Lurker > muchdran

If you dont tip, youre robbing the service staff. Plain and simple.

The lesser of two very shitty options. Would have been happier with a win from Johnson or Stein, but we all know that would never have happened.

But can we please get some better options, on both sides, in 2020? Either that or a third-party win - no matter how obscure, weird or messed up the party is - as a wakeup call to the two major ones to stop being so extreme and ridiculous?

Tariff wars are a waste of time for everyone involved.

Patty_Fleur posted...

gunplagirl posted...

Patty_Fleur posted...

Liberals pushing stupid shit like gender neutral pronouns and victim hood is why Trump is President.

Blame them. Not Trump.

"I can't be racist, sexist, transphobic or insult others for being disabled without facing backlash"

Sounds like the issue is that you're a terrible person and rather than taking time to consider that maybe you're offensive, you get angry and voted for Trump. Worse yet, rather than acknowledging it was your choice, you blame the people you've victimized.

Basically, it's the same type of logic as that "I only beat you because you messed up" excuse that an abuser gives to their partner. Rather than acknowledging their anger problem or that they chose to do so, they blame their victim by saying the victim deserved it and brought it on themselves.

I didn't even vote. What the fuck is wrong with you? This is the shit I'm talking about. That's why Trump won.

You agree with me, then? That people who refuse to be politically correct willingly voted for trump as an attempt at harming minorities.

This is fucking gold.

The black woman in question, Lillian Green, works as an "equity activist" for the Oregon department of education.

So Oregon tax dollars are being used to pay people to be professional SJWs.

frozenshock posted...

The value of a human being is not dependent on their contribution to society.

This. By OP's reasoning, babies, children, disabled people, freelance artists, retired people, students, and stay-at-home parents are all negatives on society.

Furthermore, not all employed people make positive societal contributions. A guy who jacks off all day is less of a negative on society than a cigarette factory worker.

Dash_Harber posted...

Initially, I wouldn't be surprised and I'd probably feel some sort of catharsis seeing it after all the harm he has done. Realistically, though, that is one of the worst ways to remove him from power. They need to remove him from office legally and in a way that doesn't make him look like a martyr. If they forced him out, it would only radicalize his supporters and invite foreign countries to play powermonger in America.

This is the insanity of the radical left perfectly encapsulated tbh. Literally ok with the idea of a violent coup to overthrow the President occurring.

It depends.
If they're leftist and/or primarily composed of minorities, the police and military response will be swift and brutal.
If it's rightist(LOL, but we're spit-balling here), not much would be done until people got killed.

up

littlebro07 posted...

Move.

I pay $1250 a month for mortgage (principal, interest, property tax, home insurance, PMI) and utilities. It's an 1800sqft 3 bed 3 bath house with attached two car garage.

Why people willingly choose to live somewhere that you need to earn six figures to be considered not in poverty has always confused me but then again I've never tried it out myself. Maybe the pros of living there outweigh the cons of how much it costs.

Most people cannot just up and move.

You also compromise a lot to live in the less expensive areas of the U.S. In the more rural, less modernized areas you sacrifice food, culture, niche friends (like an astronomy club or D&D club), conveniences, entertainment, better job opportunities, etc.

Those things aren't a big deal to everyone, but to a lot of people they are.

Another she-said allegation

Without proof none of this shit matters.

I don't get it

GameGodOfAll posted...

Shuto-uke posted...

MakoReizei posted...

Men shouldn't cry openly unless they lost a loved one or a pet

The way I see it:

- Death or serious disease of a loved one or pet
- Job loss or financial issues
- Something extreme such as getting shot or getting sliced by a sharp sword or power tool

^ those are acceptable

Imagine having a list of things you're able to be emotional about.

I don't really ever cry, but Jesus to think of it as something you have to justify.

I know I know SJW and modern feminism and all that crap, but "toxic masculinity" is 100% a real thing in society and shit's sad. It's like being programmed.

You can be very emotional without crying.

And yes, this is totally toxic masculinity, but sadly I can't change it, I just know society judges us by that standard

This whole "left eating itself" nonsense really tickles me. Because democrats can make criticism of other democrats, that's a terrible thing. Better to blindly follow, no matter what. Party before integrity, that's the main thing.