Lurker > TheOneWithin

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Board List
Page List: 1, 2
TopicDoes this winter seem unusually depressing?
TheOneWithin
01/29/18 8:51:15 PM
#1
Does this winter seem unusually depressing?


I think it's the fact that this winter has been cold/harsh and also the state of the world itself. It seems a lot of people are not in the best of moods lately
TopicDo Trump supporters still like Steve Bannon
TheOneWithin
01/12/18 9:32:02 PM
#1
Nt
TopicYou think Obama can sue Trump for slander/libel
TheOneWithin
01/06/18 4:07:57 PM
#5
LittleRoyal posted...
I thought there was evidence? Also politicians could all sue each other its just petty but people want it because we all hate trump

The only evidence was that the Obama administration was tracking Russian figures that had contact with Trump but never wiretapped Trump or anyone on his team
TopicYou think Obama can sue Trump for slander/libel
TheOneWithin
01/06/18 4:03:14 PM
#1
Like literally in March he accused Obama without any evidence of a serious felony (the whole wiretapping thing).
TopicMy friend got an "MBA" from a for profit college. How do you break it
TheOneWithin
01/04/18 5:46:38 PM
#7
For profits are not accredited colleges. Yeah he can get a sales job but he could have done that with his bachelors. He did this to get a career change and none of the big companies will take a non accredited degree seriously. I'm not trying to ruin his happiness, but I don't want him to live on false hope
TopicMy friend got an "MBA" from a for profit college. How do you break it
TheOneWithin
01/04/18 5:41:06 PM
#5
Giant_Aspirin posted...
ir you were genuinely concerned for his well being you would have brought this up prior to him completing it. if you bring it up now you just sound like a salty jerk tbh

I had no idea he was completing it. He just announced after he got his MBA.
TopicMy friend got an "MBA" from a for profit college. How do you break it
TheOneWithin
01/04/18 5:35:50 PM
#1
To him that his MBA is probably useless? The reason I want to do this is because I don't want him go through a slow and painful process of being rejected for jobs and realizing he may have gotten scammed. He's not in the best place right now so I want to approach this with care
TopicThinking about wearing a cape to prom like my fav video game chars. Good idea?
TheOneWithin
12/28/17 12:36:23 AM
#1
Hey everyone, so prom is coming up in four months and I know if I'm going to pull this off I need to do it correctly. I've seen many unique prom costumes and ideas, but I wanted to do something that's very unique to me.

I'm a huge fan of Marth from the Fire Emblem series and I wanted to make a tuxedo combo similar to his attire:

http://www.smashbros.com/images/og/marth.jpg

I was thinking of wearing a navy blue/deep blue tux and then have a custom constructed red/blue cape flowing from me.

What do you guys think?
TopicTrump gives THANKS to Conservative Group who said they HATE BLACK PEOPLE!!
TheOneWithin
12/24/17 12:59:06 AM
#28
r4X0r posted...
gguirao posted...
We all know Trump thinks most racists are good people.


We do? Please present proof of that.

One of the larger problems with leftists is their complete inability to discern between something that's true and something that they want to be true.


We give you proof every single time but you don't listen. It's always the same rebuttal of "wah the democrats do it, or it's not big deal".

One blatant lie that I never got a clear answer to is that Trump specifically said he has never met any of the accusers who say he sexually assaulted them but there's pictures of him standing next to the accusers. That's something Trump blatantly lied about. THAT IS A LIE. Yet no Trump supporters actually admit Trump lied about any of that, just scream fake news, or some other shit.

We tell you these things every single time and yet you don't listen to anything, so stop blaming us when you refuse to change your world view
TopicTrump gives THANKS to Conservative Group who said they HATE BLACK PEOPLE!!
TheOneWithin
12/24/17 12:55:45 AM
#27
r4X0r posted...
Halo478 posted...
What about your precious white men that run people over in cars just good white boys


What about your precious black women that run over people in cars just good black girls

https://tinyurl.com/nr9yo3e

Again, most poorly informed current events forum on the entire Internet. There's so many people here who are so opposed to actually being informed human beings.


Did you even read your own link? It says right there she wasn't associated with anyone and there isn't any proof of her being associated with a group. This is much different than the one in charlottesville because he openly identified with the alt right group and marched earlier.

Besides if the whole argument are the democrats are corrupt and conservatives aren't, why aren't you holding conservatives who get low accountable? Why aren't you pushing conservatives to have a higher standard or do you just not care about having these high standards yourself?
TopicTax cut didn't do anything. Hundreds of AT & T of employees laid off
TheOneWithin
12/22/17 9:37:54 AM
#29
JustMyOpinion posted...
TheOneWithin posted...
JustMyOpinion posted...
Sounds like you're reaching quite a bit just because you're in tech. I doubt every single tech company functions the same. I'm in CPG and I have no idea what P&G does in terms of hiring and firing policies other than what I read.


There's no fucking reaching. There's nothing that's unique about doing paper work and it's just a non efficient thing for any company. This is not how rehiring works because the amount of time they have to put forth towards compliance is not going to be favorable to them. This federal law, no company has any unique spin on this


You act like just because it's inefficient it never happens. My mom's a teacher aide and the school she works for does that every single Summer. They "fire" everyone and rehire (most of) them back. But, assuming even zero of these people get hired back, that still is not proof these workers were not redundant. Proof AT&T is scummy, yes, but not proof against their claim they were redundant. Which again, you do not have intimate knowledge if these workers are or aren't redundant just because you work in tech.


My point is this tax bill isn't trickling down shit. Companies will find a way to consolidate and readjust their costs like they always do and wages aren't going to increase under this tax plan
TopicTax cut didn't do anything. Hundreds of AT & T of employees laid off
TheOneWithin
12/22/17 9:28:27 AM
#27
ghettoraider81 posted...
If you don't understand that it's cheaper to retain an employee than to fire and rehire then there is nothing TC can say to educate you.


Yeah exactly. The company has to set up interviews, pay for relocation, pay for all the compliance and paperwork and then hire someone and that's not even counting how much they're losing on employees needing to be trained and their productivity being low initially. There is no motivation to fire and rehire other than the fact they're firing a lot more people than hiring
TopicTax cut didn't do anything. Hundreds of AT & T of employees laid off
TheOneWithin
12/22/17 9:23:28 AM
#25
JustMyOpinion posted...
Sounds like you're reaching quite a bit just because you're in tech. I doubt every single tech company functions the same. I'm in CPG and I have no idea what P&G does in terms of hiring and firing policies other than what I read.


There's no fucking reaching. There's nothing that's unique about doing paper work and it's just a non efficient thing for any company. This is not how rehiring works because the amount of time they have to put forth towards compliance is not going to be favorable to them. This federal law, no company has any unique spin on this
TopicTax cut didn't do anything. Hundreds of AT & T of employees laid off
TheOneWithin
12/22/17 9:17:57 AM
#23
JustMyOpinion posted...
TheOneWithin posted...
JustMyOpinion posted...
Oh ok, so your version of proof is them opening up their books to you and walking you step by step through why this decision made sense. Yeah, that's not unreasonable at all.


My version is that I'm in the industry myself and I know how it works. This isn't how rehiring works and it's them putting on a front. Tell me are you in the industry? Do you have actually have a career or are you just ignorant on how hiring processes work?


Oh wow and now you're attacking me? You don't sound biased at all. It's nice you've framed this as "I'm in the same industry and anyone who isn't has a less informed and thus wrong opinion if it differs from mine." Very convenient.

Yeah I'm biased about the fact that you don't know what you're talking about. The amount of paperwork they have to pull off to fire and rehire isn't efficient at all, and they're firing to save profits. Normally I wouldn't care, but it's the fact they're trying to argue it's going to trickle down to employees when it's false and just a PR move
TopicTax cut didn't do anything. Hundreds of AT & T of employees laid off
TheOneWithin
12/22/17 9:11:38 AM
#20
JustMyOpinion posted...
Oh ok, so your version of proof is them opening up their books to you and walking you step by step through why this decision made sense. Yeah, that's not unreasonable at all.


My version is that I'm in the industry myself and I know how it works. This isn't how rehiring works and it's them putting on a front. Tell me are you in the industry? Do you have actually have a career or are you just ignorant on how hiring processes work?
TopicTax cut didn't do anything. Hundreds of AT & T of employees laid off
TheOneWithin
12/22/17 9:09:40 AM
#16
Not only that but they don't give specific numbers on "many" job offer replacements when it's not a hard number to pull out. What the fuck does "many" mean? This is just them disguising firing them and then still look good in terms of PR
TopicTax cut didn't do anything. Hundreds of AT & T of employees laid off
TheOneWithin
12/22/17 9:07:03 AM
#11
JustMyOpinion posted...
TheOneWithin posted...
JustMyOpinion posted...
This is at least the third topic on this. Maybe you should have read the other topics and understood how keeping on workers when you don't have enough work for them is probably not a good idea. Then you'd complain the tax break is funding people to sit around and do nothing.


Where is the proof there is not enough work for them to go around


Did you actually read the article? It's in AT&T's statement and right below it too.


Yes they made a statement but it's an empty one that's not being backed up by anything. Why would they lay off first and not try to work to find replacement jobs? That's not how it works.

Listen I know you probably think I'm some neckbeard loser who leaches off the system, but I have a career myself and a STEM degree and know how the industry works too.

My friend was recently "laid off" at Intel, but Intel didn't actually lay him off. They first moved him to another division and then effectively replaced jobs.

I'm in the tech industry and I have friends in the tech industry and no company lays off people first and then tries to rehire them. Why would they waste the time with all the paper work that's involved. This is just a move to reduce accountability for AT & T. They fire first, they say they tried to rehire, it didn't work out and then they blame it on a "changing workforce".
TopicTax cut didn't do anything. Hundreds of AT & T of employees laid off
TheOneWithin
12/22/17 9:01:19 AM
#8
JustMyOpinion posted...
This is at least the third topic on this. Maybe you should have read the other topics and understood how keeping on workers when you don't have enough work for them is probably not a good idea. Then you'd complain the tax break is funding people to sit around and do nothing.


Where is the proof there is not enough work for them to go around
TopicTax cut didn't do anything. Hundreds of AT & T of employees laid off
TheOneWithin
12/22/17 8:59:49 AM
#7
Dark_Spiret posted...
not that its not shitty, but thats pretty standard around the holidays.


Yeah I know budgets are reanalyzed and then people get fired/hired, but with their added increase in income they should be able to maintain their overall work numbers right? The question is that does AT & T actually trickle down their profits like the tax bill suggests they do or is it a shitty PR move. I'm much more inclined to believe it's the latter
TopicTax cut didn't do anything. Hundreds of AT & T of employees laid off
TheOneWithin
12/22/17 8:55:52 AM
#1
http://fox4kc.com/2017/12/20/hundreds-of-metro-att-employees-laid-off-just-before-christmas/

A lot of news has been highlighting the "trickle" down effect of employees getting bonuses when that's complete bullshit. It's corporations pulling off a PR move, not cutting anything from the top or trickling down anything, and then trying to quietly pull shit off like this.

Hundreds of employees easily ends up with millions of dollars in salary. Take that cost and give it to employees and you can easily give a small bonus of 1000 dollars.
TopicGreek Achilles to be played by a black person in new BBC/Netflix series.
TheOneWithin
12/21/17 1:25:26 PM
#113
What's the government system of Sparta and why did Rome use that as motivation for their own political system. This is an easy as hell question if you actually knew anything about Greek history
TopicGreek Achilles to be played by a black person in new BBC/Netflix series.
TheOneWithin
12/21/17 1:22:44 PM
#110
RoseIsHorriblle posted...
TheOneWithin is a total troll. He even said that Oddyseus didn't exist which not true. There is considerable proof that Oddyseus was a real historical person. Troll can you stop trolling and offending me. As a Greek I would know more than you and your delusions.

Shut up you can't even spell his name right. You don't know anything about this and you still haven't provided evidence or proof of the Illiad taking place (because there isn't any)
TopicGreek Achilles to be played by a black person in new BBC/Netflix series.
TheOneWithin
12/21/17 1:20:25 PM
#107
Fishy posted...
pinky0926 posted...
Ok so basically he's immortal except for his ankles because when the goddess of water dipped him in the river of the dead she forgot to dip him all the way in

But he's not a black guy, that would be absolutely ridiculous and not realistic

It'd be a bit like making Sun Wukong a Native American.

Sun Wukong is a monkey God. How the fuck do you make that Native American
TopicGreek Achilles to be played by a black person in new BBC/Netflix series.
TheOneWithin
12/21/17 1:17:03 PM
#105
Capn Circus posted...
TheOneWithin posted...
Wow this topic sucks. Shitty Trump supporter cites the fucking Illiad as a historical retelling. Let me guess the Kraken is just an Orca that's just exaggerated. There is no evidence of an Achilles existing, same with Helen, hell there's not even evidence of an actual 10 year Trojan war. The only person that's historic is Agammemnon


What would make you think if they did exist there's a huge possibility of them being black?

Who gives a shit they're all fake. This is a story that has giant sea monsters lead by a guy with a trident. I just want to clarify there is no actual proof of Agammemnon existing but there are kings of Mycenae that did exist and the argument (although weak) is that Agammemnon was based off one of them
TopicGreek Achilles to be played by a black person in new BBC/Netflix series.
TheOneWithin
12/21/17 1:09:44 PM
#101
Wow this topic sucks. Shitty Trump supporter cites the fucking Illiad as a historical retelling. Let me guess the Kraken is just an Orca that's just exaggerated. There is no evidence of an Achilles existing, same with Helen, hell there's not even evidence of an actual 10 year Trojan war. The only person that's historic is Agammemnon
TopicGreek Achilles to be played by a black person in new BBC/Netflix series.
TheOneWithin
12/21/17 12:59:47 PM
#91
RoseIsHorriblle posted...
TheVipaGTS posted...
RoseIsHorriblle posted...
TheVipaGTS posted...
Isnt Achilles a mythical person? Does his whiteness play a role in who he is as a character? Then Im not seeing the issue lol.

If his being white mattered to the role or if he was a real person Id agree this is dumb.

No he is not. He is a historical person. That's equally offensive tbh. Can you leave this topic if you are clueless?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achilles

This is the guy youre talking about right?

Illiad was based on real events. Same applies to Achilles. His powers were exaggerated but he was a real person.

Same applies to other historical figures like Jesus or Muhammed whose powers were exaggerated.

You learn something every day liberal troll.

He is not a real fucking person. Neither is Perseus or Medusa, or Odysseus. Give me historical evidence of Achilles existing
TopicGreek Achilles to be played by a black person in new BBC/Netflix series.
TheOneWithin
12/21/17 12:57:47 PM
#84
RoseIsHorriblle posted...
TheVipaGTS posted...
Isnt Achilles a mythical person? Does his whiteness play a role in who he is as a character? Then Im not seeing the issue lol.

If his being white mattered to the role or if he was a real person Id agree this is dumb.

No he is not. He is a historical person. That's equally offensive tbh. Can you leave this topic if you are clueless?

What the fuck are you talking about? There is no recorded history of an actual Achilles existing. This isn't Agammemnon who was an actual military leader, but a completely made up figure written for the Illiad. Like you realize the Illiad isn't a historical telling of anything and there is no proof of an actual Trojan war existing right?
TopicTrump forums are great right now. Seems there is a civil war between Bannon
TheOneWithin
12/13/17 3:08:20 PM
#6
An ego too huge to ever admit wrong. That's going to burn allies as narcissism always does. I'm curious how the Bannon vs Trump factions will end up
TopicTrump forums are great right now. Seems there is a civil war between Bannon
TheOneWithin
12/13/17 3:07:37 PM
#5
Kineth posted...
TheOneWithin posted...
Now that Trump is saying Moore was always a bad candidate and should have went with Strange, the two sides are fighting


Wow. Trump that's gutless even by Trump's standards.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/940904649728708609
TopicTrump forums are great right now. Seems there is a civil war between Bannon
TheOneWithin
12/13/17 3:00:56 PM
#3
uwnim posted...
Why would this election cause problems for them like that?


Bannon endorsed Moore, Trump endorsed Luther Strange. When Bannon kept endorsing Moore and he won the primary the Trump community aligned under Moore. Now that Trump is saying Moore was always a bad candidate and should have went with Strange, the two sides are fighting
TopicTrump forums are great right now. Seems there is a civil war between Bannon
TheOneWithin
12/13/17 2:58:39 PM
#1
apologists and hardcore Trumpians.

Man, this is going to be a fun few weeks. Who would have thought Alabama would go to a pro choice democrat.

Feels good man
TopicAlabama, considered the safest Republican seat, just went blue
TheOneWithin
12/12/17 10:29:07 PM
#1
Lol
TopicThe president is seven years old
TheOneWithin
11/27/17 1:02:36 PM
#111
I love how Trump supporters always claim liberals are lazy people, but think putting in work to be a disciplined person is too much.

I was in a STEM program where we worked our asses off. I have friends who worked at NASA and I've worked in labs where NASA helped out/contracted with and we all think Trump is an unhinged dumbass who has no discipline. Yet the MAGA idiots will think we're ivory tower snowflakes when we're the ones busting our assess off doing 12 our days or working 6 or 7 days a week to get our shit done.

Instead of putting in the work to do that or working to have a disciplined personality they throw a shitty tantrum and elect someone who vindicates their personality, because that's easy. It's the easy way out and that's all they want.
TopicThe president is seven years old
TheOneWithin
11/27/17 12:53:02 PM
#106
Trump apparently made a conspiracy theory that involved him as the original claim:

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-now-claiming-access-hollywood-tape-which-he-boasted-sexually-assaulting-722513

Truly amazing
TopicThe president is seven years old
TheOneWithin
11/27/17 12:50:47 PM
#101
Trump supporters at this point are just the same breed of immature unhinged personality as Trump. All they want is no consequences for their actions, but society doesn't work like that. Being presidential means not acting like an unhinged, petty dumb ass who lies a great amount of time(convenient you didn't mention blatant lies Trump has made)

Trump being in the highest office represents vindication for their immaturity and that's all it is
TopicThe president is seven years old
TheOneWithin
11/27/17 12:45:54 PM
#94
Caution998 posted...
Dustin1280 posted...
Caution998 posted...
They report exaggerated truths.
We've all been had. There's no reason why people from both sides of the political spectrum simply cannot get along and live in harmony.

All I want is for people to dislike Trump for the right reasons. Don't hate him because "he's a child" or "OMG hes so dumb!!" Dislike him for the policies he believes in.

They focus on so much nonsense.

Sorry...

But if the president of the united states acts like a child, gets incredibly upset over critism, is petty, and constantly is insulting people that urk him, then he is NOT presidential material REGARDLESS of his polices...

I have met CHILDREN that would act more mature then trump does in the public spotlight...


The more and more your side goes berserk over his personality, the more and more his supporters love him. You don't get it.

Being "presidential" literally means nothing. You want him to act fake. That's what you want? You want him to act fake? Think about what you're asking for. If he acts fake, then you'll NEVER know how he feels about things. At least we know what makes him tick. Obama was a phony for the cameras. Who the hell knows what he really thought about anything.

I think it's a breath of FRESH AIR that our president doesn't put on a show for the cameras.


No one is going is berserk by criticizing the president on his immaturity.
TopicDo you think Donald Trump will be re-elected?
TheOneWithin
11/27/17 12:40:52 PM
#82
SamuelHayden posted...
Guys let's accept it, the ethnostate platform works for the GOP, and it's damn near impossible to defeat.

They've gotten people who assault reporters to congress. They've gotten people caught on tape saying they grab women by the p**** because they're stars elected. They may be about to elect a pedo to congress too.

Their voters are ok with losing healthcare and literally dying as long as the ethnostate agenda is going strong.

How do you beat such a thing?!


We've beat it several times before, we'll beat it again, but it requires has to work hard and not be complacent
TopicThe president is seven years old
TheOneWithin
11/27/17 12:37:38 PM
#84
Dustin1280 posted...
Can we all agree that if you want real news that isn't INCREDIBLY slanted, you should just stay away from Fox, MSNBC, and CNN in general...

But if your goto is Breitbart or Buzzfeed, then stick with those three...


I actually just read the papers. New York Times/WaPo etc do a good job of being factual and separating their opinion based pieces from their pure reporting
TopicSo are Trump supporters for the free market or what?(Keurig Boycott)
TheOneWithin
11/16/17 7:21:46 AM
#1
I thought the whole point is that companies and industries have choice in where they can spend their money and advertising. Free market activists always say the market works itself out and its driven by the choices by the company

So why the fuck are Trump supporters mad that Keuring is exercising their right to pull ads that they originally paid for? Are they for or against the free market.

Also how the hell are you going to call yourself thick skinned when you smash coffee makers and boycott for a company practicing their right in the free market
TopicWhere's that winning Trump supporters?
TheOneWithin
11/08/17 11:35:29 AM
#59
Damn those tears are salty
TopicWhere's that winning Trump supporters?
TheOneWithin
11/07/17 10:13:04 PM
#39
scorpion41 posted...
TheOneWithin posted...
scorpion41 posted...
TheOneWithin posted...
scorpion41 posted...
Dems will be popping happy boners for every little victory...even in left leaning states.

Yeah because we won. You better get used to it, because Trump's dumbass definitely lit a fire


Calling Virginia a victory is like the Browns beating the 49ers...doesnt really mean shit in the big picture. Let me know if they win Texas.

I'll let you know when we win the midterm elections


Lol werent they supposed to have taken over by now?

No because senate and house elections haven't occurred. You know how elections work right? They have to first happen before people get elected
TopicWhere's that winning Trump supporters?
TheOneWithin
11/07/17 10:00:57 PM
#36
scorpion41 posted...
TheOneWithin posted...
scorpion41 posted...
Dems will be popping happy boners for every little victory...even in left leaning states.

Yeah because we won. You better get used to it, because Trump's dumbass definitely lit a fire


Calling Virginia a victory is like the Browns beating the 49ers...doesnt really mean shit in the big picture. Let me know if they win Texas.

I'll let you know when we win the midterm elections
TopicWhere's that winning Trump supporters?
TheOneWithin
11/07/17 9:41:37 PM
#31
scorpion41 posted...
Dems will be popping happy boners for every little victory...even in left leaning states.

Yeah because we won. You better get used to it, because Trump's dumbass definitely lit a fire
TopicWhere's that winning Trump supporters?
TheOneWithin
11/07/17 9:34:37 PM
#27
Bump
TopicWhere's that winning Trump supporters?
TheOneWithin
11/07/17 9:23:48 PM
#26
Capn Circus posted...
TheOneWithin posted...
BLAKUboy posted...
I love that the damage control is basically "But the Dems winning doesn't mean the Dems are winning!"


"They didn't win by enough!"

>Dems have complete control over the state legislature

"That was suppose to happen!"


It's Virginia. It was headed in that direction anyway. The last governor was a liberal and they voted for liberal Hillary.

Sure, of course I would admit it would have been nice to see the opposite. But it's not like the liberals went and turned a red state blue. Trump turned blue states red. Never forget that.


You really don't get how much of a landslide Dems won by, do you?

https://twitter.com/Bencjacobs/status/928082355826380800

They have complete control of the state legislature. The only other states that can actually say that are California, Oregon and Washington, the most liberal west coast states. This happening in motherfucking Virginia is not what anyone predicted
TopicWhere's that winning Trump supporters?
TheOneWithin
11/07/17 9:19:06 PM
#21
C_Pain posted...
imagine being this salty about trump everyday of your life

maga


And the most ironic thing about this post is that the moment dems win you'll be on here whining everyday about PC culture or some dumb shit like that
TopicWhere's that winning Trump supporters?
TheOneWithin
11/07/17 9:17:22 PM
#18
TopicWhere's that winning Trump supporters?
TheOneWithin
11/07/17 9:16:26 PM
#16
BLAKUboy posted...
I love that the damage control is basically "But the Dems winning doesn't mean the Dems are winning!"


"They didn't win by enough!"

>Dems have complete control over the state legislature

"That was suppose to happen!"
TopicWhere's that winning Trump supporters?
TheOneWithin
11/07/17 9:11:14 PM
#13
KazumaKiryu posted...
Actually Virginia was already a blue state, and the speculation was on if it had turned red. It didn't, so there are no surprises.


Virginia turned even more blue which is the whole point. They have complete control of the state legislature. Even if people predicted Northam to win very few predicted a complete overhaul of the state legislature to dems
TopicWhere's that winning Trump supporters?
TheOneWithin
11/07/17 9:09:48 PM
#11
glitteringfairy posted...
Hinakuluiau posted...
glitteringfairy posted...
Well that depends on if 7 years is a long time to you or not

I don't see Trump resigning or being impeached, but he's definitely not getting a second term.

either way, 3 or 7, that's not exactly soon


If Dems gain control of the house they'll start impeachment. Whether they can get an impeachment or not isn't the point, it's the fact there is an impeachment. Clinton and Nixon could not get anything to pass during their impeachment processes and were too busy with it to do anything effective.

If congress is controlled by the Dems then Trump isn't doing shit. He can't even do shit when they control the house and senate and you really think he could try for something if it falls under Dem control and he goes under impeachment charges?
Board List
Page List: 1, 2