Lurker > Laserion

Kombucha posted...

They sell some kind of reflective tint to cut down on cooling, I've seen it in hardware stores. Maybe that's what it is? Or is it actually like straight up reflective material jammed into the windows?

The glass is normal glass. It actually looks like they affixed the aforementioned car shade, or the interior lining of a cooler, to the window. It didn't look like that when the owners lived there, about 1.5 years ago.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

The house in front of mine has this. The windows are covered in some reflective material from the inside, like aluminum foil or those foldable windshield shades. I think they are renting from the people who lived there before.

We have blinds, which I close when the sun is coming in from that side, but I open when the sun moves.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Such stamina! How?!
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

From the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:

A towel, it says, is about the most massively useful thing an interstellar hitchhiker can have. Partly it has great practical value -- you can wrap it around you for warmth as you bound across the cold moons of Jaglan Beta; you can lie on it on the brilliant marble sanded beaches of Santraginus V, inhaling the heady sea vapours; you can sleep under it beneath the stars which shine so redly on the desert world of Kakrafoon; use it to sail a mini raft down the slow heavy river Moth; wet it for use in hand-tohand-combat; wrap it round your head to ward off noxious fumes or to avoid the gaze of the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal (a mindboggingly stupid animal, it assumes that if you can't see it, it can't see you -- daft as a bush, but very ravenous); you can wave your towel in emergencies as a distress signal, and of course dry yourself off with it if it still seems to be clean enough.

More importantly, a towel has immense psychological value. For some reason, if a strag (strag: non-hitchhiker) discovers that a hitchhiker has his towel with him, he will automatically assume that he is also in possession of a toothbrush, face flannel, soap, tin of biscuits, flask, compass, map, ball of string, gnat spray, wet weather gear, space suit etc., etc. Furthermore, the strag will then happily lend the hitchhiker any of these or a dozen other items that the hitchhiker might accidentally have "lost". What the strag will think is that any man who can hitch the length and breadth of the galaxy, rough it, slum it, struggle against terrible odds, win through, and still knows where his towel is is clearly a man to be reckoned with.

Hence a phrase which has passed into hitch hiking slang, as in "Hey, you sass that hoopy Ford Prefect? There's a frood who really knows where his towel is." (Sass: know, be aware of, meet, have sex with; hoopy: really together guy; frood: really amazingly together guy.)

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Trump probably has never had to buy anything in person, or has never used cash to do it.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

matty_s posted...

His abnormally long penis stretched her?

Didnt know thats how length worked

Yeah.
* formerly tight, now stretched
* abnormally long penis

It would make more sense if she said "wide" instead of "long".
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

9, 6 and 4.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Soylent Red is made of algae.
Soylent Green is made of people! It's people!
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

There is one where the guy narrates events, but they haven't happened. They happen to the cops as he tells them.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Middle hope posted...

Watch the guys family try to sue the people who had their house broken into

The window was totally safe when I left home. He made it unsafe by breaking it, and then proceeded to use it unsafely when getting out.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

SSJCAT posted...

the fix was just as lazy,

but lol its cake you eat it

What? Considering what they had to work with, and so little time before the guests arrived, it turned out pretty well.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

KBGiantsfan posted...

On a flat Earth, the shadow that is cast by each would be of the same length. However, if you and your friend compare notes, you'll find that one shadow was longer than the other. That's because, due to the curvature of Earth, the sun will hit one part of Earth at one angle and another part of Earth at a different angle even at the same time of day.

You're not taking into account that on a flat earth, the sun is just a 30-mile-wide disc at 3000 miles above the surface. Things directly bellow it have very short or no shadow, while things 3000 miles away from below would receive sunlight ar 45. Same as what would be seen on a round earth 24,000 miles around, at noon above and a different longitude 45 away (~3000 miles away) where it's 3 hours earlier or later (~9 am or 3 pm), from parallel rays from a huge sun very far away.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

So, from now on, what should armed security guards do next time a bad guy with a gun starts shooting?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

In that ad for Sailor Moon, what did they mean by "More Pretty Soldiers than you can you can shake a wand at!"?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Is Borat based on Mahir Cagri?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Local copy is the best copy when internet sucks.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

We don't use sheets (except for the fitted sheet) when freaking. They get in the way, so we throw them to a corner.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Where is that guy who just put on his headphones? I want to hear the story again!
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

She's just jealous the childfree couple can actually enjoy the rides together, instead of looking out for their kids.
She only mentions "joy and happiness" once, and "exhaustion" like over 9,000 times.
This was posted before. A lot of people agreed that it looks made-up.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

One day you're going to get your car zip-tied to a cart.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

frozenshock posted...

Ultima Dragon posted...

It wouldn't matter, the rear-ender is always 100% at fault since they will be deemed as following too close to stop safely according to the driving conditions. Even if the person slammed on their brakes to be a jackass, doesn't matter. You need to leave enough space.

Err.... brake checking is kind of illegal, you know? If you're on tape brake checking a tailgater and it causes a crash, you're in shit.

Can't you just say that a puppy jumped out of the bushes, and you didn't want to hit it?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

*salutes at

Corporal Punishment.

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

What?! Are we living in Final Destination now?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

What about non-Muslim non-white people? Those are OK to her?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Someone send him a copy of this topic.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Ban crazy people.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

On Android, any folder with an empty file called .nomedia is skipped for thumbnails in the gallery display. I don't know about iOS.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Jeff K

yuo got hotmale!

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

What did you expect? Americans call flippybreads "pancakes"...
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

They have a secret zipper compartment where they store their toys.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

*looks up images*
Like a Zentradi Spaceturd.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

I had problems understanding your sentence. Perhaps use hyphens:
ssj3vegeta_ posted...

I want to you-know-what to her

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Carlbertomfg posted...

This is the way!

I had a good feeling!
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Board 214 stuff.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

*used
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

So, they are into animal stuff?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Wasn't "lovefisting PiOL" a term here for some time?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

theAteam posted...

Mows the lawn at the same time. It's called efficiency, Charles.

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

I saw a video or two, by Llama Art, with the voice of Mr. Nightmare, with stories similar to this.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Leanaunfurled posted...

What happens when a piano almost falls on you and you jumping back causes you to trip over a stray stroller that just happened to be behind you and your phone plops in the lap of the kid in the stroller and the kid in the stroller throws a fit over all the noise and movement and tosses your phone and your phone cracks because you didn't have a case on it?

lol Who's laughing now??

Git gudder at avoiding pianos.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Someone has never handled a garden hose.
---
I gorgot:

Checkmate, flat-earthers!

---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Well, now it changes the time of every post. I posted at 3 pm (DST), but when I check it the next day, it will say it was at 2pm (Standard Time). Really messes up alibis!
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

ChainedRedone posted...

Laserion posted...

ChainedRedone posted...

I'm not that desperate that I'm going to flip out on a girl for that. It's just sex. It's nice to know that you think raping her would have been the alpha non-cuck thing to do.

Leaving her and looking for someone else who does want you is rape?

Leaving what, exactly? Do you get emotionally attached to every girl you hook up with or something?

My question is in reference to this:
ChainedRedone posted...

It's nice to know that you think raping her would have been the alpha non-cuck thing to do.

Why did you bring up rape?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

ChainedRedone posted...

I'm not that desperate that I'm going to flip out on a girl for that. It's just sex. It's nice to know that you think raping her would have been the alpha non-cuck thing to do.

Leaving her and looking for someone else who does want you is rape?
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Do you mean "clitoris"?
Anyway, "dry humping" is with clothes on. If you are rubbing your glans to her clitoris, you would probably eventually start lubricating, making her clit wet. You two could have gotten off doing just that, without penetration. You could have proposed that instead. Oh, well. Next time.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

Disruptive posting.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

All my dungeon cells will have very bright LED illumination. Reduce the chance of hiding makeshift weapons and stuff in the darkness. Same with my spaceships. None if this "dark hallways" shit.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

That's how @fenderbender321 got his username.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".

The obvious move is to apply to be a cashier.
---

There is no "would of", "should of" or "could of".
There is "would've", "should've" and "could've".