Lurker > _REDDIT_

They don't need to sex or anything, but part of the problem is the lack of giving them a chance. I think they should have to agree to one date

Then, if the girl is still uninterested, the guy has to take a hint. But not before given a chance IMO

It's your own damn fault for watching Broadcast TV, you dinosaur

It works on Boomers (the dumbest generation in world history) but not so much on Millennials

I only watch it on airplanes

I got bored of Nick and Schmidt, honestly. The two chicks (Zoe and the exotic girl) are smoking tho

What's the point? 10-15 years ago this contest drew 100k votes. Nowadays polls barely get 10k. Rallies will influence the contest.

I love and support Trump but strategically speaking, he needs to STFU about anything healthcare related.

Most of the people at my "Don't Tread On Me" club love Trump soooooo......

Just because a girl is engaged to you doesn't mean she is "locked down"

This situation is a great clarion call to not get your relationship get stale, and treat your fiance with love and respect. Roy did not do that so he rightfully lost Pam.

You should need 300 karma before you are allowed to post images

BruceWayneJr posted...

Here:

https://trump.dating/
https://trumpsingles.com/

Now shut up.

No. Those sites are 90% male and there are very few cute 20-29 year olds on there.

Why are accounts with 3 karma allowed to post images? Is the adminstration stupid?

SquirrelyDan posted...

_REDDIT_ posted...

It just doesn't seem fair that a traditional, salt-of-the-earth freedom loving Trump supporter like myself gets less tail than some latte-sipping liberal pajama boy.

Go after the Trump supporter chicks. You'll enjoy each other more if you have more in common. That's typically how it works irl. Stop feeling entitled. Want what you can't have, but realize everyone has preferences that may exclude you just as you may exclude them.

There are very few cute girls 20-29 that support Trump, unfortunately.

BJ-blazkowics posted...

@_REDDIT_ posted...

It just doesn't seem fair that a traditional, salt-of-the-earth freedom loving Trump supporter like myself gets less tail than some latte-sipping liberal pajama boy.

because you dislike minorities. You're chopping a huge block off the population right off the bat

I don't dislike minorities. I dislike pushing diversity for the sake of pushing diversity. Why make a Ghostbusters movie with women? Ghostbusters are men. And I hear the next James Bond might be black. WTF?

I hated how terrible grass was. Seemed unfair. Weak against so many types

It just doesn't seem fair that a traditional, salt-of-the-earth freedom loving Trump supporter like myself gets less tail than some latte-sipping liberal pajama boy.

So if I say on Tinder "no black girls" I'm a racist/monster etc

But if a girl says "No Trump voters", she gets off scott free?

How is this fair?

Is it fair that conservatives are discriminated against (compared to liberals and apathetic people)?

pegusus123456 posted...

St0rmFury posted...

Turbam posted...

Ariel is so fucking dumb.
Ursula was all "hey, it's happened a few times but people couldn't uphold their end so I turned them into these weed things"

Her cave was fucking filled with them! She should have known something was up

She's in love.

With a dude she's seen one time and never spoken to, she's dumb as hell

Clearly you know nothing about twu wuv

Big_Nabendu posted...

_REDDIT_ posted...

SauI_Goodman posted...

A lot of women are attracted to losers. Why, for the life of me I'll never understand. The ones that really confuse me are the older ones. I get younger girls thinking they're in love with a dumbass but there are women in their 40's and higher who are still in this stage.

I asked a female friend of mine why she prefers to date losers/deadbeats, even if the loser is LESS attractive than the successful person. Her response? Intelligent/successful guys "intimidate" her.

That's the dumbest thing I ever read

Maybe, but imagine you meet some powerful Wall Street lawyer chick. Are you going to ask her out? Probably not

Up

SimpleMan - 155
Samurai - 157
thron - 167
Doc - 169
Darkprince - 140
Tupacruz - 178

TeaMilk - 139
Thycorndog - 154

Saul - 139
Mabus - 221
Dash - 115

LeoRyan - 139
UncleDrew - 165

Johny Nutcase - 185
TomNook - 133
fnkdlk - 142

go

I'm liberal and I'm fine with requiring voter ID

HOWEVER, it should be quick and easy (free) for anyone to get.

In Austria, a liberal country, everyone has Voter ID

Orlando_Jordan posted...

Agreed. If you aren't pulling 35K by age 20, you've failed to grow up.

It means you have until 25 to get a job that pays 35k. Shouldn't be that hard in all honesty

SauI_Goodman posted...

A lot of women are attracted to losers. Why, for the life of me I'll never understand. The ones that really confuse me are the older ones. I get younger girls thinking they're in love with a dumbass but there are women in their 40's and higher who are still in this stage.

I asked a female friend of mine why she prefers to date losers/deadbeats, even if the loser is LESS attractive than the successful person. Her response? Intelligent/successful guys "intimidate" her.

If you aren't making enough money for your age, you need to do some reevaluating of your life. Hopefully this serves as a wakeup call

AGE - MINIMUM SALARY

20-25 = $35,000
26-30 = $40,000
31-35 = $55,000
36-40 = $60,000
40-49 = $70,000
50+ = $80,000

Dante 66%
Lightning 66%
Chun-Li 66%
Ganondorf 66%
Vivi 66%
Victor Sullivan 55%
Donkey Kong 55%
Leon Kennedy 66%

Zero 77%
Zidane Tribal 55%
Noctis Lucis Caelum 55%
Monika 55%
Yoshi 77%
Velvet Crowe 55%
Pikachu 66%
Kratos 66%

Sora 66%
Pokemon Trainer Red 66%
Cecil Harvey 66%
Big Boss 55%
Alucard v55%
Yuna 66%
Kefka 55%
Kazuma Kiryu 55%

2B 66%
Ness 55%
Charizard 66%
Bowser 66%
Chris Redfield 55%
Ike 77%
Estelle Bright 55%
Kirby 66%

Why go to a bar on a Wednesday night?

I went to college after high school, dormed up, immediately starting paying for rent via part time job and since University I have been working and living on my own

There is really no excuse to live with your parents unless you are lazy or have mental problems like learning disabilities

*17-40 year old virgins

Normal people don't care

Would Stalin have then more or less sided with Hitler? And they would have won WW2?

up

Yes, I liken rallies to vultures who circle nearly dead animals

Back in the Golden Day of contests when we had 100k votes, rallies were promptly negated and rendered a waste of time. GameFAQs was too powerful to be sullied by rallies

But now? GameFAQs is at Deaths Door and isnold and frail and sickly. We are lucky to get 10k votals now. As a result, we are ripe for the plucking when the vultures (rallies) come after s

I hate fatties so Im a lot more lenient with faces as long as the body is fit/slim

stone posted...

And how much tv does she watch in a week?

Honestly, very little. She works hard at her new lawyer job at a law firm

Is this fair? She says I need to behave more like an adult.

She also gives me "video game tokens". For example, if I do something good (clean the kitchen, get a new client, go to dinner with her parents), she gives me a "token" (looks like a pog) and it allows me an additional 15 minutes of video game time.

I'm curious

Under CjayC polls got 100k votes

Today, they are lucky to break 10k. We're witnessing the end of the life of GameFAQs IMO

No serious person actually thought Dante was going to beat a Zelda character anyways

There is really no excuse for a college educated male to have less than 10k in the bank

Of course interest is lessened - this site is much older now. An internet poll popularity contest shouldnt excite a 30 year old grown man as much as it would a 16 year old wayward teenager. Plus, with low votals this will only be a Draven-esque fiasco

All I'm saying is... I've seen websites in third-world countries that have more votals than GameFAQs. Yesterday's poll didn't even hit 10,000! What happened to GameFAQs?

Polls have been struggling to reach a meager 10,000 votes as of late. I remember when polls in the golden days of the contests got over 100,000 votes. I mean, jesus, even back in 2002 we were getting 60,000 votes.

With the vote totals as pathetic as they are, do you not realize how damn easy it is to rally?

It's sad to see how much GameFAQs has decayed. This never would have happened under CJayC