Lurker > NatsuSama

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1
TopicAthiest who survived the Las Vegas Massacre is now a firm believer in GOD!!
NatsuSama
10/05/17 10:46:03 PM
#72
Terra-enforcer posted...
Not sure what else to tell you kid. The last thing I would give a damn about is someone like you of all people getting a hissy fit because I choose to not entertain a person incapable of conversing like an adult. Don't worry, you may get there some day.

The kid calling someone a kid lol.

Literally everything you complained about, you have done throughout this entire topic. Claims "hissy fit" which is ironic to what you complained about moments ago. All while avoiding giving an actual rebuttal to the actual argument and relying on a meme. You are a comical and amusing one.
---
WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT
TopicAthiest who survived the Las Vegas Massacre is now a firm believer in GOD!!
NatsuSama
10/05/17 6:57:59 PM
#69
Terra-enforcer posted...
Clearly I have a rebuttal based on what I have posted, so it's dumb to try to use "you got no argument" excuse. I've just learned in my experience on this forum to refrain from entertaining manchildren and s***posters when I could have a normal adult discussion with someone else just as easily.

So, you dont actually have a rebuttal lol.

Im just loving how ironic it is of you to call someone childish....yet you cant actually respond to an argument with an actual rebuttal.

Your response is literally you ignoring an entire post because of something that isnt much of an insult at all....with you doing the ever so classic I have a rebuttal, but I cant actually produce it to you for reasons, but I totally have one. This right gere is a childish response. Man up that you dont actually have a rebuttal. Hell,pretending you even have one dont even bother respond to me as thats far for respectable. However dont go the I have one but dont want to tell you act.

The irony here lol.
---
WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT
TopicYou are allowed to prevent either Hitlers birth or Trump running for president
NatsuSama
10/05/17 2:34:23 PM
#120
No dpubt my vote goes to Trump.

What Hitler did was bad, but killing him would alter a great deal of history.

Stopping Trump alters far less.
---
WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT
TopicAthiest who survived the Las Vegas Massacre is now a firm believer in GOD!!
NatsuSama
10/05/17 1:38:15 PM
#65
Terra-enforcer posted...
And if I'm oh so triggered, wouldn't you expect me to stop talking anyway or whatever?

You mean what you are doing now? Avoiding giving an actual rebuttal? Hardly any different than from not responding at all. Why? Because I said something thats hardly a damaging insult, "you are becoming easily triggered."

Terra-enforcer posted...

Because of what I said. It's childish as hell, and it would be akin to someone telling me "you mad bruh." I'm not going to entertain such childishness because it's just dumb and a waste of time

So in translation, "I dont have an actual rebuttal to your response, so Im going to latch onto the most trivial thing I can find. While having the audacity to call anyone childish."

Got it, thats all you had to say.
---
WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT
TopicAthiest who survived the Las Vegas Massacre is now a firm believer in GOD!!
NatsuSama
10/05/17 12:21:04 PM
#59
Terra-enforcer posted...
NatsuSama posted...
You are becoming eaaily triggered

Oh, this is the kind of person I'm arguing with >_>. I guess I just got so hot and heated making a casual response on a video game forum I didn't even notice /s

Like come on, you have to realize how incredibly childish that comment comes across. Instantly jumping to the "u triggered bruh" response when nothing in my post even remotely implies that. Sorry you have such a problem with people disagreeing with you? I have no intention in humoring people like that. Feels like I'm arguing with a middle schooler.

Then try responding to the rest of the post. Lol
I love how it was ignored for something trivial as, "you are becoming easily triggered."
---
WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT
TopicAthiest who survived the Las Vegas Massacre is now a firm believer in GOD!!
NatsuSama
10/05/17 12:08:33 PM
#56
Terra-enforcer posted...
Your argument in calling me "ignorant" is based on unsubstantiated statements and assumptions. And I'm the ignorant one? Okay man.

You are becoming eaaily triggered yet not even bothering to thuroughly read what I said. I didnt assume anything when I said, "many atheist used to be religious and just dropped it. So its just as ignorant to claim someone just doesnt understand the religoun." You are the one who first came into this topic and claimed someone else was ignorant of a religioun. You are the one who assumed they were ignorant of said religioun and you had this all divine outlook that they didnt have. The only thing I did was call you out on assuming they were ignorant.

Terra-enforcer posted...
That was never part of my argument, but I did already explain based on what I know about the religion what my take on the topic is. Disagree with it, not sure what to tell you. Some random forum post isn't going to change what literal billions of people think (on either side).

I had 0 interest in changing a religious persons mind. Its a wasted effort to try.
Regardless of what you "know" about said religioun, it doesnt change what other people "know." Like I said, its just as ignorant to think you are more knowledgeable in the religioun just because people dropped it for reasons you dont like.

Terra-enforcer posted...
Not sure where I implied think otherwise. I know what agnosticism is.

I never claimed you in specific implied this. I said the topic has glossed over this detail since such an article is pushing for a narrative like this guy made a huge jump. Agnostic Theist to Theist isnt a big leap. And Agnostic Atheist to Theist, is a slightly bigger jump. Agnostics dont 100% reject the idea of gods existance so converting them isnt unfathomable.
---
WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT
TopicAthiest who survived the Las Vegas Massacre is now a firm believer in GOD!!
NatsuSama
10/05/17 10:19:44 AM
#49
Terra-enforcer posted...
Nikra posted...
If there was a god, it wouldn't had happen in the first place.

St0rmFury posted...
So I guess God didn't give a fuck about the dead victims?

You clearly don't understand the religion, so why bother making such ignorant remarks?

First off, nothing according to the Judeo-Christian beliefs, death is not the end. So obviously under that belief, it should be embraced as opposed to feared as people who view death as 'the end' view it. From that alone it should be easy why it's silly as heck to use a situation such as this as a reason to claim God doesn't exist.

Furthermore, according to the Bible, events like this could serve as tests and/or testaments for the lives of others (i.e. this person in the video, or an event like this causing someone to come to evangelizing).

Disagree with that logic all you want, but to state what you are on this subject just exposes your ignorance to the subject.

This is like a whole mental gymnastics. My issue with religioun, its logic tends to be when the argument suits me based.

First many atheist used to be religious and just dropped it. So its just as ignorant to claim someone just doesnt understand the religoun.

Second, the guys logic for becoming a firm believer is more religioun( agnostic theist) based than atheist based. A point ill get to later. God supposedly chose to have all those poor people slaughtered and chose random special snowflakes to let live. Granted I didnt read the actual article and only this topic, but Im failing to see how this guy was a straight up atheist.

Third, id like to point out something that has been glossed over. Theres a difference between an agnostic person and an atheist. Agnostics can range from agnostic theist to agnostic atheist.

An Agnostic Theist in short doesnt believe theres enough evidence to prove god doesnt exist, however doesnt firmly believe he exists.
An Agnostic Atheist in short doesnt believe theres enough evidence god actually exist, however doesnt firmly believe he doesnt exist.
A Theist no doubt believes in a god
An Atheist no doubt believes a god doesnt exist.
---
WAAAH, I CAN'T BEAT THIS GUY WITH HIS TACTICS, I'M GONNA CALL IT SPAM AND CONDEMN HIM FOR USING IT
Board List
Page List: 1