors, helping out the less fortunate (including stray cats)
---

There's no business to be taxed.

It's no big secret that Obama has a talent for crocodile tears.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

In what specific ways do you want background checks to be made stricter?
---

There's no business to be taxed.

GigaSPX posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

Republicans didn't like Obama because of the ACA. They wouldn't have given a shit about what he did in his private life.

Fox News ripped the shit off him the time he wore a tan colored suit.

Famous people have their fashion choices critiqued all the time. There are people that make entire careers of doing that.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

When I get home from work I'll have some lasagna and play Clash of the Monsters which is free on XB1 one right now.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Republicans didn't like Obama because of the ACA. They wouldn't have given a shit about what he did in his private life.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Barenziah Boy Toy posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

Nobody is upset about the movie doing well. People are annoyed because anyone who doesn't think the the movie is a flawless masterpiece is being labeled a racist.

Huh?

Every hero movie has had some complaints about plot, pacing, character development, changes from the source material, etc. These are all the usual things that pretty much every movie gets criticized for to some degree. But the left basically wants any such complaints about Black Panther to be regarded as hate speech.

What's that? You liked Spiderman Homecoming more? Better not post that opinion social media unless you feel like like getting doxed and having a bunch of SJWs calling up your employer and trying to get you fired.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Nobody is upset about the movie doing well. People are annoyed because anyone who doesn't think the the movie is a flawless masterpiece is being labeled a racist.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

She has no business acting this way. I'm guessing she wouldn't like it if you kept bugging her for sex when she didn't feel like it. What she's doing is just as bad.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

prettyprincess posted...

because it's weird to consider your attractions through that lens at all

Why is it strange? Plenty of people have similar preferences for hair color and I don't hear anyone complain about that.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

FLUFFYGERM posted...

no but watch it anyway

it's free on Amazon if you have Prime

But I'm neither an SJW nor an alt-righter. Should I still watch it?
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Does it have anything to do with Crash Bandicoot?
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Gamecube is my favorite console of all time.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

*random white guy who works an entry level job somewhere makes a racist joke on facebook
liberals: "Let's dox him and get him fired! This won't be tolerated!'

*black guy who hates white people and painted scenes of them being decapitated is hired to paint Obama's Smithsonian portrait
liberals: "What's the problem?"
---

There's no business to be taxed.

CaptainCrunch posted...

So after seeing it, all I can say is that it's just another marvel flick. Nothing amazing, just more hero biz.

Be careful, that's that kind of talk that will get you labeled a racist.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Solar_Crimson posted...

She also questioned the ship's management, quoting the captain as saying, "'What do you want me to do about it throw them overboard?'"

Sure. Why not?
---

There's no business to be taxed.

metralo posted...

s0nicfan posted...

Bringing up that deadpool was heralded AFTER IT CAME OUT due to how it performed just shows how disingenuous you're being. Find me a deadpool article that looks like this before it came out:
http://www.bbc.com/news/av/entertainment-arts-42996895/black-panther-why-this-film-is-a-moment

its a pretty big deal to black people. whats the problem with that? can't you ignore it?

There's nothing wrong with black people being excited to see a superhero movie with black characters.

However, that doesn't mean it somehow transcends into being something more than superhero movie. And that doesn't mean that people who saw the movie and had some complaints are racists.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Cosmic_Diabetic posted...

Why are people on CE coming after Black Panther SPECIFICALLY?

Why not go after Logan like this? Why not go after Deadpool like this? Why not go after most of the other Marvel movies that have comparable reviews to this?

I'm going to look into what stark difference this film has from the other ones that is pissing people off so much but I'm worried about what I'm going to find.....

Lots of people have differing opinions on super hero movies. I remember some people saying Logan was a disappointment. The difference is that people who criticized Logan weren't automatically called a neo nazi or a white supremacist.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

GregShmedley posted...

RickyTheBAWSE posted...

Pepys Monster posted...

RickyTheBAWSE posted...

what situation were you in that your AR-15 was needed to make you feel safe, TC?

It's the peace of mind that I have the means to defend my life against bad guys. I don't want to get into a knife fight. I don't want to beg a bad guy not to hurt me. If someone breaks into my home, they're getting two rounds into the chest and that's the last home they'll ever break into.

you can get that with a handgun and shotgun. it's not like you're combating an armed militia, and you're definitely not going to even attempt to overthrow a tyrannical government... so for home protection, an AR seems like a waste outside of cool points.

The AR is perfect for home defense. Less recoil and lighter than a shotgun along with a higher round count and you get the benefit of aiming down the sights versus the shorter sight radius of a handgun. I

It is not a waste nor for cool points.

Also, the things that you mentioned, which would very important for a firearm in a home defense scenario where you might have to face more than one armed attacker, are not really going to make any difference in a school a shooting situation where someone has essentially free reign to gun down unarmed targets until the cops/SWAT arrive. There's no logical reason to be against the AR-15 specifically.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

CrimsonRage posted...

Turtlebread posted...

GregShmedley posted...

Turtlebread posted...

Safe from other people with guns

that's the gun cycle

Or knives. Or blunt objects. Or in numbers.

Not everyone who could harm you in a break in is automatically armed with a gun.

but would you rather have a gun vs gun battle or a knife vs knife fight
personally I think the latter is cooler

and more survivable

that's what anti-gun control peeps aren't getting

it's not about stopping it completely (that's impossible). it's about limiting the destruction.

More survivable for who? Do you think, for example, that a woman or an elderly person will have much of chance in a knife fight against the average man? Do you think they might fare better with a gun?
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Same. However, one time when I got home from work I caught I bunch of rounds loading themselves into a magazine. The magazine was then planning to then load itself into the firearm and start firing randomly. I was able to stop it in time, but I do understand the point that liberals are trying to make.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Guy_Fieri posted...

It's not surprising though

They gave Phasma a novel AND a mini comic series

I haven't read them, but Phasma seems to have the potential for some interesting stories. Rose doesn't.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

maybe it's just an average movie
---

There's no business to be taxed.

billcom6 posted...

Not to mention LeBron is a better person than Trump in literally every way you can imagine.

That's not true. LeBron has not built one of the greatest real estate empires in our country's history. Trump did.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Pics of cat
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Paper_Okami posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

Calling our men and women in uniform garbage human beings like Kaepernick did is not a criticism.

good thing that's not what he did.

Yes he was. There is no particular law or policy that he wanted to see changed. He was simply accusing our police, soldiers and firefighters of being evil racists who want to hurt black people.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Paper_Okami posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

E32005 posted...

The Admiral posted...

So now you're admitting Kapernick's kneeling is a criticism of the military?

he said after the first time kneeled it had nothing to do with the military.

It was a leftist dog whistle. We all knew what he really meant when he was kneeling.

proof?

and even if it was? Are the military exempt from criticism?

Saying that you think the military budget is way too high is a criticism of the military.

Calling our men and women in uniform garbage human beings like Kaepernick did is not a criticism.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

E32005 posted...

The Admiral posted...

So now you're admitting Kapernick's kneeling is a criticism of the military?

he said after the first time kneeled it had nothing to do with the military.

It was a leftist dog whistle. We all knew what he really meant when he was kneeling.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

The American flag is a galactic symbol of freedom and truth. It transcend politics.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Giant_Aspirin posted...

but according to Agent Orange there was no interference

According to your Messiah Obama, Romney was a buffoon when said we should worry about Russia.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Iodine posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

No. Why would I feel bad for someone who is attractive, famous, had a successful modeling career and is also happily married to very wealthy, influential and good looking guy?

I know this is your shtick but come on now.

So let me repeat what I posted earlier: Why is it that several of you mocked me for saying that Trump is a good looking guy but not one of you mocked me when I said Melania is attractive? You're just showing how ridiculously biased you are against Trump.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

AdviceMan posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

AdviceMan posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Well because one guy tried to murder another man who happened to be armed and shot him in self-defense. The criminal then sadly died from the wound.

Was Trayon trying to murder him? I'm not arguing with whether or not Trayvon attacked him, but there's a difference between wanting to kick someone's ass and wanting to murder them.

Wat an odd DifferentialEquation post.

What's odd about this? If I'm wrong then give me link/source, but I don't recall any evidence suggesting that Trayvon's intent was to murder Zimmerman.

No it's odd because you took that position. Usually you say the most inflammatory thing possible in every discussion.

You probably have me confused with someone else.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

AdviceMan posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

UnfairRepresent posted...

Well because one guy tried to murder another man who happened to be armed and shot him in self-defense. The criminal then sadly died from the wound.

Was Trayon trying to murder him? I'm not arguing with whether or not Trayvon attacked him, but there's a difference between wanting to kick someone's ass and wanting to murder them.

Wat an odd DifferentialEquation post.

What's odd about this? If I'm wrong then give me link/source, but I don't recall any evidence suggesting that Trayvon's intent was to murder Zimmerman.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Questionmarktarius posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

but I call Trump good looking and you act like it's completely ridiculous

Were this thirty or forty years ago, instead of 2018...
http://s.newsweek.com/sites/www.newsweek.com/files/styles/lg/public/2015/07/27/trump.jpg

His hair is little bit lighter in color, and he has a few wrinkles as everyone tends to get when they age, but he's still good looking.

Look at Vanna White. She's 60 and still looks great. And there'd be a lot of angry Wheel of Fortune viewers if they tried to replace her with someone younger.

Getting older doesn't all of a sudden mean that person is no longer good looking.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

UnfairRepresent posted...

Well because one guy tried to murder another man who happened to be armed and shot him in self-defense. The criminal then sadly died from the wound.

Was Trayon trying to murder him? I'm not arguing with whether or not Trayvon attacked him, but there's a difference between wanting to kick someone's ass and wanting to murder them.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Questionmarktarius posted...

So, single-action revolvers, pump-action shotguns, and bolt-action rifles are all entirely useless for home defense?

Obviously they're not entirely useless. But in the event of having multiple armed intruders, a semi-auto will give you a much better chance.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

Lol, you guys have such a ridiculous hate boner for Trump. I call Melania attractive and you don't question it, but I call Trump good looking and you act like it's completely ridiculous.
---

There's no business to be taxed.

No. Why would I feel bad for someone who is attractive, famous, had a successful modeling career and is also happily married to very wealthy, influential and good looking guy?
---

There's no business to be taxed.

MuayThai85 posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

MuayThai85 posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

I support this policy. I haven't heard any mainstream politicians support it. So far there's just a lot of namecalling going on, like people claiming Marco Rubio doesn't care about dead kids because he said we need to wait before jumping to conclusions or something.

Some people are already calling for an assault weapons ban, while others are talking about mandatory background checks and mental health. It remains to be seen what strategy the Democrats are going to try to take on this.

Honestly, if you want to own an AR, pistol or have a concealed carry permit (even open carry) you should be required to pass a psych evaluation. Bypass the evaluation for the standard background check for long guns, shotguns, etc.

The AR-15 is a long gun. And if you wanted to make an AR-15 the exception for requiring a psych evaluation, there's really no point. Particularly in a situation where someone would be shooting unarmed targets until the police arrive, an AR-15 is no more or less deadly than a lot of other rifles. If somehow, AR-15s magically become extremely difficult to obtain, then shooters would just use something else like a mini 14.

By long gun, I mean bolt action types. Typical hunting rifles and shit. Should have been more clear.

So it sounds like you want a psych evaluation for anything semi-auto?
---

There's no business to be taxed.

MuayThai85 posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

I support this policy. I haven't heard any mainstream politicians support it. So far there's just a lot of namecalling going on, like people claiming Marco Rubio doesn't care about dead kids because he said we need to wait before jumping to conclusions or something.

Some people are already calling for an assault weapons ban, while others are talking about mandatory background checks and mental health. It remains to be seen what strategy the Democrats are going to try to take on this.

Honestly, if you want to own an AR, pistol or have a concealed carry permit (even open carry) you should be required to pass a psych evaluation. Bypass the evaluation for the standard background check for long guns, shotguns, etc.

The AR-15 is a long gun. And if you wanted to make an AR-15 the exception for requiring a psych evaluation, there's really no point. Particularly in a situation where someone would be shooting unarmed targets until the police arrive, an AR-15 is no more or less deadly than a lot of other rifles. If somehow, AR-15s magically become extremely difficult to obtain, then shooters would just use something else like a mini 14.
---

There's no business to be taxed.