Lurker > Sativa_Rose

ThyCorndog posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

UnholyMudcrab posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

Greece, but Greece has had a lot of problems going back a long time. I blame the Ottomans.

Started even before then. Enrico fucking Dandolo and the rest of his stupid Catholic posse can stick their fancy hats up their asses and "crusade" their way back to Venice with their heads on spikes where they belong

1204 worst year of my life

I'm too noob to know this shit yet, gotta get my history level up

yeah venice sacked constantinople. there's a good chance that if catholic crusaders didn't keep sacking byzantium, the ottomans might have never took it over

Makes sense, the Europeans needed to provide a more united front against the Ottomans and other eastern powers
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

electricbugs2 posted...

Serbia.

They really need to stop trying to bully other former Yugoslav Republics and mind their own fucking business. Boo hoo Croatia is a tourist attraction and Kosovo wants to be independent. Just be happy with what you've got.

lol what are they trying to do to Croatia?
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

UnholyMudcrab posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

Greece, but Greece has had a lot of problems going back a long time. I blame the Ottomans.

Started even before then. Enrico fucking Dandolo and the rest of his stupid Catholic posse can stick their fancy hats up their asses and "crusade" their way back to Venice with their heads on spikes where they belong

1204 worst year of my life

I'm too noob to know this shit yet, gotta get my history level up
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Garioshi posted...

France has been in a constant nosedive since 1812, but Serbia can't stop sucking at everything it does, either. Tough choice.

If only Napoleon had just not invaded Russia and held onto his gains... -___-
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

I support this policy. I haven't heard any mainstream politicians support it. So far there's just a lot of namecalling going on, like people claiming Marco Rubio doesn't care about dead kids because he said we need to wait before jumping to conclusions or something.

Some people are already calling for an assault weapons ban, while others are talking about mandatory background checks and mental health. It remains to be seen what strategy the Democrats are going to try to take on this.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Lorenzo_2003 posted...

7. The Dogs of War mercenary movie

I want to see this movie lol, that's the one with Christopher Walken right?
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Greece, but Greece has had a lot of problems going back a long time. I blame the Ottomans.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Also it was hilarious how cops in GTA: SA would get out of their cars and shoot anyone who crashed into them. I guess Rockstar was trying to make them as much like American cops as possible. Lol.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

It would lead to some funny situations lol.

Once I just stood by the side and saw a guy rear-end a cop car. The cop gets out to shoot him, but then other cars plow into them and start piling up and the cop car ends up getting flipped over, explodes, and causes nearby cars to explode, before you know it it's a graveyard of burning cars and bodies.

I didn't even do anything to cause it. I was just standing there watching. Lol.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

scar the 1 posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

scar the 1 posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

scar the 1 posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

well if y(x) = e^x

y'(x) = e^x

What if y is Ce^x?

y'(x) = e^x is what I am guessing, but I didn't look it up.

I was trying to get you to think about it, not trying to one-up you.

Oh okay, I didn't think you were trying to one-up me, but is that right?

Sorry again I'm dumb. I edited my post explaining. If we set C=1 we get e^x.

Ah okay. I just checked and yeah it should be Ce^x.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

scar the 1 posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

scar the 1 posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

well if y(x) = e^x

y'(x) = e^x

What if y is Ce^x?

y'(x) = e^x is what I am guessing, but I didn't look it up.

I was trying to get you to think about it, not trying to one-up you.

Oh okay, I didn't think you were trying to one-up me, but is that right?
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Singapore, it's an international finance center with a large multinational or 'expat' population. HK is kind of like this too but I think that Beijing has been gradually extending its influence over it since 1997. Singapore has some bullshit laws but probably is/will be more of a free country in the long run.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

scar the 1 posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

well if y(x) = e^x

y'(x) = e^x

What if y is Ce^x?

y'(x) = e^x is what I am guessing, but I didn't look it up.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

cjsdowg posted...

By the way here is him complaining about the 12 Years a slave.

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/424194735767433216?lang=en

He said Get Out was well made but racist, he said Moonlight was one of the worst Best Picture winners .

Maybe there is a pattern here.

Actually that's him complaining about the critics, not the movie.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

well if y(x) = e^x

y'(x) = e^x
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

I feel like there isn't enough info here but idk, I'm more of a computer science guy than a math guy
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

so if I'm thinking about this right, y is both a variable and the name of a function?
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Wendo Kolosoy because I am listening to him right now (a famous Congolese musician)
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

masticatingman posted...

l0bcity posted...

My brother had a good gpa in highschool never had a record and failed a piss test. Hes never allowed to try to join the military ever again. He shouldnt of smoked weed but its stupid he wasnt allowed in. This was back in 2011.

Yeah, this is actually what I thought the topic would be on, considering how common that is now. But obesity makes sense. Even among the non obese, there are some physical tests that might prove too much for some.

They let people in with possession charges usually according to what I read, they just don't want you failing the first piss test.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

l0bcity posted...

My brother had a good gpa in highschool never had a record and failed a piss test. Hes never allowed to try to join the military ever again. He shouldnt of smoked weed but its stupid he wasnt allowed in. This was back in 2011.

Yeah I've heard that if you fail the first piss test when you go to sign up then you get banned lol. They are still stuck in the stupid federal drug policy even though tons of people in the military get drunk all the time.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

southcoast09 posted...

Yeah, because the vast majority has been diagnosed with some 21st century disorder. They wont take a guy who has been hospitalized for being suicidal, but they will take a transgender with astronomically high chance of suicide.

Real smart.

It seemed like they focused more on obesity but they did mention mental illness. I wouldn't be surprised if they ease up on that, but the military already has a suicide problem so that suicide thing is something they might continue to be strict on.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

008Zulu posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

the failing US education system is leaving a lot of people without high school diplomas or the ability to score high enough on the ASVAB test

Aren't the educational standards already super low? I remember reading a few years back that standards had to be lowered, because too many applicants were failing.

It shows how bad the situation has gotten. My high school had something like a 25% dropout rate.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

https://tinyurl.com/ybyyxuzq

This article may explain why they are dropping standards... over 70% of Americans 17-24 are ineligible to serve. The biggest reason? Obesity.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

https://tinyurl.com/ybyyxuzq

According to the former commander of the U.S. Army Recruiting Command,Major General Allen Batschelet, the biggest culprit keeping young adults from qualifying to serve in the United States military however is health concerns, mostly obesity.

In 2015, he stated: The obesity issue is the most troubling because the trend is going in the wrong direction. By 2020 it could be as high as 50%, which means only 2 in 10 would qualify to join the Army.

Obesity is the biggest problem. Also, the failing US education system is leaving a lot of people without high school diplomas or the ability to score high enough on the ASVAB test to even qualify for the military.

There have always been people who don't qualify for health reasons, criminal background, low education, etc., but the number has been going way up compared to previous generations.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

idk why some people here think they are qualified to talk about whether or not people need to throw handgrenades... real life isn't like call of duty, no one cares about what prestige level you're on
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

RECON64bit posted...

My mind is blown. Where was he during lord of the rings? He had to complain about a movie because it featured black people?

LOTR was way too long ago. He complained about the female Ghostbusters movie though I bet.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

I'll go with the LotR trilogy, don't just wanna pick 1
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

If they do decide to use the death penalty, it means this will be dragged out for years and years, possibly decades.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Cj_WlLL_VVlN posted...

That's 60-75 feet? That's less than 2nd base to first base. What the fuck is wrong? Are they hiring handicapped people now?

It might honestly be because of the females. My little bro said a lot of the females failed the grenade throw. He said that there were like 30 females out of some 200 - 250 people in his troop or whatever and only like 5-6 of them actually made it all the way through the training. This was to be a Cavalry Scout (19D)
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

MrK3V posted...

It's not the compassion part. It's not doing something about it.

The people doing the mocking are rarely giving their own policy proposals. "Gun control" can mean a million different things.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

lol what jealous noobs
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Swagnificent119 posted...

The gun didn't change, we changed.

I was with him until he brought up video games that give you points for raping and killing people (apparently those exist?)
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

AlecSkorpio posted...

Man, the more I sit and think about it, just fucking ban them.

IIRC AR15's aren't even selling anymore. It'd do nothing but what the fuck do I care I got mine.

Doesn't that mean banning all semi-automatic rifles of that caliber and up?
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Axiom posted...

The officers undoubtedly did which is why I said all it takes is for higher ups looking the other way. Given his habit of lying and attitude towards Iraqis it's easy to assume he might have killed someone before confirming whether they were threats or not

It wouldn't be that shocking, but it's all speculative when it comes to Chris Kyle personally so we can't say either way. One thing I'll give you is that the military does tend to sweep things under the rug rather than risk the public backlash, both US public backlash and from the local areas. So they've swept a lot of things under the rug, it's not surprising at this point. All governments do this. This is why we need strong investigative journalists to go out and publicize the truth.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Axiom posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

Axiom posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

Axiom posted...

He described all Iraqis as savages and the enemy which means which means viewed everyone as the enemy and held no compunction about killing someone that he himself believed was the enemy IE all Iraqis. He's a proven liar and there's really no telling how many innocent people he killed simply because in his mind they are the enemy

It's not like his opinion gave him a free pass to kill anyone he wanted. I'm not an expert on the military or anything, but I am pretty sure he still would have gotten in huge trouble if he was just sniping off civilians for no reason.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-kill-team-20110327

I'm not surprised the Pentagon did everything it could to keep the story/photos from coming out, as this kind of stuff would quickly be taken up by the enemy for propaganda purposes, and it would further endanger the lives of our people in Afghanistan.

It's worth noting the people in this story ended up being charged with murder, as should happen.

After the killing, the soldiers involved in Mudin's death were not disciplined or punished in any way. Emboldened, the platoon went on a shooting spree over the next four months that claimed the lives of at least three more innocent civilians. When the killings finally became public last summer, the Army moved aggressively to frame the incidents as the work of a "rogue unit" operating completely on its own, without the knowledge of its superiors. Military prosecutors swiftly charged five low-ranking soldiers with murder, and the Pentagon clamped down on any information about the killings. Soldiers in Bravo Company were barred from giving interviews, and lawyers for the accused say their clients faced harsh treatment if they spoke to the press, including solitary confinement. No officers were charged.

They were only charged after it became public knowledge and even then none of the officers in charge of it got charged

Did the military know the additional killings were murders though before that point?
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

D-Lo_BrownTown posted...

I dunno, though. I feel like most soldiers would probably be viewed as human garbage at heart if they said what they really feel, and he didn't give no fucks about it. I'm torn because I really doubt his views were views that were not held by many people in combat situations. So it's like if he's garbage they're all garbage, but I don't think they're all garbage so he must not be garbage just a tool?

I don't mean to be stereotypical, but it might be worth pointing out that Chris Kyle had a very rural upbringing. He grew up on a cattle ranch in rural Texas. Again, not trying to be stereotypical, but I am not shocked to hear that someone with that background was talking shit about Iraqis/Afghans
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

r4X0r posted...

2015 seems to be the latest year available, and there were 9,616 total gun homicides. 6,447 were committed with handguns and 252 were committed with rifles. That comes out to 0.0390879478827362. I call .039 close as makes no difference to 4%. So that checks out. Almost.

I said almost for a reason. That's rifles of ALL TYPES and makes and models, not just AR-15s. That's everything from a .22 range plinker to a .50 BMG Barret to Grandpa's bolt action deer rifle. To really find the number of homicides the AR-15 is used in, you'd have to know what percentage of rifles are AR-15s, and that's not data that's actually available. I can't find anything concrete on rifle ownership specifically. So all we can safely say is "less than four percent." But take into account there's only about seven million AR-15s in the country, out of 300,000,000 total firearms.

Oh okay, that makes sense. So the number for AR-15s specifically is way less than 4% then.

There's probably some popular handgun model, a Glock or something, that is responsible for more deaths than any other type of gun, yet it's not getting any attention whatsoever in this current wave of those calling for gun control. At least on twitter, I've only seen "assault weapons" and AR-15s condemned.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Axiom posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

Axiom posted...

He described all Iraqis as savages and the enemy which means which means viewed everyone as the enemy and held no compunction about killing someone that he himself believed was the enemy IE all Iraqis. He's a proven liar and there's really no telling how many innocent people he killed simply because in his mind they are the enemy

It's not like his opinion gave him a free pass to kill anyone he wanted. I'm not an expert on the military or anything, but I am pretty sure he still would have gotten in huge trouble if he was just sniping off civilians for no reason.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-kill-team-20110327

I'm not surprised the Pentagon did everything it could to keep the story/photos from coming out, as this kind of stuff would quickly be taken up by the enemy for propaganda purposes, and it would further endanger the lives of our people in Afghanistan.

It's worth noting the people in this story ended up being charged with murder, as should happen.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Look at the date (or title) of that sailor moon vid, it's not from the Olympics
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Axiom posted...

He described all Iraqis as savages and the enemy which means which means viewed everyone as the enemy and held no compunction about killing someone that he himself believed was the enemy IE all Iraqis. He's a proven liar and there's really no telling how many innocent people he killed simply because in his mind they are the enemy

It's not like his opinion gave him a free pass to kill anyone he wanted. I'm not an expert on the military or anything, but I am pretty sure he still would have gotten in huge trouble if he was just sniping off civilians for no reason.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Dark_Spiret posted...

4%. thats the number of gun deaths the AR15 has on its hands per year. thats on par with other rifles and shotguns. handguns take up 80%. the AR15 is the most widely owned single type of rifle in the country. its in literally millions of citizens hands so yes unfortunately its going to show up in some bad ways. the AR15 is not that unique. there are dozens of similar types of weapons that are just as available and yet everyone wants to single out the AR as if getting rid of it will solve anything in anyway when you can just as easily move over to an FNH, PTR, AK, Mini14, HK ect.

this is the core problem with the gun control debate and why nothing happens. gun controllers act almost all on their emotions and try to pass laws on items and a system they know absolutely nothing about.

Is it actually 4%? I would have guessed much smaller. Where did that number come from?

But yeah you're right that one of the fundamental issues of the gun control movement is that it revolves around hysterical emotional reactions, usually to mass shootings, and it's not really a sound analysis of the issue. Even pro gun control types like Sam Harris have admitted this.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

He lied a lot in his book, as others have pointed out.

There are some in the media, like Michael Moore, who criticized him for being a sniper. Those people are complete idiots. That was his role in the military, but if you look at the military as a giant war machine, you need every cog functioning properly for stuff to work. Why is the sniper evil but the guy who drove the ammunition to the forward operating base or whatever so the sniper could use it gets a free pass? Doesn't work that way. Michael Moore is just a radical who shames soldiers for taking part in a war he disagreed with.

If you have a problem with the war, blame the politicians, not the soldiers.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

Lack of training and being conditioned to not act certain ways in crowds I think, but I don't really know how true this phenomenon is to begin with. I think a lot of times when something happens a lot of people are still trying to figure out what is going on
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

JustMyOpinion posted...

Joke article. Savings accounts pay like 1% a year. Real savings are in 401k or an index fund or bonds or etc.

Indeed, I think this is only informative if you look at people who have under a certain amount (not sure what that amount would be though, depends on individual circumstances). Beyond an emergency fund there's no reason to put a lot into a savings account and get even less interest than the risk free rate from treasury bonds.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

For some reason I thought it was already out. Have all these people really been getting trolled over a movie that's not even out yet?
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

wackyteen posted...

Sativa_Rose posted...

Oh my god lol

My little brother just went through Army basic training a couple months back. He told me that a lot of people failed the grenade throw and had to be recycled at that point.

I guess the Army decided too many people were failing, so they just removed the requirement. It was probably costing them big $$$.

in my basic they just gave everybody what basically amounted to a free GO on the toss <_<

wow it sounds like they were cheating then
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

fenderbender321 posted...

I know this is like an inside joke here or something, but is there a legit reason why a girl would want her ass to get eaten? I thought ass play only felt good for guys because that's where our G-spot is.

Also, is there a reason why the tongue should be used instead of a lubed up finger or like a feather or something?

I don't think the male g spot is the reason. I think that's too deep in the ass. I think it feels good because of the way it feels on the outside of the asshole, or maybe a little bit on the inside, but I've never had it done to me.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.

If you are against eating ass, you are a prude.
---

I may not go down in history, but I will go down on your sister.