Lurker > hockeydude15

I think he has mentioned before that he doesn't really like doing the panel. Maybe not that directly but like that he isn't comfortable doing it or something and since GB doesn't take the whole crew to pax anymore he just opts to sit them out. Budget reasons probably help that since it doesn't make much sense to spend that much money on someone for what is essentially just that panel, the rest of the duders are usually on more than just that.
---

Yawn

LeonhartFour posted...

Obtained. Thanks to the alert.

---

Yawn

Reverse Crawl looks interesting.
---

Yawn

Whole bunch of "get of my lawn" people in this topic.
---

Yawn

As soon as you hit the B button it will cancel out after that "round" is completed. So either you are exaggerating on how many hits happened since depending on who you are facing it can go 2 against 1 for 2 against for a round or you weren't hitting the "B" button when you started to panic. Like maybe you were mashing the "A" button by accident, regardless the game didn't screw up.

Also as someone who has lost way to many hours to the arena in FE games and have done both of the things above yea it sucks.
---

Yawn

jcgamer107 posted...

Did anyone actually pick any of the remaining 4 teams to win it all? (in their original bracket) I'd be impressed.

I have France winning the whole thing which....might actually happen.
---

Yawn

KCF0107 posted...

Arc the Lad: Twilight of the Spirits has a pretty awful final boss

---

Yawn

When I was a kid I remember Arc the Lad Twilight of the Spirits' final dungeon being terrible capped off by a final boss fight that jumped the difficulty up to an insane amount all while having you at a save point that was a point of no return. Not really sure if it was really that bad or if I was just terrible at the game though.
---

Yawn

turbopuns2 posted...

While typing this I realized...I guess my copy would have buffed at the end of my opponent's turn, and not mine? Yeah that's probably it...was thinking it was just bugged. Either way that was a bit of a letdown when he just killed it with his truesilver and I thought I was playing effectively a 5/5.

I've heard of this before and it's a bug. If your opponent didn't yours it would have did the triggering animation like it was going to be buffed at the end of his turn but still remained as a 4/4. Whether Blizzard wants it to work like you and I expect it to or at the end of your opponents turn, currently it is doing neither or it at least has been like that as of like a month ago when I read about it.
---

Yawn

UltimaterializerX posted...

hockeydude15 posted...

UltimaterializerX posted...

https://hsreplay.net/replay/RaxqMW5YUM2aTq5tcADnnZ

Turn 7, clear the board with meteor and you win, yes it was that easy. Like not only did you not do the correct play by clearing his board while you could, you literally set yourself up to have a nothing turn 8.

I was saving Meteor for later. Clearing his board to face with a 4/6 isnt good value.

For what? You are running a stupid amount of removal and had 2 other forms of big removal already in your had with blizzard for a board clear/stall. What type of value are you looking for in meteor to do? It literally kills a 6 health and 3 health minion and allows a 3rd to be killed off by 1/1's.
---

Yawn

UltimaterializerX posted...

https://hsreplay.net/replay/RaxqMW5YUM2aTq5tcADnnZ

Turn 7, clear the board with meteor and you win, yes it was that easy. Like not only did you not do the correct play by clearing his board while you could, you literally set yourself up to have a nothing turn 8.
---

Yawn

I have checks on everything but Morocco and Iran because I got them wrong. So yea they screwed up with Egypt and Saudi then because I also have those wrong but they have checks as if I got them correct.
---

Yawn

Emeraldegg posted...

It's also misleading because the "38 for getting the entire group in the correct order" as it reads only actually applies to 1/2. Myself and others are perfect despite not getting egypt/saudi in the correct order.

I think they just screwed up with egypt/saudi because I have Spain and Portugal perfect but swapped Iran and Morocco and i'm behind the group that is "perfect".
---

Yawn

Mage is like the 4th best class in arena right now. Just because you are bad at playing around boardclears doesnt make them broken.
---

Yawn

HotDogButts posted...

The shooting wasn't necessary, but it's pretty hard to get up in arms about a drive-by suspect, in a car with bullet holes in it, running from the cops, who ditched a gun on the floor of the car, had an empty clip on him and gun residue on his hands, getting wrongfully shot by the cops.

If you don't want to get killed by cops don't participate in a murder. We literally have people protesting and crying over a murderer.

---

Yawn

Almost like you shouldn't do drive by shootings. But that's besides the point i guess.
---

Yawn

So I was just checking on how much T8 gear would cost in Dragon Coins while i made my weekly rep buy and noticed that for about 400k you can buy a T8 Legendary Gear Ticket. Looks like you can buy only 4 but that's still 4 pieces of perfect T8 gear you can get.

Not sure if anyone here noticed or knew that but it was a decent surprise to me.
---

Yawn

I'd bet I could go 7 out of 10 against Ulti, 9 out of 10 if it was arena.
---

Yawn

charmander6000 posted...

How long do they have to wait before they can purge?

The law in Ohio which brought this case is that after 2 years of not voting in any election a notice is sent to the address on file to confirm they are still living there. If the person don't send back that notice and doesn't vote in any election for another 4 years after that then they are removed and have to reregister. So you have to no vote in any election for 6 straight years before you have to register again to vote. Law seems fair enough IMO it's just now that something like this has passed the supreme court I'd expect way shittier versions of that law in places to suppress voters.
---

Yawn

Where are you seeing all these changes that are going to be made?
---

Yawn

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

Did he say what his problem was?

He said Fallout is all about the isolation for him and it seems one based around playing with others isn't what he is looking for, also probably no VATS.
---

Yawn

CoolCly posted...

The Starfield tease was fine, but announcing TES6 with no details and without even giving us the subtitle is pretty weak

I mean I understand why they had to do that. If they don't even mention TES6 the first thing that is said once the conference is over is what about TES6?!?! At least now they acknowledged they are working on it and that it will be AFTER w/e starfield is.
---

Yawn

This is great, i was really hoping they would bring out Andrew WK.
---

Yawn

More Ori is a good thing.
---

Yawn

Being a better Destiny would be fine to me, but man everything that is being shown was shown last year. Having literally nothing new to show over a year is not good.
---

Yawn

How something can be "pre-alpha" and yet be playable online in any capacity makes no sense to me.
---

Yawn

That said, I might actually play this.
---

Yawn

Was about to say EA has been pretty good so far. Been moving fast through the games and haven't really dragged on the sports and then.....shoutcasters for a mobile game...
---

Yawn

Mega Mana posted...

tazzyboyishere posted...

Not all of them, but probably most.

---

Yawn

Adept
---

Yawn

Emeraldegg posted...

Ainoxi posted...

Just uninstalled Rocket League this week due to getting sick of having to mute toxic people just about every. single. match. Its always been an issue with RL, but coming back to it after a few months off it seems like it has gotten much worse.
And I only play unranked and Rumble, so I can't imagine how bad people get on the competitive site.

Although the T-Rex goal explosion might get me to reinstall. Dammit Psyonix.

I always just go through and mute everyone to start every match and have never enjoyed RL more, in terms of random matchmaking.

I pretty much only play competitive and rarely see someone be toxic. I mean you get the "nice save" when you make a fool of yourself and let an easy goal in but hardly ever more than that.

Anyway on topic FF8 is the only thing i can remember. Was in the mindset that i was not liking it and just wanted to get it over with and then got to the castle? that takes away your battle actions or something like that and just said it wasn't worth the hassle to continue.
---

Yawn

Zigzagoon posted...

https://i.redd.it/ggxla2jeuoz01.jpg

Is it sad that the actual odds are even worse than this?

Has anyone here got anything besides the gold or hearts? I can spin 3-4 times a day usually and that is all i've gotten so far.
---

Yawn

UltimaterializerX posted...

Then they're idiots who deny facts: https://science.house.gov/news/press-releases/former-noaa-scientist-confirms-colleagues-manipulated-climate-records

Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas): I thank Dr. John Bates for courageously stepping forward to tell the truth about NOAAs senior officials playing fast and loose with the data in order to meet a politically predetermined conclusion

Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Darin LaHood (R-Ill.): I applaud Dr. Batess efforts in uncovering the truth of this data manipulation...

Dr. Bates after the hearing in interviews: "The issue here is not an issue of tampering with data, but rather really of timing of a release of a paper that had not properly disclosed everything it was"

"These types of statements by policymakers that attempt to take one study/dispute and blow it out of proportion are both unhelpful and misleading," he wrote. "We will be working with the science committee to demonstrate the scientific consensus on climate change and to encourage them not to interfere with the scientific process."
---

Yawn

UltimaterializerX posted...

Skip to my turn 6 and try telling me that it's proof I was outplayed. I had a totem up, so there was a 33% chance to get a spell damage totem. Didn't happen. Then I cast Lightning Storm and got the 25% "2 damage to both minions" roll. 8.25% chance for that sequence of events.

Regardless of the outcome of what you did it was the wrong play. Trading the 4/2 and playing fire ele gives you 3 damage to face and a board of 3/1 and 6/5 with enough removal to deal with anything he plays next turn. That's pretty much game over right there. The only time your play is better is if you get the spell power totem and highroll the damage on it, but even then you are setting yourself up to not be able to fire ele next turn because of the overload.

Another misplay imo is on the next turn. You draw drake which against his small health board is a great turn 8 but it also makes your panther dead. Not knowing what he has I would have killed the taunt with tidal surge just so it lets your panther do something next turn, either go face or take out a minion with more than 2 health. Just toteming there does nothing but negate 2 damage. Then you don't play drake when you really needed to, i'll stop there i guess unless you want me to go on.
---

Yawn

Tony firmly on the stance of don't use lethal force on someone unless they are actively shooting other people i guess.
---

Yawn

BowserCuffs posted...

Not particularly, no, but nice strawman.

You and Kenri both say this but have yet to say when it is ok to shoot someone besides that. Kenri literally thinks you shouldn't shoot someone who is actively pointing a gun at someone in public. Like i'm at the point that even just make a situation up that you think it would be ok to use deadly force before the person fires first because so far all of these real life situations so far are a no.

How about that one woman cop who was almost beaten to death by someone on K2 who refused to shoot the guy for fear of bad press for everyone involved. Do you think deadly force was ok to use there?
---

Yawn

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

Bruh it was over a year before the Las Vegas shooting, lol please take a seat my friend.

The dude was drunk as fuck and they were having him CRAWL FORWARD WITH HIS LEGS CROSSED AND ARMS UP while wearing gym shorts that you can see are falling down.

Please, get drunk and try this.

Remember, if you fuck up you're dead.

No pressure.

Cops asked if they were drunk they said no. After each instruction he was asked if he understood and he said yes. The cops even said that if he is to fall not to bring his hands down and asks if he understands and he says yes. He brings his hands down the cops warn him if he does it again they will shoot him. He immediately does it again.
---

Yawn

Both Bowser and Kenri pretty much think that cops should have to be shot at before they can shoot.
---

Yawn

Corrik posted...

Guy drops hands to waistline. He is yelled at and told if he does it again they will kill him. Guy drops his hands to waistline again. A different cop than the one who says it shoots the man upon doing so.

ftfy
---

Yawn

No you see the judges are rigged to always be in favor of the cops, so is the DA. Also all the experts that were brought that said it didn't break the law, those must have been paid off. Don't forget when these cases go to a Grand Jury and it doesn't get past that either, the civilians doing their civic duty were also in on the con for cops to kill whoever they want. Perfectly reasonable.
---

Yawn

Then i guess you are going to live your life in some irrational fear that police will shoot you for no reason. Not really much else to say.
---

Yawn

How about don't go into public waving around things that look exactly like guns because might think they are actually guns in a country that has a mass shooting every month it seems? You are really saying that is too much to ask?
---

Yawn

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

I don't want Cops to die.

But if the options are

"1% of the time, a cop dies"

or

"1% o the time, an innocent civilian dies" (especially a kid like Tamir Rice),

Well, the Cop made a choice to put their life on the line, so I think the choice is clear.

But most of the time the "innocent" civilian put themselves in the situation in the first place. Take Tamir Rice, the kid wasn't just waving around a toy gun in a public area but with an air soft gun that was made to look like a real gun with the orange tip of it that is suppose to show it is a toy not on it. To put a cop in that situation and expect him to risk his life even more by assuming that the kid won't hurt him and the gun isn't real is crazy imo.
---

Yawn

Kenri posted...

Exactly, no one can know what was going on in the guy's head for sure, yet you're claiming you do know (that he could have been a killer) and you're defending a police officer who thought he knew well enough to kill the guy.

Do you think the cops who shot him should be on trial for murder or another crime?
---

Yawn

StealThisSheen posted...

Eddv posted...

If a cop shoots someone without just cause they absolutely should be held accountable.

All of the wrangling is over what "just cause" is for cops. Bowser is saying that they should absolutely be held to a high standard on that point.

If that's what he meant, then sure, I agree

I was confused because he replied to a post saying there are different standards for when a cop is pointing a gun at somebody opposed to a normal person pointing a gun at somebody, which there are and should be.

If you get into shooting somebody without cause, then obviously that changes.

^^^
---

Yawn

Kenri posted...

hockeydude15 posted...

Like I don't even get to where you can say you knew the guy wasn't going to kill anyone even if he had a gun, what are you actually basing that on?

Because it's a hypothetical scenario where the only thing that changed is that he has a gun instead of a pipe. Why would just that make him into a killer?

I just don't get why you think you know what was going on in that guys head. I don't know if it was a gun instead that he wouldn't have shot it but for some reason you think you know exactly what was going through the mind of someone who was holding a pipe that was shaped like a gun and pointing it at people in public.
---

Yawn

BowserCuffs posted...

hockeydude15 posted...

Cops absolutely get special treatment in this regard.

And this is part of the problem.
As arbiters of the law, they should be held to higher standards, not lower standards, than your average civilian.

That makes absolutely no sense in the context i put it in. Are you saying that cops under no circumstance can pull their weapon on someone? Or do you disagree that in order for cops to properly do their job some laws don't affect them (which btw in every case of this are legally stated what cops can and can't do and isn't just making things up as it goes.)
---

Yawn