Lurker > DiaDhuit

Thanks

And I dont have to register for an account

Unbreakable posted...

DiaDhuit posted...

Unbreakable posted...

DiaDhuit posted...

Unbreakable posted...

@DiaDhuit

Heres a safe space for you, buddy

Lets make a wager on whose account get suspended first. Loser cant make a new one for a month.

Unlike you, I don't care if I lose accounts. Besides, my main is still open. Yours....
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.4.user=Hey

I dont see a user level on that. Hey has transcended banning. Another sign from this site that I am destined to be a mod.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.4.user=Acceleration
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.4.user=Kinetics

Once the petition goes through those will be overturned.

0AbsoluteZero0 posted...

Unbreakable posted...

DiaDhuit posted...

Unbreakable posted...

@DiaDhuit

Heres a safe space for you, buddy

Lets make a wager on whose account get suspended first. Loser cant make a new one for a month.

Unlike you, I don't care if I lose accounts. Besides, my main is still open. Yours....
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.4.user=Hey

I still laugh when I think of the fact that Hey got banned for posting someones phone number. And then he tried to claim that it was just a random string of numbers

Hey was a pure and venerable soul. He would never dox.

Unbreakable posted...

DiaDhuit posted...

Unbreakable posted...

@DiaDhuit

Heres a safe space for you, buddy

Lets make a wager on whose account get suspended first. Loser cant make a new one for a month.

Unlike you, I don't care if I lose accounts. Besides, my main is still open. Yours....
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com./user.php?db=.4.user=Hey

I dont see a user level on that. Hey has transcended banning. Another sign from this site that I am destined to be a mod.

ne14a6t9r posted...

I'm not too sure what goes through Allens head, but I've seen numerous times I was sure an account would be banned, only for it to be put into Purgatory. For sure, a lower karma account constantly going against the ToU is more likely to be banned after numerous moderations, it becomes clear that the user is not willing to follow the ToU. Moderation history plays a bog part as well. It's very rare for an account to be banned on their first moderation unless they're deliberately trying.

Ive seen almost 300 accounts (not necessarily mine) be banned on first infractions. Allen has stated that he just highlights all low karma accounts and bans them with one click. There must be an appeal system.

TC want me to tag some folks?

^yall are so predictable

Unbreakable posted...

@DiaDhuit

Heres a safe space for you, buddy

Lets make a wager on whose account get suspended first. Loser cant make a new one for a month.

Menardii posted...

Kombucha posted...

Reminder: TC thinks god will punish women who get abortions.

Reminder #2: TC has sent out rape threats to users here.

Only Kombuchas statement is true. I have neither doxxed nor sent rape threats to any user here.
The_Theorum posted...

How many internet forums do you troll, Hey?

I am not that user and I dont troll.

ne14a6t9r posted...

DiaDhuit posted...

They routinely get stricken down by moderator biases and mass marking

Only admins can ban.

I appreciate you taking the time to respond. Let me clarify: the user gets suspended by having their posts mass marked, and the admin bans solely based off of the karma of the user. Im not saying that the admin is improperly banning users, Im just saying that these users shouldnt be put into position to be banned in the first place.

It is well known that some users meet an unjust end for their time at gamefaqs. They routinely get stricken down by moderator biases and mass marking. Assumptions that they are just some low karma troll with nothing to say are rampant. This must stop. I demand that gamefaqs implements an ability to contest bannings. Imagine how much better this board would be if users like Strike Gently, ROD, and Franklin could come back.

Dont worry strike, I reported the man who called you a creep.

But TC... youll get it back in time for smash, right?

Antonio Brown

mariolover2 posted...

Keep banning low karma users so they have to make new accounts despite not doing anything wrong

Who said that

Nish like swish

Keep banning low karma users so they have to make new accounts despite not doing anything wrong

polopili posted...

I feel like it kinda turned into some kind of libertarian propaganda at this point. Like how serious are you supposed to take a science fiction novel?

This is basically what it is. Instead of teaching adolescents a VERY small lesson on thinking for yourself, its used by 20-30s college grads as some political discussion ender.
_Krave_ posted...

I agree. Brave New World is much more applicable.

Never read that, but its not nearly as obnoxiously paraphrased as 1984, so Ill let it slide.

Posters 5, 6, and 7: this is my highest karma account.

Foppe posted...

We've always been at war with Eastasia.

smoliske posted...

SGReborn posted...

@joestarrr Why are you neglecting my comments?

take a hint creep

Reported. Work hard, play harder.

Lordgold666 posted...

New User
User Since: Oct 2018
Karma: 4
Active Posts: 67
Total Badges: 3

And?

Its an extremely terrible book that pseudointellectuals use to appear educated by claiming the sky is falling down. It has no relevance to modern day America and I take nobody who quotes the book seriously.

And I and many others use that distinction as a part of heterosexuals definition. My definitions are correct because that is what it is collectively agreed upon, evidenced by being the dictionary definition and not a line in a Wikipedia summary.

You are free to not talk to me any more, but you will still be my audience because Ill hva e a new account by the next time we speak.

Godnorgosh posted...

DiaDhuit posted...

That literally is the definition of heterosexual.
1.
(of a person) sexually attracted to people of the opposite sex.

And I'm saying that your definition is too narrow, as it can be and has been used to refer to attraction to a person of a particular gender.

But if we want to nitpick: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterosexuality

Heterosexuality is romantic attraction, sexual attraction or sexual behavior between persons of the opposite sex or gender.

And no, it is not your privilege to treat people poorly because you disagree with them on definitions or assume without evidence that they are being disingenuous. That's not how constructive discussions work.

A) Gender and sex can be and have been used to describe the same thing. So I dont see why you make that claim.
B) It is my right to say what I want, not my privilege. How you respond is up to you.

Godnorgosh posted...

DiaDhuit posted...

So sex isnt the same thing as gender, but being attracted to a sex and a gender is?

No one said being attracted to a sex is the same as being attracted to a gender, just that the definition of "heterosexual" is not as narrow as you seem to think and can be used to refer to either depending on context.

Also, wow, dude. That's pretty low.

That literally is the definition of heterosexual.
1.
(of a person) sexually attracted to people of the opposite sex.

And I make it a point to treat people the way they deserve to be treated. If someone is disingenuous and spouting lies as fact, they should be ridiculed.

Godnorgosh posted...

DiaDhuit posted...

Godnorgosh posted...

EdgeMaster posted...

Yeah, gender and sex are synonyms.

Nope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_gender_distinction

Gender consists in either social roles and characteristics that people associate with sex or a form of self-identification, but gender is not itself sex. You can belong to a certain sex by way of having XY or XX chromosomes while rejecting the accompanying social identity, because it is just thatsocial.

Let me know if you have any further questions.

Ok, but the term is heterosexual.
Hetero=different
Sex=xx or xy
Ual=Makes it a noun

So having sex with a transgender isnt a heterosexual act because they are the same sex as you.

Heterosexuality can be defined to include both sex and gender as a disjunctive: attraction between persons of the opposite sex or gender.

What's more, if a person has sex with a trans person but is not aware that the person is trans, and was attracted to the person based on characteristics more commonly associated with the opposite gender, then it doesn't make much sense to call it a "homosexual act." And in fact, these kinds of scenarios introduce serious problems with describing sexual acts as "homosexual" or "heterosexual," since the literal act of sex doesn't even necessitate attraction.

So sex isnt the same thing as gender, but being attracted to a sex and a gender is? Do you see how convoluted your logic is just to push a point. I know you are just trying to have everything how you want it, but at least try to be genuine. With lies like that I can see why hermiione dumped you.

Hairistotle posted...

King_Hellebuyck posted...

It is a heterosexual act to have intercourse with a trans woman if you're a man.

Thats blatantly transphobic

This lul

Read my last post to see why this is blatantly false.

The fact that people are now pushing for this just proves the slippery slope narrative of a couple years ago was justified. This was something pro-trans activists specifically said was not true and wouldnt be forced on people. They said that they just wanted transgenders to not be oppressed.

Godnorgosh posted...

EdgeMaster posted...

Yeah, gender and sex are synonyms.

Nope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_gender_distinction

Gender consists in either social roles and characteristics that people associate with sex or a form of self-identification, but gender is not itself sex. You can belong to a certain sex by way of having XY or XX chromosomes while rejecting the accompanying social identity, because it is just thatsocial.

Let me know if you have any further questions.

Ok, but the term is heterosexual.
Hetero=different
Sex=xx or xy
Ual=Makes it a noun

So having sex with a transgender isnt a heterosexual act because they are the same sex as you.

Veggeta X posted...

DiaDhuit posted...

Im legitimately curious why someone who has never posted in good faith still has an account.

That's literally more than half of CE.

It isnt. There is a clear difference between the gpgs and DEs and the rest of the board

Im not triggered. Im legitimately curious why someone who has never posted in good faith still has an account.

Veggeta X posted...

For example I can say that DarthWendy isn't a nice person because I saw her post some racist shit against Asians or Vietnamese people. She said something similar of not liking Asians because they eat dogs. What about gunplagirl? What did she say or do that warrants it?

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/400-current-events/77081343

Here take the posts in this topic. Or any of the topics shes ever posted in

Alpha218 posted...

DiaDhuit posted...

Veggeta X posted...

Still waiting on why said user in question should be banned.

Look at literally any post they make. Then realize that it is meant to be inflammmatory and gather a moddable response. Then realize that all her posts are like that. Then ponder why she hasnt been banned.

Again, you are describing literally half of the board. Why single her out except that you disagree with her politics?

I really am not. Her republican equivalent is DE

Veggeta X posted...

And TC is never seen again.

Lol

Veggeta X posted...

Still waiting on why said user in question should be banned.

Look at literally any post they make. Then realize that it is meant to be inflammmatory and gather a moddable response. Then realize that all her posts are like that. Then ponder why she hasnt been banned.

That user trolls on every post and is a gigantic gimmick. Ive never seen them post something constructive and yet they keep their account. Its not like they have a ton of karma either.

Umm no they just believe in fairness

Yeah that topic was bad

tote_all posted...

@DiaDhuit posted...

tote_all posted...

@DiaDhuit

Its about having the muscles contracted for a long period of time. Thats why fat people have sculpted calves, they are constantly under stress.

Yeah but I am asking for a source on that.

Sorry but I just dont care enough to source my argument. Take it or leave it, what I told you was true.

electricbugs2 posted...

ImCallingYouOut posted...

if youre really a teacher no fucking wonder our education system is fucked

You dont even live in America, shut the fuck up

tote_all posted...

@DiaDhuit

Its about having the muscles contracted for a long period of time. Thats why fat people have sculpted calves, they are constantly under stress.