Lurker > GaryGaryGary

I assume most people click the dog because everyone knows that means you're a sociopath and it's the 'funny' answer.

No one in real life is letting the baby die unless they're a genuine sicko.

Reddit is a website for people too scared to use the actual internet and who need to be told what their opinion on something should be.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-46660373

Darren Criss will no longer play LGBT characters

He said it's been "a joy" acting in gay roles but no longer feels comfortable doing so, which is "unfortunate".

I suppose actors can pick and choose what roles they take, but to come out and say you're no longer comfortable playing LGBT roles seems a bit off to me.

Acting is acting, you're pretending to be something else.

Playing a gay or a trans character doesn't mean you're actually gay, just like playing a lion or a wookie doesn't mean you're one of those.

It's a shame that an actor wishes to come out say they will no longer take these LGBT roles because of how uncomfortable the roles make you feel.

Perhaps acting isn't the job for you if that is the case.

Everyone in the UK knows that journalists are pieces of shit right from the minute you understand what news is.

I feel this is the healthiest way for normal people and journalists to co-exist.

Deal with it kids and let them get on with it.

Saying that I don't think the USA deserves to be in the list as all the deaths appear to be from that one incident, it's not as if gangs are going around stringing up journalists from lamposts like in mexico or whatever.

It was clearly a one off incident rather than the norm.

catboy0_0 posted...

GaryGaryGary posted...

This place is one of the few left on the internet that hasn't been turned into a complete echo chamber.

And it's still got a pretty decent sense of humour.

you have a sense of humor

I haven't.

The forum has though.

This place is one of the few left on the internet that hasn't been turned into a complete echo chamber.

And it's still got a pretty decent sense of humour.

Anything I post will not be good enough greg, I don't see the point in wasting my time.

I've posted more than enough stats and links to back up my claim.

You seem to want some sort of in depth peer reviewed study of every country in the world down to the finest detail. Which is absurd considering this is a computer game forum.

It's not hard to see how cover ups and sweeping this stuff under the carpet is so easy, people just refuse to believe it is happening when it is close to home which is pretty scary.

When the grooming gangs scandals were breaking in the UK people would give very similar responses to some we've seen in this thread; "prove it", "no worse than anywhere else", "post the facts and stats" etc etc.

Nothing you can really do about it if people refuse to see what is in front of their face.

I got modded for saying I'd feel more comfortable having sex with a man than a transexual, which I thought a bizarre moderation, but I just accepted it because I couldn't see the point in arguing.

GregShmedley posted...

GaryGaryGary posted...

The stats speak for themselves and are much worse than any other available data for any other country.

No no, thats not how this works. You made the claim, the onus is on you to back it up.

GaryGaryGary posted...

Obviously there is not some sort of world wide sex abuse by parents league table with America currently top by loads of points.

That isnt obvious. Please show me stats from other countries that show they arent comparable to America. You stated this, now back it up. Im not taking your word for it nor am I just going to base an opinion on the statistics of America alone.

GaryGaryGary posted...

If you wish to downplay the seriousness of this problem in the USA where it is clearly a huge problem that is up to you.

Im not downplaying anything. Im asking you to back up your statement. Lets not try this lame tactic now.

Backed it up, I've offered the stats that backs up my claim.

If you don't think those stats prove that America has a problem with parents sexual assaulting their children I'm not sure what to say to you to be honest.

https://www.thoughtco.com/facts-about-child-sexual-abuse-statistics-3533871

Despite what children are taught about "stranger danger," most child victims are abused by someone they know and trust. When the abuser is not a family member, the victim is more often a boy than a girl. The results of a three-state study of reported rape survivors under age 12 revealed the following about offenders:

96% were known to their victims
50% were acquaintances or friends
20% were fathers
16% were relatives
4% were strangers

So 1 in 5 rapes in America of children under 12 is carried out by the father, that is an obscene level of that type of abuse.

Girls are the victims of incest and/or intrafamily sexual abuse much more frequently than boys. Between 33-50% of perpetrators who sexually abuse girls are family members, while only 10-20% of those who sexually abuse boys are intrafamily perpetrators. Intrafamily abuse continues over a longer period of time than sexual abuse outside the family, and some forms -- such as parent-child abuse -- have more serious and lasting consequences.

50% of abuse done to girls is incest.

As an aside America also has the worst record in the world for parents killing their children.

https://www.seeker.com/us-worst-in-child-abuse-1765477691.html

Let's not forget we're in a thread here about an American dad raping his daughter, so to claim this doesn't happen in the USA is quite frankly bizarre.

It's so funny that America calls itself the land of the free.

This doesn't sound like the type of thing a 'free people' would be forced to abide by.

Should be land of the cucked.

GregShmedley posted...

GaryGaryGary posted...

GregShmedley posted...

Do you have a source that backs your claim?

Yes, there's literally hundreds of sources to back this up.

Here's the first one I've come across on google.

https://americanspcc.org/child-abuse-statistics/

About 30% of abused and neglected children will later abuse their own children, continuing the horrible cycle of abuse.7

In one study, children whose parents abuse alcohol and other drugs were three times more likely to be abused and more than four times more likely to be neglected than children from non-abusing families

https://americanspcc.org/child-sexual-abuse/

1 in 4 girls and 1 in 6 boys will be sexually abused before they turn 18 years old.

34% of people who sexually abuse a child are family members.

Please point out where states it is more common compared to the rest of the world.

The stats speak for themselves and are much worse than any other available data for any other country.

Obviously there is not some sort of world wide sex abuse by parents league table with America currently top by loads of points.

If you wish to downplay the seriousness of this problem in the USA where it is clearly a huge problem that is up to you.

UnfairRepresent posted...

GaryGaryGary posted...

Nah mate, America is definitely the worst place for parents doing sex stuff with their young children

It's really really really not.

Can tell you've not traveled much

You're a bit like the BBC here when they tried to cover up the fact the UK had a problem with grooming gangs.

You're trying to cover up the fact that America has a problem with parents abusing their young children.

Disturbing.

GregShmedley posted...

Do you have a source that backs your claim?

Yes, there's literally hundreds of sources to back this up.

Here's the first one I've come across on google.

https://americanspcc.org/child-abuse-statistics/

About 30% of abused and neglected children will later abuse their own children, continuing the horrible cycle of abuse.7

In one study, children whose parents abuse alcohol and other drugs were three times more likely to be abused and more than four times more likely to be neglected than children from non-abusing families

https://americanspcc.org/child-sexual-abuse/

1 in 4 girls and 1 in 6 boys will be sexually abused before they turn 18 years old.

34% of people who sexually abuse a child are family members.

UnfairRepresent posted...

GaryGaryGary posted...

Parents raping their young children seems to be absurdly common in parts of America, why is it such a common crime?

Is it a cultural thing?

Its not common in America, it's just actually harshly perscuted in America.

It's way worse in Europe,China, Japan, most of Asia etc.

It's just that the law is much more lax towards it so it's in the news less. it's just considered part and parcel of life to have secret peodphile rings.

Hell the government funded BBC in the UK protected pedophiles for 40 years.

Nah mate, America is definitely the worst place for parents doing sex stuff with their young children it's ridiculously common compared to the rest of the world.

The BBC was covering shit up like Jimmy Savile or downplaying things like grooming gangs, not parent on child stuff.

Parents raping their young children seems to be absurdly common in parts of America, why is it such a common crime?

Is it a cultural thing?

I would imagine most of these women are not physically attractive.

No prison could hold me, I'd break out well before the 20 years were up.

The only people in prison are those who want to be there, anyone who truly desires freedom can achieve it.

A_Good_Boy posted...

How does a Catholic service usually go for someone that committed suicide?

You use to have your head chopped off and it was placed at your feet in your grave, and that grave was not allowed to be on consecrated ground.

Kastrada posted...

Irony posted...

Kastrada posted...

refmon posted...

While Ryan Coogler made a movie about a comic book character created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby.

He also volunteers with and mentors incarcerated children and has a non-profit that combats human rights violations.

Most celebrities have that stuff

Yes I realize that. But people are acting like he only directed a comic book movie. He actually does humanitarian work.

Is visiting criminals in prison really a net positive on the karma scale though?

Pic looks staged to me.

Everything anyone knows is available on google anyway so this is a silly thread.

Could have googled any of these 'facts'.

1) earn more money

2) get a nicer face

3) get a better body

4) have a wash.

5) get a hair cut

the end.

Remember that New York vs London murders thing that the press were obsessed with earlier in the year, any idea who is currently winning this 'competition' as the more dangerous city to live in?

All work is shit and only a complete moron enjoys it.

Even if I was a premier league footballer earning 300k a week I'd still hate going in for training and shit like that.

Asthma.

Chief physician Allan M. Lund at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen warns that vegan food can have severe consequences, such as epilepsy and ultimately developmental disorders.

In Denmark, there is now a debate about the suitability of an increasing number of families giving their children only vegan food. Critics are opposed to scrapping all animal products in small childrens diet.

The problem is that poor food, which for example requires the addition of vitamin B12, can have serious consequences for children. And as a result several children on a vegan diet have been treated at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen.

Such a diet may involve developing different brain symptoms. With muscle weakness, poor contact and epilepsy. And in the long term mental ************, says chief physician Allan M. Lund to TV4.

According to Lund, one should not completely remove meat, eggs and dairy products from small childrens diet without first consulting with a dietician.

In addition to developmental disorders, it can also cause nutritional deficiencies.

Well well well.

I had to reword the title by the way because what the doctor actually said was deemed as unacceptable by this forum, which is a bit bonkers but there you go.

I also can't post a link to the article for the same reason.

Is he a dwarf?

I'm not a gay but I honestly would rather do a man to woman one who still has a willy up the bum than one of the fully changed ones in the front part.

Just don't think I'd be up for going in to the man made vagina thing in case something happened.

Irony posted...

GaryGaryGary posted...

Does anyone actually claim climate change isn't real?

Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of geology can demonstrate unequivocal evidence of extreme climate change throughout the history of this planet.

Topic is about global warming not climate change

Global warming is a form of climate change.

Global warming was 're-branded' as climate change after that East Anglia university scandal.

Does anyone actually claim climate change isn't real?

Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of geology can demonstrate unequivocal evidence of extreme climate change throughout the history of this planet.

Kerred posted...

GaryGaryGary posted...

This PC is going to have worse looking games than an Xbox one X all things considered and is about 4-5 times the price.

Why do people throw so much money away for an inferior gaming experience?

Weird, all my games run at max settings 60fps fine, including games like Witcher 3.. What is the better alternative for PC?

An Xbox one X.

This PC is going to have worse looking games than an Xbox one X all things considered and is about 4-5 times the price.

Why do people throw so much money away for an inferior gaming experience?

I'd have the genie give me the power to have anyone do whatever I tell them to.

gunplagirl posted...

Rebel_Patriot posted...

Oh no! their shoulders and lower back were touched. Thats literally how you guide women around or yourself around women in crowded places.

PoopPotato posted...

Being touched on the arm or back to say "hey I need through" is considered groping now.

Upper arm is one thing but why the hell would you tap somebody's back to get their attention? That's like, literally predator/ prey habit of the primordial variety.

That's how people get passed each in busy places.

I was at an away game following my football (soccer) team the other week, was rammed in the ground, the concourse was sardine shit.

My back must have touched over 50 times with people trying to get around me at various points while I was in the ground.

If I took that as being groped it would be a sign of genuine mental illness.

Fossil posted...

GaryGaryGary posted...

It does, messes with all sorts of shit.

It's not a coincidence that so many internet nutters are addicted to soy milk, have man boobs, terrible eyesight and unusual hair (facial and head).

It messes with hormones which makes people overly emotional and gives them gynecomastia.

The weird hair is a sign of not being in a particularly healthy state.

I'm not even getting into the things like the added cancer risks and male infertility.

Drinking soy is worse for you than smoking 40 a day.

I don't care if you do it, by all means carry on drinking that poison, I'm not doing it though.

https://www.livestrong.com/article/548574-soy-protein-male-breasts/
https://tonic.vice.com/en_us/article/vdb383/no-eating-soy-isnt-going-to-give-you-manboobs
https://www.mensjournal.com/food-drink/does-soy-really-cause-man-boobs/
https://www.webmd.com/breast-cancer/features/soy-effects-on-breast-cancer#1
https://www.health24.com/Diet-and-nutrition/Healthy-foods/3-myths-about-soy-that-you-should-stop-believing-right-now-20180226
https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/expert-answers/soy-breast-cancer-risk/faq-20120377
https://www.hairlossrevolution.com/does-soy-cause-hair-loss/

https://lpi.oregonstate.edu/mic/dietary-factors/phytochemicals/soy-isoflavones

That last link is the most informational. The only thing I could find while doing some quick research that "might" hold water is Breast Cancer survivors consumption of Soy should be in moderation (which should be the case with anything you consume...)

Soy Milk also has an extremely low count of Soy Isoflavones compared to other Soy based products.

ps - You should do some homework on just how "good" dairy milk is for you

The tobacco industry would regularly publish articles rubbishing the claims that smoking was bad for your health.

I can post a shit load of articles that 'prove' soy milk is bad for you

https://www.menshealth.com/nutrition/a19539170/soys-negative-effects/
https://www.livestrong.com/article/498601-what-are-the-dangers-of-drinking-soy-milk/
https://www.belmarrahealth.com/soy-milk-bad-men-dangers-soy-milk/

Here's an article from some time ago about the lobbying and misinformation that the soy industry puts out.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2004/nov/07/foodanddrink.features7

It's far bigger business now as well so it's ten times as bad today.

I like the fact you can kick dogs to death.

Fossil posted...

GaryGaryGary posted...

Drink dairy substitute soy products.

That shit fucks up the male body.

... no it doesn't.

It does, messes with all sorts of shit.

It's not a coincidence that so many internet nutters are addicted to soy milk, have man boobs, terrible eyesight and unusual hair (facial and head).

It messes with hormones which makes people overly emotional and gives them gynecomastia.

The weird hair is a sign of not being in a particularly healthy state.

I'm not even getting into the things like the added cancer risks and male infertility.

Drinking soy is worse for you than smoking 40 a day.

I don't care if you do it, by all means carry on drinking that poison, I'm not doing it though.

Drink dairy substitute soy products.

That shit fucks up the male body.

Can DeGrasse Tyson go back to being a scientist or is he too shit at science to make a proper career of it?

I bet the drug addled mess that did this isn't even aware of what they've done.

Meninism is just about equality between the sexes, if you believe men and women are equal then you're a meninist.

People are far more comfortable acting like idiots in this day and age.

In my day everyone use to pride themselves on how stoic they were, now it's all about crying in public and complaining someone has upset you with their bigotry or whatever.

S club 7 were amazing.

I wonder what their restera logins were.

Ariana Grande.

I once watched a porno that was two transexuals having sex with each other.

The one was a man to woman one, had all the top half done properly with a woman looking face, hair and boobs and stuff but still had a fully working cock and balls.

The other one was a woman to man one who had a bald head, a goatee beard, a masculine chest with 6 pack and all the jazz but then had a proper working sex fanny.

The feminine looking man to woman one was rally going to town on the really masculine looking woman to man one.

A_Good_Boy posted...

GaryGaryGary posted...

Lost_All_Senses posted...

GaryGaryGary posted...

Secondly, I thought guns were legal in the USA.

So, because something is legal it means you can use it however you want?...what kind of dumb logic.

Did he use it?

Brandishing is using.

I disagree.

Lost_All_Senses posted...

GaryGaryGary posted...

Secondly, I thought guns were legal in the USA.

So, because something is legal it means you can use it however you want?...what kind of dumb logic.

Did he use it?

Firstly, I can't even see the gun.

Secondly, I thought guns were legal in the USA.