Lurker > DelianSK

Silver Bearings posted...

You should be the clock with the "Work Hard" and "Play Harder" on the hours like that one pic that floats around here every now and then. @strikedgently

---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

strikedgently posted...

MikeArmstrong posted...

Post #6 which you just deleted

I don't know who made the post.

MikeArmstrong posted...

strikedgently posted...

MikeArmstrong posted...

Post #6 which you just deleted

I don't know who made the post.

You said "fuck you goatfucker"

Mods can still punish you for deleted posts you know.

And your account is straight b7 with your main being purged and all.

And yet we are supposed to believe him when he says he isn't TadG30 or whatever it is.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

HIV/AIDS can last for 6 days on dried blood outside the human body.

So hypothetically i don't see why this couldn't happen. Someone pops a zit on their ass and it's blood and pus. They don't clean it well. Sit on the toilet and that blood and pus transfers to the seat. Someone else sits on it with an open wound there and they COULD get the disease. The odds are probably astronomically low but I feel like it COULD happen.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

emblem boy posted...

DelianSK posted...

Yet the fact that people keep saying "but the bathroom, why did the mention the bathroom" means that the point is being missed.

What's the point?

The point is a girl was molested/raped. Instead of focusing on ways to make sure this never happens again all I get is "well it wasn't a PUBLIC restroom"

You guys looked at the article and decided that "well they really meant PUBLIC restroom" so this article is invalid.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Yet the fact that people keep saying "but the bathroom, why did the mention the bathroom" means that the point is being missed.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

shockthemonkey posted...

DelianSK posted...

Zodd3224 posted...

cjsdowg posted...

DelianSK posted...

Can someone point out please where the article "misleads" people into thinking it was a public restroom, or where anyone other than people saying "it was a private restroom" said anything about it being public.

When people talk about Liberals and saying why Liberals say that stuff doesn't happen, it is clear what the implications are. If this person wasn't Trans, seemingly nothing would have changed about the situation since it was in family bathroom.

They wouldnt have even mentioned bathroom in the title of the article if it wasnt a trans person.

Disagree. 3rd grade taught me the 5 W's
Who, What, Where, When, Why

Where- A bathroom

You can say you disagree but we all know the only reason this story keeps getting shared is because its about a trans person and a bathroom. Like the location clearly isnt a big part of what actually happened and yet its in every single headline regarding this case.

No you're absolutely right. Let's totally ignore the fact that a young child was raped and molested.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Zodd3224 posted...

cjsdowg posted...

DelianSK posted...

Can someone point out please where the article "misleads" people into thinking it was a public restroom, or where anyone other than people saying "it was a private restroom" said anything about it being public.

When people talk about Liberals and saying why Liberals say that stuff doesn't happen, it is clear what the implications are. If this person wasn't Trans, seemingly nothing would have changed about the situation since it was in family bathroom.

They wouldnt have even mentioned bathroom in the title of the article if it wasnt a trans person.

Disagree. 3rd grade taught me the 5 W's
Who, What, Where, When, Why

Where- A bathroom
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

What happened to you were right and they were wrong?

You seem to be happy about probation for something that wasn't a crime.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Darkman124 posted...

DelianSK posted...

Who is saying it was a public bathroom?

howl is saying that.

Edit: GDI Howl
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Can someone point out please where the article "misleads" people into thinking it was a public restroom, or where anyone other than people saying "it was a private restroom" said anything about it being public.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Who is saying it was a public bathroom?
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Ammonitida posted...

There are over a million transgender people in the US. With any population that large, you're going to find rapists.

Agreed.

Edit: Same with crooked cops, "Robin Hood" thieves, etc.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

After having a conversation with the mods about what is offensive and not-

http://www.dailywire.com/news/22496/transgender-charged-raping-10yo-girl-bathroom-amanda-prestigiacomo

Remix of this topic minus the "offensive" part.

Thoughts, comments, concerns?
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Right? And now if you call someone fat the world ends.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Weird.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Questionmarktarius posted...

FLUFFYGERM posted...

This is a dull response from you, considering you're typically a smart poster.

Seems I've gotten a case of the "fuck-it fridays" - sorry about that.

Tossing five billion of new annual income into any given locale is quite a bit.
It'll probably work out great, regardless of all my ranting about "kingmaking". It really is just too bad that it takes sweetheart deals to actually do that.

I would think one of the only ways to prevent stuff like this is to make sure that no matter what, every company has the same taxes NATIONWIDE. Which would be a huge infringement on states. Wouldn't ever happen.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

I just noticed they are promising 50,000 jobs. That's a lot.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Questionmarktarius posted...

DelianSK posted...

This is all money they didn't have before. The city isn't suddenly losing billions of dollars. It's not money they had to begin with. What they are saying is, well we can lower your taxes some if you choose to build here and employ our citizens.

But, the better idea is policy that encourages local economic conditions that make a business want to be there, instead of overt bribery and kingmaking.
Instead of a sweetheart tax deal for that one big company you want, just have lower taxes instead.

At best, these deals are the rough equivalent of "ladies night" at a bar. At worst, it's just dumping money down a hole.

Because what these companies want is lower taxes. I think a tradeoff of saying (NUMBERS ARE MADE UP) well, normally you would have to pay us 2 million in taxes, but since you're emplying all of these people from the area and we are getting taxes from them as well, we will accept 1 million dollars.

The reason people want it is because it's a huge, huge, HUGE deal for a city.

Edit: And your ladies night comment.... don't ladies night bring more people to the bars?
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

From my local news site (Harrisburg, PA)

According to Amazon's bidding documents, it plans to invest roughly $5 billion in infrastructure and construction.

That's an even bigger deal!
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Antifar posted...

Chicago: http://chicagotonight.wttw.com/2017/10/20/sources-say-amazon-incentives-ballpark-2-billion#.WensnKhLyqo.twitter
Newark: https://www.wsj.com/articles/newark-offers-7-billion-in-incentives-to-lure-amazon-1508191648?mod=e2tw
Pittsburgh: https://www.citylab.com/equity/2017/10/filmmaker-shows-unlivable-pittsburgh/542901/
NYC: https://twitter.com/GloriaPazmino/status/920679916697477121
Boston: http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/10/19/read-boston-full-bid-amazon/gmlG1jBfH2aGTftHNcHq0M/story.html

An Amazon campus would be a transit disaster in a lot of these places, to say nothing for the corporate welfare involved.

Let's see- a big gigantic corporation says hey, we want to create thousands of jobs, who wants us in their area? So cities, who WANT their people to be employed because they get things such as local taxes, payroll taxes, etc, BUT we will complain that to lure these people to their city they have to say, how about some tax breaks for you.

This is all money they didn't have before. The city isn't suddenly losing billions of dollars. It's not money they had to begin with. What they are saying is, well we can lower your taxes some if you choose to build here and employ our citizens.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Mystic Quest?
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Welcome to CE- Home of StrikeGently memes
https://imgur.com/a/xFMYq
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

StrikeGently posted...

Delian, you're so obsessed with me. Oh my god lol.

This is a different girl.

And good! This time maybe don't talk about how you know CPR in case she needs it or how dry her lips are.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Nah. I just like your joke stories.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

As opposed to this time last week when you:
Kept talking about kissing her
Creepily showed up at her house with soup
Got ghosted
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

thelovefist posted...

Squader is going to get violated on his parole conditions. He isn't supposed to be making videos.

Yet it's been a few weeks and that hasn't happened yet. I don't get it.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Sigh

That's the video from like 3 different phones now and not one makes him look like anything other than a dick.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

nt
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

New Orleans is sinking man...
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Just remember, C-Cup Otis was being a little bitch.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Trumpgret/
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Harambe has been dead for a while.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

ClunkerSlim posted...

How can you guys pick on Squaddy when hes out on the street fighting for your rights? ...literally.

......Holy shit. It's true.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

strikedgently posted...

DelianSK posted...

LightningAce11 posted...

I am saddened at the lack of strikegently memes.

Got'chu fam.

Oh look, the wizard of loneliness is following me again.

---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

LightningAce11 posted...

I am saddened at the lack of strikegently memes.

Got'chu fam.


---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

KazumaKiryu posted...

Thank you.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

There a link by chance?
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

GOATTHlEF posted...

strikedgently posted...

How about you find something to post about other than me? I've got women waiting their turn, so please hop off my ****.

*steals your goats*

Get this opportunity often?
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

I mean I could, SpellPoorly....

And by waiting your turn do you mean waiting your turn to ghost you?
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Because I like it.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

you can probably close this now ( https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/400-current-events/75888457 )

Since this topic is why people don't like you.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Is this the guile theme? I don't have audio right now.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

I had a sister who was legit mentally r-word. I've gotten warned for talking about her and using those words because guess what, that's what they are called.

Doesn't bug me when people use.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Natalie Portman
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Current thread in their sub:

"Is Harvey Weinstein only being accused because he is ugly?"

Seriously. Disgusting.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

RedWhiteBlue posted...

So many people shit on incels. There are more good ones than the vocal shitbags, ya know. And it comes down to a number of factors, like being hideous, not having opportunities, no money, and no social skills.

Welp....

A wild incel appears!
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

cjsdowg posted...

I don't know this group in general so I will not speak about them. They could be evil sexist bigots for all I know. So I am not defending them.

However the idea of people getting with one another and talking about their feelings should not be looked down on if it is done in a productive way. Let's be rule everyone is not going to have the same chance as everyone else to get some. So people who feel bad about that fact should not be made fun of because they are expressing themselves with like minded people.

Note once more this if they are doing it in positive way. If they are like some of these other groups .. well not name names. Who just bitch about woman in general then that is bad.

You're right, but your first sentence sums it up. These aren't just people in a support group helping each other.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.

Directly from their reddit.

What is an incel? An incel, short for involuntary celibate, is someone who tries to find romantic relationships without success and is very pessimistic about his chances. The most common definition to be considered incel is that you are at least 21 and have to go at least six months without a romantic partner. Many incels are late 20s and 30s men (and older) who have never had a partner. If you go to a prostitute, you can still be incel because you are unable to obtain a romantic relationship or at least casual sex where the other person is genuinely interested in you, as being incel is not just about a lack of sex. Being incel also does not mean one feels they are owed or entitled to love, sex, relationships - it is simply the perpetual state of the lack of them when they occur so naturally and frequently to the majority of people.

Aren't you making this part of your identity Nope, it does not become part of our identity outside of this subreddit. We don't walk around screaming to the world "woe is me we are incel!", proudly waving our flag high. We all live out our lives normally like anyone else. The younger incels are usually in school and the older ones are working. Some incels are NEET ("Not in Education, Employment, or Training") because they are struggling with severe mental health issues. We all still pursue our hobbies, interests, volunteer, travel, hang out with friends, and some even date. The only difference between us and you is the constant failure in attracting a romantic partner that has no explanation.

Basically- people who are horrible at dealing with other people and blame the fact that their nose isn't symmetrical for the fact that they really are just "nice guys" and blame women for their problems.
---

DawkinsNumber4 posted... I have no right to object to a public citizen in the US exercising their right to attend a court proceeding.