Lurker > Nomadic View

Depends if they act normal or act like a stereotype.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

spanky1 posted...

Did anyone else immediately think of Rose?

My first thought was the woman from Grays Anatomy.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Vultis_Zales posted...

Nomadic View posted...

UnholyMudcrab posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Any lawyer worth his weight in shit will take a list of questions, then fill them out and return it, not actually let Trump speak to Mueller by himself or even with a lawyer present.

And Mueller knows much better than to allow that to happen.

He doesnt have a choice. Trump has a 5th Amendment Constitutional right to not speak with him at all.

This may be true but come on it won't be hard to manipulate Trump into speaking with Muller

Absolutely. I think his lawyers would have a hard time convincing him not to talk to Mueller.

This is a cage held up with a stick on a rope with a neon sign saying THIS IS A TRAP. Trump is walking into it none the wiser.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

masticatingman posted...

Ive seen some good looking plus size models before but she doesnt even look attractive...

This exactly. I expected her to be large, but still pretty. This woman is fucking hideous.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

UnholyMudcrab posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Any lawyer worth his weight in shit will take a list of questions, then fill them out and return it, not actually let Trump speak to Mueller by himself or even with a lawyer present.

And Mueller knows much better than to allow that to happen.

He doesnt have a choice. Trump has a 5th Amendment Constitutional right to not speak with him at all.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Neoconkers posted...

Nomadic View posted...

If he talks to Mueller he will. Not because hes actually guilty of any collusion, but because its a perjury trap. Lying to an FBI agent, even without being under oath is a federal crime. Trump is a massive exaggerator, any one of us could get Trump to engage in puffery, and Mueller is a man that does that for a living.

Any lawyer worth his weight in shit will take a list of questions, then fill them out and return it, not actually let Trump speak to Mueller by himself or even with a lawyer present.

Trump WANTS to speak to Mueller, wants to prove hes smarter. Probably wouldnt listen to any lawyer telling him not to

I know. Its going to cost him. I dont think there is any merit to the collusion conspiracy, but all Mueller has to do is get Trump to lie to him about anything and hes got him. I think thats all this interview is for. And Trump is going to fall for it.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

If he talks to Mueller he will. Not because hes actually guilty of any collusion, but because its a perjury trap. Lying to an FBI agent, even without being under oath is a federal crime. Trump is a massive exaggerator, any one of us could get Trump to engage in puffery, and Mueller is a man that does that for a living.

Any lawyer worth his weight in shit will take a list of questions, then fill them out and return it, not actually let Trump speak to Mueller by himself or even with a lawyer present.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

McRib easy
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

$138k?!

And she hasnt shown up to work for a month? But she can show up as a fucking defendant twice?

Thats got to be some type of Michigan Bar ethics violation.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

lilORANG posted...

nah

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Yeah.

I couldnt get a hold of a girl for a couple of days, so I went out with someone else. Turns out she was in jail. But she was in jail for stalking her ex. She had the nerve to get pissed at me. lol
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Cookie Bag posted...

I've tried to get exalted with suramar on 2 characters now, but that zone quest-wise is so fucking boring and only a specific set of quests gives rep, i just got bored, gave up, didn't even run argus on LFR because the game just doesn't entertain me anymore... was thinking of coming back for BfA but i'm certain it's gonna be as bad as it has been for the past 2 expansions... ill just be content with reading up the lore and looking up the cutscenes because the game isn't worth playing to experience it...

After I got exalted with Suramar and finished the quest line I just quit WoW for a couple of months. It was such a grind and it burnt me out.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Suramar is a pain in the dick. But you have to do it to get flying which is damn near necessary.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Admiral gets a lot of shit, but rarely does anyone actually challenge the points he makes.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Can I still type GameFAQs.com and get here?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Waluigi7 posted...

I don't know why I am supposed to care since I am not a Disney employee.

I still have not seen any of this money.

Its economics. When being considered as a national aggregate, it creates wealth. You personally are not any better off, but youre also not any worse off. As an aggregate were better off as a nation because we have more wealth.

I know the retort is that the money is being shifted around, so its really all the same. Thats not how wealth works in economics. The funds Disney gave were voluntary. They gave them because they believed it was in their best interest to do so. The recipients also believe its in their best interest to receive the funds. No one is worse off, everyone is better off. Wealth was created.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Mal_Fet posted...

Why do leftists get so mad when their fellow man gets more wealth if someone else gets wealth in a bigger margin?

It has more to do with this being liberals worst fear than anything else. Their worst fear is that Trump will be successful, which makes overtaking him politically more difficult. I still think that Republicans are going to lose seats this mid term election, history has shown that is usually the case. But I dont think its going to be as dramatic as Democrats need to push legislation over a veto.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Its a balancing act. There are no perfect candidates. You have to weigh the things you like with the things you dont.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

MysteryMan923 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

I heard that on the radio this morning. Theyre blaming Millennials for not having many kids.

Or you could let your kid play with an iPad instead of going to toys r us.

Thats what Im leaning towards. Kids dont play with toys, at least not to the degree that I did when I was a kid. iPads and video games reign supreme in childhood these days.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Newhopes posted...

We already know this.

Half the liberals on this board are bigoted and racist against whites yet they constantly get away with it not to mention the bigotry against anybody conservative.

This used to be true, and the moderation staff still leans left to put it lightly. However, Ive seen a lot of fuck white people topics and posts start to actually get deleted here recently.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

yoloyoloswagEMP posted...

Nomadic View posted...

I was stupid when I was younger. I didnt use a condom when I fucked random women. Looking back I cant believe I got lucky and didnt catch anything or get any of them pregnant. I was a firm believer in the pull out method. Present me still wants to kick past mes ass for playing Russian Roulette like that.

wait whats wrong with pulling out

Its better than just leaving it in, but it by no means is going to stop her from getting pregnant.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I heard that on the radio this morning. Theyre blaming Millennials for not having many kids.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I was stupid when I was younger. I didnt use a condom when I fucked random women. Looking back I cant believe I got lucky and didnt catch anything or get any of them pregnant. I was a firm believer in the pull out method. Present me still wants to kick past mes ass for playing Russian Roulette like that.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Tag
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

If you just want to be really casual about it. Streaming onto your living room TV while lounging on the couch, sure.

If you want to play to the best of your ability and be more accurate, then no.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

ThePrinceFish posted...

Nothing can quite touch Jeb! handing out tiny turtles for votes.

When calculated out with what he spent in his campaign and ads it equaled out to about $800 per vote. The most expensive finance to vote ratio in the history of our nation.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

The_Freecs posted...

she's 15... who da fuck cares. Tell her to get over it and focus on her studies.

Just because shes 15 doesnt mean shes not heartbroken. Some sisterly love is exactly what she needs right now.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Balrog0 posted...

I drink steel reserve, like my dad before me

You are the manliest of manly men.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Pretty sure shes just a troll account, but holy shit at the poll results!


---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Be a member for a year and follow the rules. Thats not a high standard at all. Id add the stipulation that someone should not have any upheld/accepted moderations for at least a year.

Youre enforcing the rules. You should know them and obey them.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Hexenherz posted...

It's a good thing they removed him from the investigation then when they discovered that, isn't it?

That is a correct move, however, everything that agent came in contact with is corrupted, and everything that was built on from that agents work is corrupted.

All the work that agent did would have to be scrapped, and all subsequent work that relied on that agents work will also need to be scrapped.

It doesnt mean that the facts that agent worked on are now off limits, but that all work that agent did will have to be redone by another agent.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

legendary_zell posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Antifar posted...

I mean, two FBI agents texting critical things about Trump doesn't seem like a big deal to me.

s0nicfan posted...

FBI members, looking to stop Trump from winning the presidency "by any means necessary" were literally keeping 'insurance policy' documents to leak to the press should they decide he needs to be stopped

Seems to me that if this were true, they would have done so.

You dont think that is a big deal? Someone has a clear bias and an agenda against a person, and that someone is investigating you, and that someone admitted to achieving his goal by any means necessary. You dont think thats a big deal?

First you need to show an actual attempt was made. You'd need to show they did anything more than talk. You'd need to show it had any sort of affect on the real world. Lots of people are biased in this world, do you really think investigators are typically neutral? The difference is that these people were especially careless and text messaging exists now.

You'd also need to show they had any influence on biasing the investigation previously since they are no longer working on the investigation. Their mere internal bias and presence on the team isn't enough to actually cause things to operate differently than they would have with an objectively neutral team.

Once you prove all of these things, then you might have a case for a somethingburger (which is just a burger I guess).

It is absolutely material to the investigation. Even if no actual wrongdoing is discovered it is still an unethical move to allow someone with open bias and hatred towards someone that is being investigated. Especially when the investigator stated that he is willing to engage in a witch hunt. Due process be damned.

I certainly wouldnt want to be investigated by someone that stated they would do anything necessary to get me. I cant imagine you would feel comfortable being investigated by such a person either.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Darkman124 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

Fruit of the poisonous tree.

so, if a member of a team is a criminal, the entire team is criminal?

good to know since multiple members of trump's team have plead guilty.

Everything that member compiled is not valid. And everything that any accomplice that worked on while knowing the criminal behavior is also subject to having any evidence they gathered being suppressed.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Antifar posted...

Nomadic View posted...

and that someone is investigating you,

But they were removed from the investigation months ago.

So? They still compiled work that the investigation continued to build on.

You still didnt answer my question. According to the conditional statement I laid out, are those conditions a big deal?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Darkman124 posted...

Nomadic View posted...

You dont think that is a big deal? Someone has a clear bias and an agenda against a person, and that someone is investigating you, and that someone admitted to achieving his goal by any means necessary. You dont think thats a big deal?

big enough to be fired

good thing he was fired

idk what else you want

well, i do, but youre not getting it

Fruit of the poisonous tree.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Antifar posted...

I mean, two FBI agents texting critical things about Trump doesn't seem like a big deal to me.

s0nicfan posted...

FBI members, looking to stop Trump from winning the presidency "by any means necessary" were literally keeping 'insurance policy' documents to leak to the press should they decide he needs to be stopped

Seems to me that if this were true, they would have done so.

You dont think that is a big deal? Someone has a clear bias and an agenda against a person, and that someone is investigating you, and that someone admitted to achieving his goal by any means necessary. You dont think thats a big deal?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Its not on CNN. They dont even know its happening. The ones that have heard about it in passing just attempt to hand wave it as a nothingburger.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

EverDownward posted...

California, huh? Dude's gonna get nothing more than a slap on the wrist

Thats optimistic. Theyll throw him a parade.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

I stopped drinking it when they started running SJW ads.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

People have action expectations of superhero movies. A group of people talking superhero politics can be had here. Who would pay for that?
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

A messiah will come.

Christians: That messiah came. It was Jesus.

Muslims: That messiah came. I was Muhammad.

Jews: The messiah has not come yet.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

No.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Probably 2-3 times a week.

Im not thrilled with PH, but I am thrilled with free food.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

A lot of banks do this. I think its a BS practice. You dont have much money so were going to fine you.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

They vote left.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

jumi posted...

Because that work full-time to make a living deserve an actual living wage.

Itll just inflate the currency. Giving people bigger numbers on their money doesnt fix their situation. Just look at Zimbabwe and their worthless one hundred trillion dollar bill.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/06/africa/zimbabwe-trillion-dollar-note/index.html
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Just posting so you cant delete the topic.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>

Supremacy Clause. Federal Law > State Law.
---

{}\\{}(o){}\\//{}//=\\{})){}(< \\//{}{{-{}//\\{}
{}xxxxxxxx{};;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;>