Lurker > Nomadic View

r4X0r posted...

Alright, tell us what you think "fascism" means.

Fascism just means not a SJW apparently.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

These are some amazing hoops to jump through just to pretend to be offended.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

s0nicfan posted...

BLAKUboy posted...

Where's his token black "supporter"? They always sit one right behind him to act like he's not universally hated by blacks.

Looks like the racists are out in full force. Project harder.

Damn!
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Dr Doom

In an alternate reality Doom actually conquered the world and he created a utopia.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Its pretty decent. Its nothing to get too excited about though.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

JustMyOpinion posted...

Fair, next.

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Asherlee10 posted...

I guess Jimmy Buffet has some country songs, but I wouldn't classify him as a Country Music musician, though.

He's synonymous with beach tunes.

This. Although I cant really think of anyone else that fits the beach tunes category.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Offworlder1 posted...

I womder if some of the people who owned these flipped cars are also rioters.

I hope so.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The original Resident Evil.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Made silly tweets.

If he would just stay the fuck off Twitter, he would be as great a president as Reagan.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Fin_Dawg_004 posted...

4d racism

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

No questions, but I just wanted to tell you I appreciate your service. Most people have no idea the shit law enforcement has to deal with.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Im sure there will be some childish assholes that will refuse.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Incredibly sorry to hear that.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

cjsdowg posted...

The Admiral posted...

What was the lie about the black crime rate?

That 87% of white people were killed by place people.

Place people did nothing wrong!
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Im a Bengals fan. Yeah, Ill agree. I would love it if my team was that good. But Im so sick of seeing the Pats at every Super Bowl.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Its like theyre trying to lose the midterm elections.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Yeah, sometimes people say stupid shit.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Patriots
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Bullet_Wing posted...

The Admiral posted...

Nomadic View posted...

So does this mean that moving forward this is Trumps economy or is it Obamas when things bounce back?

Anything good is because of Obama, anything bad is because of Trump.

Conversely, when talking to Trump cultists, anything good is because of Trump, anything bad is because of Obama and the "Deep State"

Im perfectly content with saying all the good and the bad are reflective of the current president.

I doubt this is a downward trend, but rather a natural fluctuation of ups and downs in the stock market. Either way, Trump has blame or credit.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

So does this mean that moving forward this is Trumps economy or is it Obamas when things bounce back?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Toilet paper is built to dissolve.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I saw a guy die in church. He was telling the church some story about a guy that came to his house. He had a heart attack while he was telling the story. My assumption is he was so nervous about speaking in front of a crowd that he had a heart attack. He was an elderly man.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Dampproof posted...

I still find this all ironic coming from a nation created and built by illegal immigration.

It was conquered by invaders.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Killing L. The show was unwatchably boring after L died.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

K181 posted...

iClockwork posted...

Saquon--Barkley posted...

Tyson stated a simple fact. The woman created a false premise he didnt argue whether the immigrants were legal or not.

His underlying premise was that all types of immigrants are good.

Maybe. Or you're reading intent where he was just generally making a pro-immigration statement.

Questionmarktarius posted...

Merit-based immigration wouldn't change this at all.

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Eagles, but the Patriots are going to win.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

XXHornDogXX posted...

Honestly, I feel like millions of African America just quit their job after Trumps statement about black unemployment rate being at its lowest, purposely just so the unemployment rate rises so they can blame Trump again.

Wife: Hi, honey! How was work?

Husband: I quit!

Wife: WTF!? Why?!

Husband: Because it was making Trump look good!

Wife: We got bills to pay!

Husband: Youll thank me when Huffpo writes an article about this.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Kineth posted...

It's both, which is why it's not a net positive.

You have $20.
You bet $5 and lose.
You now have $15
You bet $10 an win
You now have $25

You lost some and you won some, but your net positive is $5. Do you understand what net positive means now?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Get a houseplant instead.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

shockthemonkey posted...

Funbazooka posted...

Keep grilling those nothingburgers when the cows come home to roost

What do you actually expect to happen?

I think the memo exposes some of the corruption, but I think youre right. Nothing substantial will come of it.

Sean Hannity will cling to it claiming this is the biggest scandal since Watergate.

Don Lemon will claim that its all lies, and its also racist for some reason.

In two weeks someone will say something that hurt someones feelings and the world will forget about it.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

No, but I remember green and purple ketchup.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

If they dont like it they can beg some other country to give them handouts. You do what your boss says or he stops paying you.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The eclipse is racist!
Not looking at someone is racist!
Yoga is racist!
Cashierless checkout is racist!
Now the word marijuana is racist!



Im loving it!
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Vultis_Zales posted...

Didn't the guy that played Aquaman also play someone from a Sci-fi show

I think hes Drogo from GoT.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I can name 44.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Yes, I do. Its self evident in the plain language. If they used other sources then there is no need to submit documents they know are false.

You have no idea how FISA warrants work. And you could have just said that in the beginning and saved all of us time.

My mistake. Please educate me.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

If it makes you feel better Ill answer it first.

No, law enforcement should not use material that they know is false, even in part, when they secure a warrant. Your turn.

Again, if youre scared of me or the question just tell me. Ok stop if you tell me to.

No one has ever been afraid of you.

Likewise no, law enforcement should not do that. And good thing the FBI has never claimed that the Steele Dossier was entirely false.

Thank you for finally answering.

I agree. I doubt the dossier is completely 100% false. Im sure Steele at least spelled his name correctly.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

UrCa1988 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

They used the dossier that they knew was false. Are you ok with that as a practice? Are you ok with law enforcement using material they know is false when they secure a warrant?

Show me where the FBI has come out and said the dossier was completely false. Because Comey openly testified under oath differently.

Still dodging.

Are you ok with law enforcement using material that they know is false when they secure a warrant?

If youre not going to answer it, just tell me, and Ill stop asking.

If 25% of the intel was false, 25% verifiably true, and 50% was unverified, should we act on the verifiable 25% or not?

If its verifiable then rely on whatever the verifiable sources are.

And until you see the FISA warrant entirely, you have zero proof that the FBI didn't do that.

Yes, I do. Its self evident in the plain language. If they used other sources then there is no need to submit documents they know are false.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Are you ok with law enforcement using material that they know is false when they secure a warrant?

This has nothing to do with what happened and you know it. Until you can prove that the FBI claimed the entire dossier is false, your semantic argument is pointless and entirely transparent.

If it makes you feel better Ill answer it first.

No, law enforcement should not use material that they know is false, even in part, when they secure a warrant. Your turn.

Again, if youre scared of me or the question just tell me. Ill stop if you tell me to.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

UrCa1988 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

They used the dossier that they knew was false. Are you ok with that as a practice? Are you ok with law enforcement using material they know is false when they secure a warrant?

Show me where the FBI has come out and said the dossier was completely false. Because Comey openly testified under oath differently.

Still dodging.

Are you ok with law enforcement using material that they know is false when they secure a warrant?

If youre not going to answer it, just tell me, and Ill stop asking.

If 25% of the intel was false, 25% verifiably true, and 50% was unverified, should we act on the verifiable 25% or not?

If its verifiable then rely on whatever the verifiable sources are.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

They used the dossier that they knew was false. Are you ok with that as a practice? Are you ok with law enforcement using material they know is false when they secure a warrant?

Show me where the FBI has come out and said the dossier was completely false. Because Comey openly testified under oath differently.

Still dodging.

Are you ok with law enforcement using material that they know is false when they secure a warrant?

If youre not going to answer it, just tell me, and Ill stop asking.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The Great Muta 22 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

You seriously think thats a good argument?

Are you ok with law enforcement submitting material that law enforcement knows is false when they apply for a warrant? Even in part? Do you think that is an acceptable practice?

Ill await your subsequent dodging of the question and deflection.

The dossier isn't completely false, nor do you have any proof of it being so. Again, the book Clinton Cash has been used in these situations, which is also full of inaccuracies. I'm not pretending to know what was entirely presented to the FISC for the warrant, but the implication in this that these were the only things used when the application process is 50-60 pages, and which multiple people have said that this memo isn't the entirety of the information, it's irresponsible to assume these were the only things used. And when Carter Page has had these issues since 2013 and four different directors from both political parties have signed off on it, I expect they had far more information than Nunes presented.

Youre completely dodging the question, just as I said you would.

I dont care if they used other material. They used the dossier that they knew was false. Are you ok with that as a practice? Are you ok with law enforcement using material they know is false when they secure a warrant?

After you deflect again Ill ask this question again. Save us both the time and just say that you will not answer that question.

If it makes you feel any better Ill answer it first. No, law enforcement should not use material, even in part, that they know is false when attempting to secure a warrant. Your turn.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Nagrand Cherry. I dont know how many years ago Burning Crusade was, but I still have those water breathing cherries in my bag.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Doctor Foxx posted...

Just lol if you think that American intelligence agencies were not looking into the campaign party members and actions of anyone in other parties running for election. This seems to be standard and beyond that a potentially helpful thing to look into.

No, I dont believe that previous administrations were doing that. Its a direct and blatant violation of the 4th Amendment.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The Great Muta 22 posted...

lilORANG posted...

LOL

so it's a summary of publicly available information?

From what I gather so far it alleges:

- Steele was biased against Trump
- The dossier was used in part to reauthorize the FISA warrant on Carter Page, someone who was under investigation since 2013
- The FBI/DOJ purposely left out the origins of the Steele dossier from the FISA court and that it could have changed the courts mind, which is something the FBI denies

And that's about it...

@The_Great_Muta_22

You seriously think thats a good argument?

Are you ok with law enforcement submitting material that law enforcement knows is false when they apply for a warrant? Even in part? Do you think that is an acceptable practice?

Ill await your subsequent dodging of the question and deflection.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Kim Kusanagi posted...

glitteringfairy posted...

Doom_Art posted...

* The Steele dossier formed an essential part of the initial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.

* Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.

* The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications.

* DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele's bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president.

This has literally been public knowledge for months lol

Doom_Art damage control begins!

Except that he's right. I don't see anything that was previously unknown.

Its not stuff that was previously known. Its confirmation of widespread speculation.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>