Lurker > darkjedilink

https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1117266_directors-tesla-model-s-catches-fire-in-l-a

Literally burst into flames while sitting in traffic.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

What rules of capitalism can be exploited?

I have a good or service, that I trade to you for an agreed to good or service.

THAT'S IT. Capitalism.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

C_Pain posted...

telsa doing well is the fake news

gov't propping that garbage company up

They're still operating at MASSIVE losses.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

FLUFFYGERM posted...

Anywho, I'm like...inches away from ordering a Model 3. The 310-mile range one with the dual motors. Tempted to get the autonomous driving packages too but that's like another $10,000. Without that stuff, the price of the car is around $60,000 for the dual-motor vehicle. Minus $7,500 once the federal tax credit kicks in.

Pretty expensive, but for the gas savings/maintenance savings over the lifetime of the vehicle it wouldn't actually be that much more expensive than a nice gas car. Plus I could be supporting one of the brands that is the imo in the top three most important brands right now.

Until it starts on fire while you're sitting in traffic....

https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1117266_directors-tesla-model-s-catches-fire-in-l-a

Or was that faked by shortsellers, TC?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

chrono625 posted...

Solid Snake07 posted...

What a bunch of losers. anyone else laugh their ass off when the girl declared her love for someone at 0:44?

What are they shooting them with?

Probably bear mace or something.

Although if you're referring to what sounded like gun fire, may have been firecrackers or maybe non lethal warning shots.

No to both. They were using salt guns.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Uncle Choad posted...

darkjedilink posted...

Questionmarktarius posted...

darkjedilink posted...

and pretty much every plastic straw in existence.

The big problem is, they aren't marked as to what plastic they're made of.
They essentially have to treated as #7, which is basically a "lol, i dunno" catch-all.

I never understood this argument, anyway. So many cities do single-sort recycling, so why does it even matter?

It gets sorted somewhere, just not at the bin.

I'm pretty sure most recycled shit ends up in incinerators/landfills anyway, because it's cheaper and uses less energy. It just makes people feel good.

I am, too, which is another reason why this move by Starbucks is worse for the environment than literally not making any changes whatsoever.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

CruelBuffalo posted...

darkjedilink posted...

CruelBuffalo posted...

darkjedilink posted...

CruelBuffalo posted...

And once again, the lids are recyclable. Many states and urban areas have these bins that are for recycling. Its a really a fascinating concept.

Pretty much all plastics are recyclable. Including the old lids, and pretty much every plastic straw in existence.

No the straws were not recyclable because of the size and density has Starbucks as stated multiple times

Is that why my single-sort recycling collection specifically says straws are okay to recycle?

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/09/business/starbucks-plastic-straws.html

In the United States alone, an estimated more than 500 million disposable plastic straws are used every day, according to Eco-Cycle, a nonprofit recycling organization. Although plastic straws are made from polypropylene, a recyclable plastic, most recyclers wont accept them.

Plastic straws are pretty small and lightweight, so when theyre going through the mechanical sorter, theyre often lost or diverted, said Sam Athey, a plastics pollution researcher and member of the Plastic Ocean Project, a nonprofit based in Wilmington, N.C., that aims to reduce plastic use.

That means plastic straws get tossed in the garbage, ending up in landfills and polluting the ocean...

It is difficult to know how many straws or straw particles end up in the worlds waterways and oceans, but plastic straws are one of the most common items found on beaches, according to the Ocean Conservancy, whose volunteers have picked up more than 9 million straws and stirrers from beaches and waterways.

So, they literally are recyclable.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

CruelBuffalo posted...

darkjedilink posted...

CruelBuffalo posted...

And once again, the lids are recyclable. Many states and urban areas have these bins that are for recycling. Its a really a fascinating concept.

Pretty much all plastics are recyclable. Including the old lids, and pretty much every plastic straw in existence.

No the straws were not recyclable because of the size and density has Starbucks as stated multiple times

Is that why my single-sort recycling collection specifically says straws are okay to recycle?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Questionmarktarius posted...

darkjedilink posted...

and pretty much every plastic straw in existence.

The big problem is, they aren't marked as to what plastic they're made of.
They essentially have to treated as #7, which is basically a "lol, i dunno" catch-all.

I never understood this argument, anyway. So many cities do single-sort recycling, so why does it even matter?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

FLUFFYGERM posted...

so it really was just virtue signaling

lmfao

Of course it was.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

CruelBuffalo posted...

And once again, the lids are recyclable. Many states and urban areas have these bins that are for recycling. Its a really a fascinating concept.

Pretty much all plastics are recyclable. Including the old lids, and pretty much every plastic straw in existence.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

kingdrake2 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

ChainedRedone posted...

Straws are more dangerous to life forms because of their size, though. It's the smaller plastics that get trapped in organisms.

All plastics become microplastics. If you read the article, you'd know that straws are more dangerous long-term.

fixed. never forget what happens with those straws and sea turtles. we learned what happens.

That's literally false, and scientifically proven false.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

ChainedRedone posted...

Straws are more dangerous to life forms because of their size, though. It's the smaller plastics that get trapped in organisms.

All plastics become microplastics. If you read the article, you'd know that straws are less dangerous long-term.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

https://reason.com/blog/2018/07/12/starbucks-straw-ban-will-see-the-company

tl,dr: the amount of plastic used by the new lid is actually higher than that of the old lid/straw combo, meaning MORE plastic will end up in the dump, not less.

Yay, environment!
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

MrPeppers posted...

Lol did you just go back and stealth edit your other post?

The whole point is that there is justification for funneling money into breast cancer research, and money for cancer research is not zero sum. One foundation receiving millions of dollars for research does not mean another foundation was deprived of those funds and it's literally insane to even imply that. And if you were to even be consistent with your hare-brained logic, you should be pining for pancreatic cancer research as it is a fucking atrocious form of cancer with abysmal survival rates.

You're complaining about breast cancer research and attributing its foundation to feminists when epidemiologists, researchers, physicians, and organizations of highly qualified individuals much, much more versed on any of this than either you or your boogeyman feminists are the driving force behind it.

When it comes to federal funding, it literally is zero-sum.

And I do want more funding for pancreatic cancer - I jever suggested otherwise
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

hockeybub89 posted...

SageHarpuia posted...

You can come up with different comparisons all but at the end of the day they still own the connection. And last time I checked the First Amendment was to keep the government's powers in check, it has nothing to do with random company who happens to have a gateway to a form of communication.

We can't give ISPs control of a region AND give them control over what you can and cannot see if it doesn't line up with their values. Because that is effectively the people giving up their free speech for their corporate overlords to exercise theirs. Websites controlling their content is one thing. This is an entirely different ballpark in an entirely different city.

Except it isn't. If you're going to violate the First Amendment rights of ISP's, then you ALSO must violate the First Amendment rights of hosts.

And we all know that the only Amendment liberals hate more than the Second is the First.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Damn_Underscore posted...

@darkjedilink

Is the site committing crimes or helping its users to commit crimes? If yes, then it would justifiably be blocked (even with a net neutrality). If not, don't be surprised when every site about every political opinion is called to be blocked by some group.

Those sites aren't protested because of "illegal content," and you fucking know it.

Also, are you suggesting that every site with a political opinion ISN'T called on to be blocked? You don't think people RIGHT NOW are trying to get sites like Breitbart blocked? Are people not demanding Alex Jones and InfoWars be kicked off Facebook?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Bio1590 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

Bio1590 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

Bio1590 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

the NRA is the only organization fighting for the Second Amendment

That is absolute bullshit.

The NRA is simply the organization that has most successfully seeped into Federal and State politics.

What non-NRA-affiliated groups fought against liberal gun laws, then?

Are you actually going to do this.

Like

Actually

You're actually going to pretend you weren't just talking out of your ass again.

What? Can't find a single non-NRA-affiliated group that sued against liberal gun laws?

No, I just can't believe how actually literally stupid you are that you'd double-down on a statement you made with absolutely no basis in reality and then expect other people to do anything to appease you.

It's literally your claim I'm asking you to back up. YOU are the one who claimed that the NRA isn't the only group fighting liberal gun laws. I'm asking you to back up that assumption.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Webmaster4531 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

THERE'S NO LEGAL WAY TO STOP IT, according to the United States Constitution.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Oil_Co._v._United_States

As in the case against American Tobacco, which was decided the same day, the Court concluded that these facts were within the power of Congress to regulate under the Commerce Clause. The Court recognized that, "taken literally," the term "restraint of trade" could refer to any number of normal or usual contracts that do not harm the public. The Court embarked on a lengthy exegesis of English authorities relevant to the meaning of the term "restraint of trade." Based on this review, the Court concluded that the term "restraint of trade" had come to refer to a contract that resulted in "monopoly or its consequences." The Court identified three such consequences: higher prices, reduced output, and reduced quality.

The commerce clause literally can't apply, since no interstate commerce could be regulated. Your ISP is literally local, as regulated by law.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Bio1590 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

Bio1590 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

the NRA is the only organization fighting for the Second Amendment

That is absolute bullshit.

The NRA is simply the organization that has most successfully seeped into Federal and State politics.

What non-NRA-affiliated groups fought against liberal gun laws, then?

Are you actually going to do this.

Like

Actually

You're actually going to pretend you weren't just talking out of your ass again.

What? Can't find a single non-NRA-affiliated group that sued against liberal gun laws?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Bio1590 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

And, again, the left blocks access to content online all the time via protest. One of the first responses in this topic talked about protests demanding GoDaddy from shutting down websites of white supremacists. So, clearly, you're okay with content being blocked online, as long as it's content you don't like.

Why are you falsely equating companies hosting websites to companies connecting you to companies hosting websites?

How is it different? If it's a "free and open internet," there's no difference.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

MrPeppers posted...

darkjedilink posted...

IT LITERALLY DOESN'T AFFECT MORE PEOPLE.

It's anticipated to have SLIGHTLY more NEW CASES than all but two, this year. Significantly more people, right now, at this time, have lung cancer or colon cancer. More people die EVERY year from those two.

But the only cancer that has an "awareness month" is breast cancer. Breast cancer gets significantly more funding than pretty much other cancer research COMBINED.

THAT DISCREPANCY NEEDS TO END.

Breast cancer still has the highest prevalence of any other cancer in the US. Higher than prostate, higher than colon, higher than lung. Breast cancer also has a higher incidence than all other cancers. Thanks to cancer research, the 5 year survival for certain types of breast cancer, most notably estrogen receptor positive cancers and progestin receptor positive cancers, has significantly improved.

https://gis.cdc.gov/Cancer/USCS/DataViz.html

I think you're being dense on purpose, because you're still looking at NEW CASES, and not overall numbers. Hell, even if we just accept your numbers, less people have lung cancer, BUT FAR MORE PEOPLE DIE.

So, fuck them because they aren't women?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Bio1590 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

the NRA is the only organization fighting for the Second Amendment

That is absolute bullshit.

The NRA is simply the organization that has most successfully seeped into Federal and State politics.

What non-NRA-affiliated groups fought against liberal gun laws, then?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Damn_Underscore posted...

Blocking websites (without a good reason) goes against the spirit of free speech.

The first amendment didn't invent the idea of free speech. You're being like the SJWs who cry "the 1st amendment only applies to the government!!"

Then nobody should be allowed to take down sites run by white supremacist groups, yeah?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Tmaster148 posted...

I have a hard time believing there are actually people who want ISPs to decide what content they can view over the internet.

Like are you guys children who need someone to tell what they can and can't view?

Nobody said we "want" it. We merely acknowledge that THERE'S NO LEGAL WAY TO STOP IT, according to the United States Constitution.

And, again, the left blocks access to content online all the time via protest. One of the first responses in this topic talked about protests demanding GoDaddy from shutting down websites of white supremacists. So, clearly, you're okay with content being blocked online, as long as it's content you don't like.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

FLUFFYGERM posted...

darkjedilink posted...

But the only cancer that has an "awareness month" is breast cancer. Breast cancer gets significantly more funding than pretty much other cancer research COMBINED.

this is because we live in a gynocentric country. the west is overwhelmingly centered around women right now, due to how hard the pendulum swung from when women didn't have rights.

I'm well aware of that, which is why I'm calling that pro-breast cancer funding disparity based in sexism.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

DifferentialEquation posted...

Damn_Underscore posted...

Does the 1st amendment not also apply to the written word?

If the internet was around in the 1700s, the 1st amendment would have applied to it. That would be my ruling as a judge.

You're free to express whatever opinions you want online and the government can't punish you for it. That doesn't mean a private ISP should have to make available particular websites through their service.

As a matter of fact, such actions would be "compelled speech," which the First Amendment specifically prohibits.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Damn_Underscore posted...

Does the 1st amendment not also apply to the written word?

If the internet was around in the 1700s, the 1st amendment would have applied to it. That would be my ruling as a judge.

Nobody's arguing the First Amendment doesn't apply to the internet. We're arguing that there's literally no way to suggest that it mandates Net Neutrality.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

By my ex-wife. It's the primary reason we got a divorce.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Damn_Underscore posted...

People also have the 1st amendment right to a free internet

They literally don't. The First Amendment merely means that the government can't regulate your worldview. That has nothing to do with a free internet.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Bio1590 posted...

Also I like how we're at the point where being anti-NRA is now being anti-firearm.

As if there aren't millions of firearm owners who aren't part of the NRA.

As if there aren't firearm owners speaking out against the NRA.

Insanity.

While you have a point, the only reason there is that assumption is because the NRA is the only organization fighting for the Second Amendment, and every time the left wants to destroy the Second Amendment, they blame the NRA for it not working.

It's literally the NRA's fault the left can't violate the Constitution.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Damn_Underscore posted...

I don't think he's necessarily wrong (I wouldn't rule that way if I was a judge), but that's a great reason to make the internet a public utility

So, you're saying that, as a Supreme Court justice (meaning it's literally your job to read the Constitution and decide if something is Constitutional or not), you agree that such a thing is Constitutional, but would rule against it anyway?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

MrPeppers posted...

darkjedilink posted...

sktgamer_13dude posted...

Wow guys, people are funneling money to the most common form of cancer. Such sexism!

Lung cancer is the most common form, yet doesn't get as much money as breast cancer. You're only looking at "new cases," which skews your results.

Cardiovascular disease takes more lives than cancer...

And breast cancer gets more research funding.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

sktgamer_13dude posted...

darkjedilink posted...

sktgamer_13dude posted...

darkjedilink posted...

sktgamer_13dude posted...

Wow guys, people are funneling money to the most common form of cancer. Such sexism!

Lung cancer is the most common form, yet doesn't get as much money as breast cancer. You're only looking at "new cases," which skews your results.

>more people getting diagnosed with breast cancer than other cancers
>GUYS STOP FUNNELING MONEY TO BREAST CANCER, SEXISM!!!

Jesus Christ, just take the L already.

I never said to stop funneling the money. I said that it's absolutely fucking insane to send so much more to breast cancer when there are more people with THREE OTHER TYPES OF CANCER, and breast cancer gets MORE MONEY THAN ALL OF THEM COMBINED.

Like, are you completely illiterate? None of your sources don't even back up your posts.

Hey man, 3 cancers affect more people together than 1 cancer. Guess its time to stop funding the 1 cancer research because 3 > 1!!!! SEXISM!!!

I never argued that breast cancer was the deadliest. I said that it affects more people and, if you clicked around the links, youd see it has more new cases than the all of the other individual cancers.

Holy fuck, its like youre deliberately not reading anything I post and just LALALALALA BREAST CANCER ISNT IMPORTANT BECAUSE WOMEN

IT LITERALLY DOESN'T AFFECT MORE PEOPLE.

It's anticipated to have SLIGHTLY more NEW CASES than all but two, this year. Significantly more people, right now, at this time, have lung cancer or colon cancer. More people die EVERY year from those two.

But the only cancer that has an "awareness month" is breast cancer. Breast cancer gets significantly more funding than pretty much other cancer research COMBINED.

THAT DISCREPANCY NEEDS TO END.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Webmaster4531 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

Webmaster4531 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

Tyranthraxus posted...

You have a first amendment right to block speech.

That is a fucking impressive mental Olympic championship quality performance all categories.

That's literally what protests are all about.

The Boston Tea Party was to block free speech?

Every protest of the KKK is to block free speech.

Are you being dense on purpose, or what?

You said "what protests" not "this protest" or "what antifa protests".

Even if you meant this protest, ICE and Police are government entities.

And they don't arrest people for protesting, unless the protesters break the law.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Webmaster4531 posted...

darkjedilink posted...

Tyranthraxus posted...

You have a first amendment right to block speech.

That is a fucking impressive mental Olympic championship quality performance all categories.

That's literally what protests are all about.

The Boston Tea Party was to block free speech?

Every protest of the KKK is to block free speech.

Are you being dense on purpose, or what?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

sktgamer_13dude posted...

darkjedilink posted...

sktgamer_13dude posted...

Wow guys, people are funneling money to the most common form of cancer. Such sexism!

Lung cancer is the most common form, yet doesn't get as much money as breast cancer. You're only looking at "new cases," which skews your results.

>more people getting diagnosed with breast cancer than other cancers
>GUYS STOP FUNNELING MONEY TO BREAST CANCER, SEXISM!!!

Jesus Christ, just take the L already.

I never said to stop funneling the money. I said that it's absolutely fucking insane to send so much more to breast cancer when there are more people with THREE OTHER TYPES OF CANCER, and breast cancer gets MORE MONEY THAN ALL OF THEM COMBINED.

Like, are you completely illiterate? None of your sources don't even back up your posts.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

BWLurker posted...

Tyranthraxus posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

Ray_Dorset posted...

DifferentialEquation posted...

Fair, next. The ISPs are private companies. The 1st amendment only protects you from the government interference of free speech.

Oh wait, sorry. I forgot. That reasoning only applies when universities forbid conservative speakers from coming on campus or even when public universities give the antifa mobs free reign to shut them down with their violence.

What would your reaction to Comcast blocking Breitbart be?

I don't go to Breitbart and Comcast is not my ISP. If both of those things were true, then I would either accept it or find another ISP that allowed access to Breitbart. Either way, I wouldn't think that just because a company is doing something I don't like that the government should regulate them to do what I want. I don't have some inherent right to access a particular website and it's not a private company's to duty to ensure that I have such access.

Does a private company have a duty to allow Trump to connect to Twitter?

Nope. Trump supporters rarely understand what the right to free speech actually is

You realize that this literally backs up what Kavanaugh says, right?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Tyranthraxus posted...

You have a first amendment right to block speech.

That is a fucking impressive mental Olympic championship quality performance all categories.

That's literally what protests are all about.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

sktgamer_13dude posted...

Wow guys, people are funneling money to the most common form of cancer. Such sexism!

Lung cancer is the most common form, yet doesn't get as much money as breast cancer. You're only looking at "new cases," which skews your results.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

sktgamer_13dude posted...

darkjedilink posted...

sktgamer_13dude posted...

darkjedilink posted...

sktgamer_13dude posted...

FLUFFYGERM posted...

why is sktgamer so insistent on ignoring the obvious disparity?

Why do you hate women having rights? See, I can make stupid poss too!

Also:

https://www.cancer.gov/types/common-cancers

Hm, which one has the highest expected cases on 2018

https://tinyurl.com/FeMiNiSmIsBaD

Hmm, which cancer had the highest number of cases in 2017

Wow, maybe breast cancer is actually a threat and not just fucking feminism you fucking jokes.

Both of those links rate lung cancer (with men getting twice the number of cases as women), colon cancer (with men having a third more cases than women) and prostate cancer as having more than breast cancer.

Yet breast cancer gets more money for research than all three combined.

Those all have more deaths, but not more cases.

WOW READING IS HARD

"Those cases are deadlier, but we don't need to spend more money on them, because men don't deserve it!"

Maybe breast cancer has a low death toll because money has been pouring in to not only find a cure, but also market shit like early detection, get tested, etc.

WOW, LOGIC IS SUCH HARD

Except that's been the case literally for decades. That money flows in because feminists believe women are worth more than men.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

sktgamer_13dude posted...

darkjedilink posted...

sktgamer_13dude posted...

FLUFFYGERM posted...

why is sktgamer so insistent on ignoring the obvious disparity?

Why do you hate women having rights? See, I can make stupid poss too!

Also:

https://www.cancer.gov/types/common-cancers

Hm, which one has the highest expected cases on 2018

https://tinyurl.com/FeMiNiSmIsBaD

Hmm, which cancer had the highest number of cases in 2017

Wow, maybe breast cancer is actually a threat and not just fucking feminism you fucking jokes.

Both of those links rate lung cancer (with men getting twice the number of cases as women), colon cancer (with men having a third more cases than women) and prostate cancer as having more than breast cancer.

Yet breast cancer gets more money for research than all three combined.

Those all have more deaths, but not more cases.

WOW READING IS HARD

"Those cases are deadlier, but we don't need to spend more money on them, because men don't deserve it!"
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Anarchy_Juiblex posted...

darkjedilink posted...

spikethedevil posted...

So why aren't alt righ rally groups arrested?

Can you name a time where they are actually breaking the law and not arrested?

Well this doesn't qualify as "not arrested" but Trump just pardoned a bunch of the Bundy takeover scumbags.

He pardoned the people who's arrest started that stuff.

The people who actually committed the takeover were all exonerated or had their charges dropped because the government fucked up and lied about it.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

spikethedevil posted...

So why aren't alt righ rally groups arrested?

Can you name a time where they are actually breaking the law and not arrested?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

Deadpool_18 posted...

Who did she say she loved...?

Someone named Brady.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

sktgamer_13dude posted...

FLUFFYGERM posted...

why is sktgamer so insistent on ignoring the obvious disparity?

Why do you hate women having rights? See, I can make stupid poss too!

Also:

https://www.cancer.gov/types/common-cancers

Hm, which one has the highest expected cases on 2018

https://tinyurl.com/FeMiNiSmIsBaD

Hmm, which cancer had the highest number of cases in 2017

Wow, maybe breast cancer is actually a threat and not just fucking feminism you fucking jokes.

Both of those links rate lung cancer (with men getting twice the number of cases as women), colon cancer (with men having a third more cases than women) and prostate cancer as having more than breast cancer.

Yet breast cancer gets more money for research than all three combined.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

rikasa posted...

I love the men who think feminism should be giving men more stuff. If you want male shelters, paternity leave, and prostate cancer awareness do it yourselves. Women won't stop you.

Women don't finance any of that stuff themselves. They expect the government to provide all of that for them.

Again, despite the fact that prostate cancer kills almost double the number of people breast cancer does, the government spends WAAAAAAY more money on breast cancer.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

FLUFFYGERM posted...

why is sktgamer so insistent on ignoring the obvious disparity?

Because he's a modern feminist, and the only disparities they care about are the ones that women get the short end of.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

16-BITTER posted...

Men can get breast cancer though

Right, but at nowhere near the same level as women. The two types of cancer that are above breast cancer that I alluded to also can be contracted by women.

Also, I'd LOVE to see a single ad for breast cancer awareness or breast cancer research donations that didn't talk about women. I've seen ones that mention men getting it as kind of a footnote, like "oh, and did you know men have a microscopically small chance of getting it, too?" but I've never seen one that talked specifically about men getting breast cancer.
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen

AlecSkorpio posted...

Did that Antifa person yell out race traitor?

Y
I
K
E
S

Wait - you bought the leftist lie that such a comment was reserved for use by white supremacists?
---

'It's okay that those gangbangers stole all my personal belongings and cash at gunpoint, cuz they're building a rec center!' - OneTimeBen