Lurker > Dunsworthy

When my daughter was in the hospital as a preemie, this 13 pound newborn was transferred into the hospital from a different one because they didn't know what to do with him. Nothing was actually wrong with it. I still laugh about it, cuz he was 3 to 4 times bigger than the other babies there and he had the deepest cry I've ever heard from a baby. It sounded like a grown man.

I seem him as a hugo strange.

Asbestos man

Such a stupid insult deserves a modding.

Esrac posted...

The article says the event happened at night. How many of you have actually been at see? I have and it can be hard to see a small object under the best conditions while under way, especially if you aren't looking for it and are sailing in the opposite direction.

The low visibility of night time really exacerbates that. Just because the sinking raft could see a navy vessel doesn't mean the navy vessel could see them at the same time.

Dont you know you shouldn't use logic and reasoning. You're just supposed to be upset at everything you read online

Zero escape is amazing. You will definitely enjoy it.

Tmaster148 posted...

Dunsworthy posted...

Tmaster148 posted...

When they asked the people on the U.S. ship why they didn't help at first, survivors said they were told rescuing people was "not their job." The U.S. Navy had asserted in a statement about the rescue of the 41 people that it showed "our ability to respond rapidly to provide relief."

The ship did not make an effort to rescue them initially. There's really no other way to spin this.

Why is one sides account of what happened considered to be truthful but not the others? It's almost as if people go into a story like this and take sides without actually knowing what happened. Instead of being outraged over something that you have no idea what actually happened, you should just let the investigation take place, then you can complain about it.

Yet you jump to the conclusion that the boat was clearly trying to turn out instead of the evidence proved in the article. Seems like you just don't want to admit you agree with leaving immigrants to drown.

What evidence is that? The words from people who crammed 100 people into a dingy, and thought it would be fine. How are their words more trustworthy than the words from the people that saved a number of them.

Tmaster148 posted...

When they asked the people on the U.S. ship why they didn't help at first, survivors said they were told rescuing people was "not their job." The U.S. Navy had asserted in a statement about the rescue of the 41 people that it showed "our ability to respond rapidly to provide relief."

The ship did not make an effort to rescue them initially. There's really no other way to spin this.

Why is one sides account of what happened considered to be truthful but not the others? It's almost as if people go into a story like this and take sides without actually knowing what happened. Instead of being outraged over something that you have no idea what actually happened, you should just let the investigation take place, then you can complain about it.

Tmaster148 posted...

Dunsworthy posted...

People itt think these boats can just stop on a dime and back up. If they were ignoring them why go back and get them at all?

Because the boat didn't make an attempt to turn around initially. Maybe read the article and understand the context.

Oh I read it. Probably a good chance the migrants didn't understand that the boat cant just stop instantly either. Why would they go back at all if they were being so full of evil to ignore them in the first place? I also notice that the prosecutor originally had not thought there to be any reason to believe the response was incorrect. And that most of the women died on the boat in comparison to the men. Guess women and children as a priority is not a practice migrants employ.

People itt think these boats can just stop on a dime and back up. If they were ignoring them why go back and get them at all?

If you arnt a white privilege racist, you should be happy to give up your job to someone else. Who cares that you wont be able to care for yourself or your family.
-Crazy People in 2018

Hey at least you weren't banned. But yeah it sucks

What were you doing? Being naughty no doubt

Living things>possessions
Humans>animals
Women>men
So taylor swift is the proper gentleman's choice.

I remember walking around my neighborhood and having a random teenager come up to me and ask if I wanted to walk around with him to try and find an arcanine in the area. It was like the most friendly time in human history.

Because it's the best way to say it

Good guy Walmart helping out the common man....

Because back in the day you played the same game over and over so you got faster and faster at beating it. I dont remember ever as a kid thinking I need a save system for Mario 3. We just would pause and come back later if we needed a break. It also helps that you can run through most levels in less than 30 seconds

Why is that guy so happy? Must have arrested him after the act

BlazinBlue88 posted...

General rule is to wash off all raw meat, fresh fruit, and veggies.

Yeah you should never wash meat. Unnecessary and prone to spreading bacteria rather than getting rid of it. Just cook your meat properly and you will have no issues

lww99 posted...

CharlesBronson posted...

who the hell puts a bag on their lawnmower

You don't collect the grass? Idk I think it looks kinda sloppy if you leave clumps of dead grass on the lawn.

Not to mention there are places where you can be fined for not collecting your clippings

Had to check and make sure I was in the year 2018

As a Canadian, we will gladly gift Quebec to the u.s.

AFC - Pat's, Jags, Steelers, Chiefs.
WC - Texans, Chargers
NFC - Saints, Rams, Eagles, Vikings
WC - Falcons, Packers

I think it was pretty clear that no one on the show got a happy ending. I think that was the message that was supposed to be made with the show